Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Note: This piece contains spoilers for Project Hail Mary, Interstellar and (in as much as it can be spoiled) 2001: A Space Odyssey. If you’re looking for a quick review of Project Hail Mary: it’s a good time at the pictures. It’s fun, playful, and charming. It has a nice goofy performance from Ryan Gosling, but a really incredible CGI/puppet performance. I feel kind of bad that this piece is mostly me talking about the parts of an enjoyable film that, to me, held it back from greatness, because it is a lovely crowdpleasing spectacle of a film.

Project Hail Mary is the latest film from directors Christopher Miller and Phil Lord.

It is in some ways a departure for the pair, who largely developed as a creative team defined by their work in comedy with a decidedly postmodern bent, from the animated feature films Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and The LEGO Movie through to the spoof 1980s reboot 21 Jump Street and 22 Jump Street. This is true even in the context of the films produced by the pair, such as Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. As a rule, these are funny and self-aware movies.

On paper, Project Hail Mary feels like it should be something else. It is a space adventure movie with apocalyptic stakes, as unlikely astronaut Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling) finds the weight of the world placed on his shoulders. When the sun starts dimming due to the arrival of strange alien creatures known as “astrophages” feeding on the sun’s light, Grace is tasked with making the long and dangerous journey towards Tau Ceti, the only local star unaffected by these parasites.

However, in practice, Project Hail Mary leans very strongly into Lord and Miller’s sensibility. It is an adaptation of the book by the same name from author Andy Weir, who also wrote The Martian. The screenplay is adapted by Drew Goddard, who also adapted The Martian. That space adventure about an astronaut trapped on Mars was somewhat light-hearted considering the stakes, to the point it was infamously nominated for “Best Musical/Comedy” at the Golden Globes.

Project Hail Mary makes The Martian look like a gritty stripped down drama. Ryan Gosling is very much in the mode that has defined the past eight years or so of his career, playing a lovable goofball like those featured in The Nice Guys, Barbie and The Fall Guy. It is a long way from the brooding and serious performances that defined his earlier career in movies like First Man, Blade Runner 2049, Only God Forgives, Drive, The Place Beyond the Pines and so on.

This pivot away from serious dramatic work in Gosling’s career is intentional. “A long time ago I went to see a shrink and he wrote me a prescription that said: ‘Do comedy,’” Gosling told The Evening Standard in 2016. Gosling has told this story several times; apparently, he got this advice after working on Blue Valentine in 2011. Gosling also talked to The Wall Street Journal about taking lighter roles for the sake of his kids, who were on set during the production of Project Hail Mary.

As such, Project Hail Mary feels very much like a Lord and Miller movie in that sense. It is a very fun and very broad comedy, in which the potential extinction of the human race is never allowed to put too much of a dampener on Gosling’s goofy screen persona. There are extended and repeated jokes, some impressive comedic set pieces and a general warmth pervading the movie that feels somewhat at odds with the general premise.

However, the film feels like a Lord and Miller production in other ways. Lord and Miller are extremely postmodern directors. They might even be described as “metamodernism”, that post-postmodernism school of referential filmmaking often applied to movies like recent Best Picture winner Everything Everywhere All At Once. The idea is that such works employ the referential style of postmodernism, drawing from a wealth of influences, but towards an authentic emotional end.

Most of Lord and Miller’s movies are extremely referential. The LEGO Movie is a film about playing with toys featuring a cast of licensed characters like Batman (Will Arnett) or Gandalf (Morgan Freeman). The Jump Street films are very self-aware about being nostalgic riffs on a retro property, as demonstrated by monologues from Deputy Chief Hardy (Nick Offerman) and by the closing credits to 22 Jump Street that offer a pitch-perfect satire of contemporary franchise media.

Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is a love letter to both Spider-Man media, lifting art styles directly from specific comics, but also to animation in general, including stylistic shoutouts to Looney Tunes and anime. The film takes for granted the audience’s familiarity with the contours of the Spider-Man mythos, running no fewer than six variations of the Spider-Man origin, with the assumption that the audience will be able to fill in the gaps as they go.

In concept, Project Hail Mary would not seem to lend itself to this approach. After all, it does not take place within an existing fictional universe or with an existing intellectual property. Nevertheless, the film is overt in placing itself within a larger cinematic lineage. This is the latest in a line of space movies that includes films like Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, Danny Boyle’s Sunshine, Alfonso Cuarón’s Gravity, Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, Ridley Scott’s The Martian and so on.

Almost every major beat or scene in Project Hail Mary has some sort of antecedent within the genre, often quite overtly. Grace’s red space suit evokes 2001. His mission to reignite the sun is the basic plot of Sunshine. His first meeting with a mysterious alien that he comes to call “Rocky” (James Ortiz) recalls the contact scenes in Arrival. One of Grace’s only companions is a robot arm like that featured in Iron Man, which was a key reference point for Mark Watney (Matt Damon) in The Martian.

