Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Django Unchained Reaction (Patreon)

Published:
2024-04-14 16:41:50
Edited:
2026-06-13 03:03:04
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:

Files

Django Unchained FULL Munchies

Watch "Django Unchained FULL Munchies" on Streamable.

Comments

R.I.P. Lee Pitman (2001-2025)

Another Tarantino movie!? I'm not complaining, they are great and I love your reactions to them. 💖🌹

Dream Howl

Can't wait to watch 🤣 After you bring Tarantino to an end, you should watch Martin Scorsese's films! 👌👌👌👌

fan

Bounty hunting was real, and technically is still real, but I’m unsure about the dead or alive aspect today. But back then there were absolutely courts that allowed dead or alive orders on criminals. It was mostly only applied to extremely bad criminals wanted for extreme acts of violence they did. Also fortunately the Mandingo fighting thing never happened and was just a story element.

mundanelotus

I love watching your reactions to these Tarantino movies. The violence in this one is really extreme so I get why you look away often lol

Justin Irwin

Slavery was really one of the darkest times in American history, if not the darkest part of American history. The issue really isn't as black and white as is commonly believed though, and I think Tarantino did a great job portraying with the character of Stephen. The sad reality is that nearly 4,000 black freemen owned slaves as well and it's believed that the first legal slave owner was a black man named Anthony Johnson, though there is argument whether or not he was the first legal slave owner in the present day United States. Slavery is an issue that has plagued mankind for thousands of years and unfortunately it is still an issue in some parts of the world. In my 21st century mind, I cannot understand how a person can be the property of another person, but this idea was rarely questioned in centuries past, even in the so called "civilized" world. Either way, I'm glad we live in a time where most of the world shares the opinion that individuals cannot be property of others, a world where the very idea of it sickens us. Thank you Chi and Hella for reacting to this movie and expressing your thoughts on this topic, I really enjoy listening to what you guys think.

fan

We need to get Hella a role in a Tarantino movie

S_Vive

Ah, crud... no subtitles for this one.

S_Vive

The ladies unfortunately miss more early on in the films viewed without the benefit of subtitles. Dr. King Schultz is a doctor... of dentistry. In the bar scene early on in the film, Schultz didn't say he despised slaves, but rather he despised slavery... the actual act/practice of enslaving a person.

Edward Olson

Why are you trying to diminish the FACT that slavery of Black Africans in the Americas was caused and controlled by white people by focusing on everything else? But guess what? Slavery IS STILL LEGAL in the United States. Just read the 13th Amendment, which allows slavery of prisoners -- which is why in the early 20th century, WHITE people in so-called "law enforcement" and the "criminal justice system" (not a few black freemen) began massive incarceration of Black people. This still happens today.

S_Vive

Ladies, the US dollar as a currency was much (MUCH) stronger back then in the era of the film's events... so $25 bounty payment per Briddle brother was actually a goodly amount. One could have bought a rifle, pistol, ammo, a horse, gear/supplies, meals, etc. for the $75 sum for the three bounties... and still have funds remaining. (Except for the unfortunate fact of the era that, as a black man, he would have difficultly finding people in those parts of the country willing to do business with him for any amount of money.)

fan

Edward you should try reading Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D. Then you should look into who owned the ships and profited from the trade both domestically and abroad. Although I already know you will respond angrily lol

S_Vive

Dr. King Schultz couldn't just leave Candyland after the deal was made without making Calvin Candy aware of how much he despised him... and couldn't resist (as he said afterwards to Django) "shaking hands"/firing his Derringer pistol at—and killing— Calvin Candy... because he felt for the plight of all the other slaves there and believed that Calvin must be killed to bring some small end to the evils that would otherwise continue if he didn't kill him.

S_Vive

The Smitty Becall Gang wanted poster Django tricks the mining company escort men with was the poster that earlier that winter Dr. King Schultz had told Django to save (a tradition that marked the collection of your first bounty)... so, yes, that job had already long ago been completed.

S_Vive

Ok...Hella did seem to have caught on to some of that, based on the closing comments.

