Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

[Special Clip] Dreamcatcher's JiU, SuA, Yoohyeon 'Taki Taki' (Choreography by SuA) (Patreon)

Published:
2024-01-18 03:04:35
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

INTRO - 0:00

REACTION - 1:04

ANALYSIS - 2:55

OUTRO - 11:36

Files

Previews only

DANCE CHOREOGRAPHER REACTS - Dreamcatcher's JiU, SuA, Yoohyeon 'Taki Taki' (Choreography by SuA)

-- VIDEO CONTENTS -- INTRO - 0:00 REACTION - 1:04 ANALYSIS - 2:55 OUTRO - 11:36 #dreamcatcher #dreamcatcherreaction #reaction #dancepractice #dancepracticereaction #kpop #kpopdance #kpopdancereaction #kpopreaction #danceanalysis #dance #드림캐쳐 #TAKITAKI @Dreamcatcherofficial @happyfaceent ORIGINAL VIDEO - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dGFe4MlaZU

Comments

Aislin

The tattoos at that you see are temp tattoos... at the time. Yoohyeon went and got a real tattoo... and another. (liberté on her ribs and a small 4 leaf clover on her arm) Siyeon, Yoohyeon, and Dami are the ones with real tattoos. Everyone else uses temporary tattoos. (for now lol) She's a 97 line! (Very very early January) Dongie is the same age as you. (I don't know if anyone ever explained that Handong's name is Han Dong (surname Han, given name Dong), so we do call her Dongie and it's perfectly acceptable since it's just her first name said kind of cutely.)

Eafiu

God I talked about it on Youtube a tiny bit but here is a good place to come back to it: As a psychologist and behavioural scientist mindful of the intricacies of some neuroscience research and what they mean about behaviour, I find it a little bit more useful to look at things from the desire vs. risk assessment level because that translates the nebulous brain development tidbits to actual observable behaviour + works well for this kind of analysis about safe vs. unsafe actions and situations while also taking into account everyone's individual experiences growing up. As the brain develops from around teenhood, what gets refined so to say is what goes into risk assessment. To simplify, for proper risk assessment: you need to compare your short-term and long-term wants, your short-term and long-term needs, your current context and how which actions (from you or your surroundings) can lead to what kind of outcomes. This is obviously very complex! And especially in the case of imagining your future and making in-the-moment decisions for it... it's something we start learning as children essentially little by little. The farther the future is, the harder it gets to take it seriously. For infants, even 5-10 minutes is difficult! This is one of the areas that set young teens, older teens and adults apart behaviourally: Adults weigh short- and long-term risks more consistently against their desires, while teens, especially younger teens, overweigh desires and potential for fulfilment against the thoughts of risk. This is always on averages and varies by life experience! Hell, children and teens growing up in precarious circumstances who get introduced to immediate risks they can't ignore early on develop that skill way quickly for example, and not always in healthy ways. (They can instead overweigh risks against their potential happiness, for example. Or the extreme way they grow up may make their worldview so skewed that they don't correctly assess situations one way or another.) This framing helps a lot while trying to help students and young workers so it is important when it comes to idols. The way they grow up and get trained and the experience they gain of the world (in and outside the industry) matter for them to make decisions based on their career wants and needs - what to do, what to agree to, what to compromise on, what to NOT compromise on, etc. I think looking at it from this perspective helps shift the conversation away from "is X mature enough to decide" to "does the environment this kid is in allow grace for their person and career". In research, ethics dictate that you get the INFORMED consent of your participants - like, I'm not just asking their permission to, idk, stick a needle in their arm, I'm explaining what the needle is, what it does, what it might cause, what it will be used on, how the data will be kept private, etc. I really like that framing: instead of just consent vs. coercion, it should be informed consent vs. misinformed consent vs. coercion. Only one of these three is "true" consent, and that's the kind of environment we need to strive for. And as people who build an environment with children, teens and young adults, we need to minimize unnecessary risk around them because it is more likely than unlikely that their decision-making is still skewed towards immediate wants vs long-term safety.

JessReacts764
>>127411686

VERY VALID POINTS!!! (It’s science so of course haha) so true on simple and complex levels and the environmental consent vs the “black/white” consent from age or specific factors is such a great way to look at things!! Thank you THANK YOU! I will be referring to this for the future for sure!