The climax leans rather heavily on Interstellar. At one point, the ship spins so fast that the centrifugal force reaches a point where it will cause a blackout, recalling a key action sequence in Interstellar. There is also a big reveal towards the climax that despite Rocky describing Grace as “brave”, he is actually a coward who did not volunteer for the mission to save mankind, mirroring a similar reveal about Mann (Matt Damon) in Interstellar. Rocky’s ship also evokes the tesseract in Interstellar.

Even the ending of Project Hail Mary feels like a more accessible take on the conclusion of 2001. In 2001, astronaut David Bowman (Keir Dullea) journeys through a wormhole to make contact with an alien intelligence. Although never explicitly stated, the imagery implies these aliens build a habitat for Bowman and allow him to live out a life in an alien environment. At the end of Project Hail Mary, Grace goes home to Rocky’s world, where they build a miniature ecosphere for him.

There is perhaps even a slight nod to Gosling’s previous entry in the “sad astronaut” canon, Damien Chazelle’s First Man. In that film, which is inspired by true events, Neil Armstrong (Gosling) only ends up on the manned mission to the moon because of a freak fire that kills the first draft picks. In Project Hail Mary, Grace is a last-minute substitute who is chosen after the first draft picks are killed in a freak fire.

The difference between Project Hail Mary and earlier Lord and Miller films is that these references are not explicitly articulated. While Grace makes a joking allusion to Alien, he never remarks that he is wearing the space suit from 2001 or that the first contact chamber looks very similar to Arrival. Grace has seemingly never seen First Man, which is unsurprising not just because of the paradox of realizing that it stars his doppelgänger, but because the film notoriously underperformed.

This is the most frustrating aspect of Project Hail Mary, which is otherwise a very enjoyable movie. It feels like the first time that Lord and Miller are making these sorts of pop culture references simply for the sake of making these sorts of pop culture references, rather than in service of some larger narrative or thematic point. Their earlier films included lots of these sorts of references, but often building towards a clear goal.

The LEGO Movie is, as the title implies, literally and thematically about taking disparate pieces and putting them together to build something new, so its magpie approach to pop culture makes a great deal of sense. 21 Jump Street and 22 Jump Street are fun theatrical comedies, but there is always a sense that they are joking about themselves, they are making a broader point about how desperate Hollywood’s dependence on intellectual property had become that Sony was rebooting 21 Jump Street.

The two Spider-Verse movies are very directly about the idea that anybody can be a superhero, including Miles Morales (Shameik Moore). There is no single right way to be a hero, just as there is no single right way to tell a Spider-Man story. The films are textually about this, with Across the Spider-Verse pitting Miles against Miguel O'Hara (Oscar Isaac), who is policing the canon and who believes Miles does not belong in this particular story.

Similar to Everything Everywhere All At Once, form and function are intertwined, what these movies are is also what they are about. These Lord and Miller projects are not just referential, they use their references to make a large point. More than that, they often bring these competing (and occasionally contradictory) influences together to create something that feels new. Their use of existing material is inherently nostalgic, but it is also iterative, evoking the notion of sampling in hip-hop.

Project Hail Mary marks the first time that Lord and Miller’s work feels imitative rather than iterative. It honestly doesn’t feel like they have anything particularly insightful to say about the films that they are quoting from, other than that they are good films. These are good films, but they are also widely available, and they have things to say about their own influences. Nolan’s Interstellar riffs on Kubrick’s 2001, but larger as a rejection of the oft-cited comparison between Nolan and Kubrick.

It’s the biggest problem with Project Hail Mary, which is otherwise a really fun and enjoyable time at the movies. This sense that it is borrowing from these influences for no greater reason than to reference a bunch of great movies is also what makes it Lord and Miller’s weakest effort to date. The pair have honed their crowd-pleasing instincts, but for the first time have lost their own voice in the mix.

The result is a film that reaches for the heavens, but is not quite out of this world.

Files

Comments

Austin Barnes

I get what you mean, but on the other hand... If all these references had been pointed out (like "Oh, its just like 2001!') It would have been very jarring. The best references are there for you to see and if you know, you know while also not slowing or hindering the thing you are experiencing. Here the references are apparent, but if you don't know them, it doesn't make the movie worse and it doesn't eat up time having to explain them. Compare this to say Ready Player One, where so much stuff is reference based because that is actually the essence of the plot that it has to keep explaining the references in case you don't get them. Sorry for the text dump, but apparently this was the thing that occupied my brain this morning. Thank you as always for your writing.

