The platform administration's response to my appeal (Patreon)

As official clarifications from the administration indicate, the criteria for evaluating publications are purely subjective. This confirms the possibility of removing content without objective and logical justification.

There is a tendency for an author's high popularity or regular publication of materials to become risk factors: publications can be cancelled based on their potential commercial benefits or audience reach. Such actions call into question the principles of fairness and transparency of the platform's rules.

I believe that each community member will be able to independently assess the current situation and draw appropriate conclusions about the bias of these measures against my work.