Home
Creators
Search Recent Missing Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Matt Talking Health Insurance Waste on Background Briefing with Ian Masters (Patreon)

Published:
2024-12-16 20:37:03
Imported:
2026-06
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • 2024_1216_1616-processed.mp3

Missing 2 full-res photos, 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

0.25 more hours of podtent

Files

Previews only

Comments

LP3

Only 17 more hours to go 🙏

LP3

Jk havent counted. Please keep making it rain content tho 🔥🔥🔥

John

Isn't releasing something on background a breach of journalistic integrity

TC
>>158476815

They should get experimental with it. Let's get an hour of ASMR fireplace crackles.

Burlington Vote Factory

Glad to hear the comparison to actual insurance, risk, and actuarial systems... reminds me of how mixing investment banking and regular banking was so catastrophic

Jonny

lmfao at the awkward laugh in response to the first question

Davíd

Gonna have to take the position that this counts as 0.125 hours since it's only 50% of the pod gang

Whitey

Maybe it's smart to avoid entering into ad-hoc denunciations of the moral bankruptcy of the US health system, but it sure is disappointing to hear Matt consistently back away from doing so.

cl

Matt, is that rcafdm guy on Twitter with the article about how healthcare spending in the US isn't unusually high just a right-wing troll? After seeing it shared by some "rationalist" types, I looked into the OECD data over the past 20 years, and it seems clear that even using his preferred measure of relative prosperity (the OECD household disposable income measure) the US is a very obvious outlier. The historical data on health spending vs. disposable income makes this extremely clear (whether looking at the past 20 years or the past 6 years since the 2017 graph he uses as the big money graph at the top of his article). Given all of the analyses and work (though I'd critique it as not particularly scientific), surely he must have noticed this.

TL
>>158476815

Lmao is this actually the current deficit?