Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

There was a recent post about reviews on one of the FB groups once again, where said poster was discussing his personal review rating. And how, on Amazon, it seemed that 4 & 5 stars were given out like candy.

There were a lot of great replies to his post, from which the replies from authors boiled down to - anything less than 4.5 stars for many books is bad for sales. As such, any review below 4 stars, from the way Amazon has set-up the system is basically a negative review.

And that, unfortunately is true. The way Amazon has it set-up and the way our culture / world is set-up, anything less than 5 stars is considered bad.

Which is insane, when you think about it. There are books by Lois McMaster Bujold or Terry Pratchett that I wouldn't necessarily mark as 5 stars, and these are some of the greatest writers we have in contemporary times. But, that's my personal taste and beliefs.

What it does mean is that if a 'valid' review of 3 stars (which would one intuitively consider to be 'okay') appeared, it actually is a negative. It's why sometimes I wish that reviews could be made entirely personal, so that my personal thoughts could be recorded. If nothing else, it'd make keeping track of my reading easier.

It also leads me to my other thought about recommendations. Right now, I've started recommending books again - on my fan page, in my newsletter. For a time, I did and then I stopped due to concerns about some writers getting upset that I wasn't recommending their books. 

Now, I've gone back to recommending books that I've read and enjoyed, for one reason or another. I figure I don't really care anymore that much, though I'll still avoid saying negative things about other series in public. It's the best compromise I can make.

So. That's the long way of saying, if I'm recommending a book, it's generally because I enjoyed it. 

Note that just because I'm not recommending a series doesn't mean I don't like it - I might not have gotten around to reading it. Or I think it's just okay. Or I know I'm biased about the book and it's not a reasonable bias (i.e. I read the book while grumpy / not in a great mood and I know it colored my view).

This random, rather lengthy post brought to you by procrastination.

Comments

Richard Griffiths

theres 4 main authors i recommend you, dave willmarth , james hunter and michael scott earle.

michael nicholas

There a lot of authors that I recommend on twitter to support Litrpg and spread the word out there. The main four that i recommend without a doubt and review would be. Aleron Kong, you, Dakato Krout Luke Chmilenko, Shemer Kuznits, R.A Mejia, and still finding more amazing Authors daily.

Han Pol

The four too five star reviews are not just typically for amazon, but typical for most places where the general public can rate things. If there isn't an impartial Authority or a category were clear measurement is possible top level reviews are the norm. It's not like in hotels were the difference between a tow, four or five star ratings are well defined.

Han Pol

I will second that list.

Gio Dude

I read a lot and try to review what I've read, and my system goes as follows: 1- Unreadable 2-Read it, want my hours back 3-Read it - needs work but has potential *4*- Worth a read (if KU and watch-list for discounts in the future for a buy) 5- Worth buying right this instant I end up leaving fours more often than not, and 3's are always the hardest to leave. Sometimes I feel like the feedback I leave can be due to my own taste. I wish there were like a 3.5 to convey a 'should read, but needs work'. Oh well...