Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Poll

March-April Mini-poll on radio equipment

  • 1. Do it on the model, wires are necessary 15
  • 2. Do it separate, we don't need wires but want flexibility 16
  • 2025-02-18
  • 31 votes
{'title': 'March-April Mini-poll on radio equipment', 'choices': [{'text': '1. Do it on the model, wires are necessary', 'votes': 15}, {'text': "2. Do it separate, we don't need wires but want flexibility", 'votes': 16}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2025, 2, 18, 13, 12, 29, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 31}

Content

Hello guys!

So, while looking through references I've realized, that most of SSO operators used PTT (you know them, the big ones usually placed on upper chest) for their radios.

So, with them i have two ways to go:

1. Make both radio and PTT a part of model. It will allow me to make a wires connecting said PTT and radio to improve visuals, BUT it will limit the flexibility because some pouch slots will be taken

2. Make radio pouch and PTT two separate pieces you can install wherever you prefer, BUT this way they'll not be connected by wire thus giving less consistent look.

What are your opinions?

P.S. SitRep will probably be tomorrow, with some good news and eye candies. Stay tuned!

Comments

Paul Deehan

I think the placement of comms is pretty standardised. Having it on the model will save time and effort.

Steve

I agree Paul, I know when I served, a lot of pouches were Standardised, medic, dressings, etc, back then we didn't have personal radio, just yelling or hand signals, if other armies like the Australian army they are resistive to change.