Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Welcome to Select Answers, a feature that provides some of the answers to questions that were posed to Sean Ross Sapp in the most recent Fightful Weekly Q&A Podcast. The show drops every week on Fightful Select for subscribers.

When aggregating these posts please refer to it as "Fightful Select Answers Q&A" and tag Fightful, noting that it was in the Q&A format to avoid confusion.

***

With cena saying he wanted to do the 200+ dates, did wwe not do it due to money issues?

All due respect to John Cena, WWE doesn't have 220 dates to do. There are about 100 Raw and Smackdown dates, and 12-16 PLE and SNME shows. Unless he considers traveling in an additional date -- which is possible -- there aren't that many to do. But the fact that WWE didn't ask him to be around weekly is insane.

WWE's general usage of John Cena and his time since 2020 has been weird. When everything shut down for COVID, they barely used him after Mania. They brought him back for two return tours and put him in a bunch of dark matches. I dunno, man.

So, I think I didn't ask my question properly, but since Okada relinquished(as AEW put it) the Continental title, I wanna confirm if this is how it goes. The International & Continental titles make up the Unified title, which is its own lineage, but the 2 belts are also still continuing as their own titles. Should Okada lose either of those belts, the Unified title is technically vacated as the Unified title only can be a thing if someone holds both the International title & the Continental titles at the same time. Am I getting this right? Cause my brain feels like it's learning how toast is made. Jokes aside, thank you again for doing what you do, especially with the debunkathon and Facebook.

It is pointless and convoluted.

If Okada loses the Continental Championship, the Unified Title just ceases to exist because nothing is unified.

He still will have the International title.

TOO MANY TITLE BELTS.

What does the Netflix acquisition of Warner Bros mean for AEW Tv/streaming?

Right now, nothing. At minimum, AEW has a TV and streaming deal through 2027, and then WBD has option years. It's going to take almost all of 2026 at least for this to even go through, despite Netflix acting as if it is guaranteed. By the time that happens, AEW will be in their last guaranteed year. Despite what people pretend, there will be options out there for AEW if for some reason WBD/Netflix doesn't renew. Amazon Prime, Paramount, Fox are all possibilities. I'm not sure of Netflix's exclusivity with WWE.

Comments

Jeremey

AEW on prime would be so dope

Eric Mccarthy

I think its kinda obvious what they’re doing with the unified title at least to me, I think the plan is Takeshita wins the C2 but doesn’t actually beat Okada to do it, setting up the reunification most likely at Revolution, I’ve had this thought since Fletcher beat Okada

Speed Punk

I think correct me if I'm wrong but Discovery is breaking off warner to be come Discovery Global and it will run the TV side of Warner and discovery. I believe Netflix only bought the Warner bros properties, an not the channels or Discovery owned properties . An I think AEW will probably be moved to discovery+ and it's backlog just goes on discovery+ . I think in India it was shown on discovery+ there I read in an article once.

Victor Montgomery Jr.

John hasn't worked a full schedule in years, so maybe his mode of thinking was still stuck in early-mid 2000s terms, when 200+ dates was more realistic?

kalique

the unified title should not be that hard to mentally grasp holy

CSDX

"It is pointless and convoluted." *slams desk* THANK you. I ESPECIALLY agree about the too many title belts thing more than before now, because we don't even need a National title if we still got the International one!!!!!