Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

The Japanese are working on peace with the U.S. They will deliver two proposals to President Roosevelt hoping to avoid war but American code breakers have already intercepted their proposals. Finding requests for peace but military positions set for war. It was clear the Japanese were preparing for something...

Did we get something wrong in our "Path to Pearl Harbor" video? Is there a particular character you wanted to hear more about? Feel free to ask our Extra History writer Rob it HERE and get a shout-out in our Extra History Lies Episode!

Missed an Episode?

Part 1 - Pacific Empires: Japan vs. USA | Part 2 - The Panay Incident I Part 3 - Release Date: First Strike I Part 4 - Countdown to War I Part 5 - Climb Mount Niitaka I Lies - Release Date: 1/7 I Music - Release Date: 1/6

Like the art? Download the 4k Wallpapers you see below!

Files

Previews only

Climb Mount Niitaka - The Path to Pearl Harbor #5 - Extra History

Enjoyed Path to Pearl Harbor? Then why not donate to GiveWell and get your donation matched (up to $100) through 12/31/2022. Go to https://www.givewell.org/ & before checkout, pick YouTube from “How did you hear about us”, and enter Extra Credits. The Japanese are working on peace with the U.S. They will deliver two proposals to President Roosevelt hoping to avoid war but American code breakers have already intercepted their proposals. Finding requests for peace but military positions set for war. It was clear the Japanese were preparing for something... *Miss an episode in our Pearl Harbor Series?* Part 1 - https://youtu.be/CxeiSM1edHE Part 2 - https://youtu.be/9lZDfVMOyK0 Part 3 - https://youtu.be/_8V9CKSx6Bg Part 4 - https://youtu.be/JEOyNwtFX3c Part 5 - Release Date: https://youtu.be/TqUBjJBqgQw Part 6 - Release Date: 12/31 Series Wrap-up / Lies Episode - Release Date: 1/7 Music From the Show - "4,000 Miles" - Release Date: 1/6 *Thanks for participating in this week's discussion!* Check out our community guidelines so we can have MORE high-quality conversations: https://www.extracredits.site/extra-credits-community-code-of-con *Want to support the people who make this show?* Become a Patreon Member & Vote on future Extra History episodes! http://bit.ly/EHPatreon Or show off your fandom with our merch! http://extracredits.store/ *Want more Extra Credits? Subscribe and follow us on social media!* Twitter: http://bit.ly/ECTweet Facebook: http://bit.ly/ECFBPage Instagram: http://bit.ly/ECisonInstagram Twitch: http://bit.ly/ECtwitch Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@extracreditz Website: http://extracredits.site/ *Interested in sponsoring an episode? Email us: extracredits@standard.tv* ♪ Music by Demetori: http://bit.ly/1EQA5N7 ♪ Outro Music: "4,000 Miles" by Tiffany Roman Download the Music on Patreon! #ExtraHistory #PearlHarbor #History

Comments

Martin Verran

You really cannot beat the Imperial Japanese Navy as party poopers. Also you got the colours of the German tricolour pre ~ 1918 wrong again.

John Cox

I see the artists easter egg of the ice princess. Very good. You know, it'd be interesting to see a short series (or at least a dedicated one-off) on the code breaker ladies.

chromicacid

@The Extra Credits Channel The subject caught my eye recently when I listened to a Planet Money podcast re-broadcast of a 2016 episode called, "When women stopped coding". https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2016/07/22/487069271/episode-576-when-women-stopped-coding The subject matter of the podcast is beyond the upper limits of when Extra History wants to handle, but I thought that you might still find it an interesting listen. In your episodes on Pearl Harbor, I'm hearing about ladies working deep in the math stuff and code breaking, but it seems that people like this just dropped off the radar sometime between then and now. According to the podcast, it appears to have been heavily affected by societal expectations of the kinds of toys that women wanted (clothes, dolls, cooking) vs what boys wanted (machines, electronics, computers), and that resulted in a lopsided boys-vs-girls early-life gain in technical skills that were exacerbated in evolving higher educational expectations that "you should know this by now". A bit depressing, true, but I found it interesting.