Select Answers: Defending MITB, Cass/Enzo, Women's Stables (Patreon)

Welcome to Select Answers, a feature that provides some of the answers to questions that were posed to Sean Ross Sapp in the most recent Fightful Weekly Q&A Podcast. The show drops every week on Fightful Select for subscribers.

When aggregating these posts please refer to it as "Fightful Select Answers Q&A" and tag Fightful, noting that it was in the Q&A format to avoid confusion.

***

Hey sean do you think money in the bank briefcases should be defended like titles the longer they go without cashing in?

I think it's something they should try doing next year. This is another thing to "defend" and another thing for character development. It inspires wrestlers to cash in earlier, but also could inspire other wrestlers to prevent cash ins, because they're hoping that they can win the briefcase. It could emanate from the briefcase holder affecting outcomes of matches, and the authority figure saying they're forcing their hand. This could make for a great creative thread.

What's the scoop on Big Cass, and is there any word on WWE bringing back Enzo Amore as the returning tag team partner of the 7-footer on RAW?

There is no scoop on Big Cass. He was signed, he's been on the show, and is slotted where they see him. It's definitely puzzling to the audience. Enzo Amore had talks with WWE this year, and from what I understand, still wants to go to WWE. However, he is not signed. It definitely would be the reverse order of how people should be brought in, as Enzo struggling then bringing in Cass would have made more sense, but I don't know that's the plan anyway, or that there even is a plan.

Why don't promotions make larger factions with more women like the men get? I keep hoping for a Yakuza-style Shida lead faction.

Because even though there have been huge advances in women's wrestling, it's still lacking for fear of the audience not receiving it well. It's been a faction that's been pitched a number of times, but hasn't been executed.