Bob

I actually liked this movie a lot bc it held back on the explicit references. That was my biggest issue with The Martian, which I didn't like for other reasons too. This one was much better bc it wasn't saying "Hey it's like that thing from that other sci-fi movie!" Yes, I felt a lot of the references but I appreciated that it didn't say them out loud and just let my brain process the reference. It allowed to be familiar without feeling forced. And honestly the story, setting, and especially the characters held the movie up any ways. I also bought Gosling in this role where as the Martian just felt Matt Damon plays an astronaut.

Ando

Good read, as usual! - and I agree. I went into the film blind and didn't even realize it was based on a book, and at times wondered if ChatGPT had just scripted something to play all the hits of the genre. Though the overall package was alright, pretty fun, something about those moments felt a little bit artificial and it was stopping me from fully giving myself to it. I dunno. The glazing this movie seems to be getting is curious. There were some good things, and happy for people to be turning out at the cinemas (is this the first x-saves-cinemas film of 2026?) - but it was just...fine for me. Maybe one of those flicks that is more about what people want from their cinema experience (fun, non-franchise/reboot, good for the family at 4pm on a Saturday) than what is actually on the film itself... Of course, I can't deny that it felt a little bit icky to be told by an Amazon/Bezos production that salvation for the Earth can come from individuals, so long as we're brave (and don't mind being forced into this bravery by shadowy tech orgs). Probably unfair of me to think that way, but...maybe this tainted my viewing.

Whimsy

I feel like Andy Weir’s writing is kinda like that too. I’ll catch referential tropes and situations in his books that aren’t explicitly calling out that they’re referential. I think part of their charm is that they often are more of a vibe from a particular clump of an era of a genre rather than being just like a singular movie or book.

Darren Mooney

Weir's prose - I only read the bits of "The Martian" that he posted online back in the day - always struck me as very "Reddit humour." So meta, self-aware, and so on.

Justin Buergi

Kinda reminds me of a book series I read as a kid, The Imaginarium Geographica, with the premise being that the work of every great author throughout history was basically a biography of their own adventures in an insane fantasy world that mixed together Arthurian Legends, talking animals, peter pan, and freaking santa clause. I think the Every line spoken and character the cast encounter is a reference to some other work. Catching them was fun, but it often felt like the author relied a bit too much on them to make his work followable. I still don't understand a lot of the final book

Justin Miller

Finally just got out to see the movie in the theater last night. Came back to this post because I generally love your insight and writing, and wanted to check my experience against it. Which, in this case, is turning into a fascinating experience. In short, I had a blast with the movie, and was totally along for the ride they were setting up. However, I was also largely unacquainted with a lot of the references in it. It did occur to me, also not having read the book, that there's probably a delineation between choices Andy Weir made with his novel, and choices the directors made with the film adaptation, I would be curious to see that breakdown, and how many of these references came straight from the novel. As someone who is largely in favor of allowing for creative works to actually express the voice of its creators, I appreciate the angle you're coming from 100%. As someone who came to this movie pretty cold in terms of the people who made it and the references it contained, I didn't feel like that hindered my ability to enjoy the movie for what it is, even down to its creative construction. I really appreciated that the movie was brave enough to have a longer runtime (~2.5 Hrs), not so that it could jam in more scenes, but so it could let scenes be longer, and take their time. My most frequent complaint of media these days comes down to pacing, so I appreciated very much how this story paced itself. I also enjoyed other touches like the camera spinning into place when it goes to the flashback, as if we're still on a rotating spacecraft (or how your head would feel just coming off of one, I suppose). I still very much felt a voice in the movie. Gosling's character is informed by other things he's been in like Barbie, but I also felt the nuance, and in the end it felt appropriate. The movie takes a story with universal stakes, and manages to steep it in humor that had me laughing a lot, but it didn't feel jarring to me. It felt like I was in rhythm with how Grace was experiencing everything. He's a guy who's just in his lane, doing his best, and if he let himself get too caught up in the bigness of the problem, he would've melted down 100%. The movie almost coaxes you into the headspace where you're just trying to cope with an insane situation, which is finding the jokes and the silver linings. Ultimately, the references didn't bump me, and I really appreciate that too, I've honestly gotten sick of cross-referential media where the reference is in the spotlight, and they have to explain it to me because the movie loses all of its meaning if the Easter Egg isn't presented for me to find with no effort. The story's focus is so much more on the unexpected connection made across the vastness of space, and that story is big enough to take up all the room that could've been filled up by lampshading, but wasn't. I ended up crying as much as I laughed, and had an all-in-all fantastic experience. As a last note, I think it is fair to say "if the references aren't that deep, why are they included?". My only thought on that is that it makes some nods to other beloved sci-fi to let you know the authors are in on it too, and to help establish a space (heh) where the setting has some comfortable hallmarks. I certainly don't think it's necessary, for the story being told in this movie, to have those references, the story between Grace and Rocky is, in my opinion, the real thrust of the movie, and doesn't need the frills that would be added by Easter Eggs. But it was done in an unobtrusive way, so I care way less about the question to include them.