Justin Irwin

I didn't even grace this dude with a response. I saw that he likes to write words using caps, when I see that, it ain't even worth reading. If he read my comment, I didn't diminish the involvement of white folks during slavery, I was simply explaining why Samuel L Jackson's character was so hostile toward the other slaves, because it wasn't black and white, it was more based off of power. But folks like this fellow just drink the kool-aid and push the narrative that white people are bad. I would challenge Edward to listen to Thomas Sowell on this issue, but it would most likely go over his head.

Noal

TinCan Cosmanaut

I love your reactions. You guys are smart and figure everything out everything when you have all the clues but the language barrier leaves you with missing pieces to the story

Alec Dacyczyn

Naturally, the next movie on you list should be the 'The Hateful Eight'. It's Tarantino quasi-sequel to this movie.

S_Vive

Hella caught the director's cameo... though it's unclear how.

Edward Olson

No it's not related to this movie AT ALL. Don't confuse them.

Henry N.

This is however the essence of the master-slave relationship. Black slave owners were brought up in the South, so this is the western framework in which they conceptualized the world around them. Stephen's character is a caricature of this idea to an extent. (before you object to my use of the word "western", I expand on that below) Those who were subjugated by the "Master" (literally or metaphorically), once they have climbed the social hierarchy, this is the framework in which they will impose their own superiority over the hierarchy below them, a manifestation of the Will to Power, but also a manifestation of a system that has already conditioned them to this hierarchical structure. Starting on the lower end of this structure, one may be eager to transcend it and become the thing that they have observed as the highest form of freedom, not only freedom on its “own”, but also the freedom to “own”. Once again this is the idealogy which they have been accustomed to. As poisonous ideology begets such ideology. And the ones at the bottom will fight among themselves to climb the ladder. I think it’s naive to make the claim that because there were blacks who owned slaves, they (black slave owners) were wholly complicit in the atrocity itself. (Maybe this isn't what you were implying, and I apologize if my assumption is wrong) Yes, complicit to an extent, but I don’t think that’s as black and white either. There is another implication from the apologist claim that slaves were already slaves before they were brought over to U.S, however the key difference here is that slaves who were slaves in Africa were slaves of war, similar to Ancient Rome, not slaves of a race-superior ideology. Two very different things. There is a man named Equino who was a slave taken from Africa in the 18th Century who eventually bought his own freedom and wrote a memoir about his experience. He stated that he would rather be the lowest slave in Africa than be a plantation slave in the Americas. I enjoy Thomas Sowell too, and I’m not claiming you are entirely wrong, I just think the picture you painted is somewhat incomplete.

Cornelius P. Stranglefart, Attorney at Law D.D.S.

Ladies, please ignore all this garbage. They take every chance they can get to try and downplay the evil of white american slave owners. The whole post could be summed up as... "black people owned slaves too... oh and other countries... this is important context because... uh... because I'm personally still struggling with my own racism and ego today"... Hope that clears it all up. They don't have near enough shame for slavery. It's really sad.

Henry N.

@Cornelius, I was arguing against this idea completely, so I assume you're not referring to my post

Proto Type

"D J A N G O , The D is silent" ~

Muad san

I have my personal opinion of the hatefull 8, but they will probably be mainly bored. There are better Tarantino's, such as Reservoir Dogs or Once upon a time...

Ken

Feel pity if you want. These 'people's will push you in front of a train for sport. They're our burden now and it's a shame because the level of stupid and violent was never really bred out of them

S_Vive

Sir, come on... leave such opinions/thoughts/views off this channel. I know there are folks out there that believe such things, and we all have a right to our beliefs... but those don't need to be promulgated via this venue.

Adam JG

@cornelius etc - you realize like more than half a million white men died to free the slaves right? btw what does it hurt to put things into perspective and add context ? it sure beats "the why man is evil and just hates blacks cause they be jealous." Whites were the ones to realize slavery was wrong. The British empire did their best trying to end it wherever they could, despite that, slavery still goes on today, in the islamic world.

TMIMITW

Watch SINNERS