Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Let's start with a very important note. Not burntout. Not even close.

But...

There was an interesting discussion between myself and a few other authors about writing speed. Now, I'm a 'slow' writer. I get between 1-5k done, with an average of 3k each day. That works out to (roughly) one new book a month; not including editing and proofreading time. It's why most books release every 2-3 months.

You might note - that includes weekends. Yes. I write on the weekends too.

Anyway, the conversation on writing speed was because some authors write 1-2k and it's a stretch for them to do so. Others, like Michael Chatfield hits 5-10k a day.  I know of a few other authors who can hit that 10k number every day, punching out a book a month. Or more (60k books - Romance & Urban Fantasy mostly).

That's an insane output. As James pointed out, Jim Butcher has written 20 books in 20 years. He has written 20 books in 4.

Now, as Rusch has pointed out, most writers can write faster than the 1 book a year that was imposed by publishing houses.  That single release was more to do with them than the writing speed of the authors. But...

4-6 books a year seems to be a little on the high side too. So there's got to be a middle point, somewhere in-between.

As I'm now doing this full-time with very little other distractions, I keep having to ask myself, how much is too much? When I don't feel like writing, when the story isn't 'gelling'. Should I keep writing? If I do, as you guys have seen, 45k words can just get deleted.

But, if I don't discipline myself and write a few words, days can go by.  And even if I'm writing, how many is enough? 3k? 5k? 10k?

I can type at 100 WPM. So, by that number, I should be able to write 6000 words in an hour. In an 8 hour day, with say 5 hours of productive time, I should have 30k words done.

But obviously, I don't. So...

How much is too much? How much is too little? 

It's a weird dilemma. And one I'm still trying to find the balance on. 

Comments

Han Pol

Well at the end it's you who needs to decide what works best for you. Since you put a bunch of questionarks in your musing this is my answer to them. Of course as always it depends.... From my personal observation I would say that the Full time Autors who publish less frequently are more successful with their individual books. (of course with exceptions.) On the other Hand Stalin or who ever actually said it first was right when saying that "Quantity has a quality all of it's own." As you will sell more books if you write a greater Quantity of them and we have over all more to read of what we like. I think you said often enough that you are more pantser then plotter so I guess working significantly longer on a book wouldn't necessarily increase the overall quality of the book that much, and trying to increase the quality of a series like the System Apokalypse with already six books in, would be another poor economic decision. So for the SA and AoB I would try to be a little faster writing them, then you do currently as long as the quality doesn't suffer and you feel comfortable doing so. But if you start to write a new series you should maybe experiment, a little bit more, take your time and write a little slower with a hopeful increase in quality (and coppy's sold) of the book.

Tao Wong

Problem is that time spent taking my time writing on one series means everything else gets bumped back. I do think and I am going to try it on my next few books not actually physically writing but doing a very rough outline of what I want. Put things that I don't necessarily actively consider into writing. Among other things... the ending. Some parts of the middle. Theme (if any). Mood, etc. It might help a little more.