Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Feedback request (Patreon)

Published:
2025-09-19 08:20:57
Imported:
2026-06

Content

So, this post is specifically for the last two posts.The switch is quite big, I understand that, but it's also not a full change - my main artstyle is not going anywhere soon. So far I'm thinking of my last two posts as kind of a "bonus" to other stuff.So, I kindly ask you, my supporters, for feedback, but not be too simple or too one-sided.

Please note positives and negatives side. Take into account the coloring, the texturing, compositions, new concepts, the presence or lack of text generation, backgrounds.

Comments

Bibs

The quality is still definitely insane ! Lots of details but nothing bugged or weird, really a pleasure to watch. I really love the text you made, it adds something cool, special mention to the cyberpunk set, those texts are fire ! The characters are still perfect, easy to recognize and looking like the show they come from, and the backgrounds are detailed and beautiful, the result is flawless. I don’t remember seeing someone with a similar style, and for me that really adds value to your work (originality is always good !). Your sets are still telling stories, which is perfect. We can notice the change of style/model, but the result is still the same : absolutely flawless, a freaking pleasure to watch ! If I had to give a “negative” point, I’d say the pictures seem a little darker with this model. The colors felt more bright and luminous with the previous one. But it’s not really a problem, just something I noticed. In fact, it’s hard to have a pertinent opinion with only 2 sets. The more you’re gonna use this style, the more I will be able to give you good feedback. PS : I ABSOLUTELY LOVE Rebecca, only one picture but damn ! She is freaking insane in it ! A pleasure for the eyes !

AleK

The model seems to do proportions and hands correctly and maybe it's better with unusual szenarios, positions, compositions, multiple characters etc... (I like how she pets the sad robot, btw). This is hard to judge since we only ever get to see the final results/picks and not the rejects. But there is a larger issue when it comes to consumers... For one, I subscribed to a specific style. So a new Style should inherently be one I see myself also subscribing to, which is a gamble, since not all here might have the same taste when it comes to different styles. If you wanna know if a certain style might have good pull, consider A-B-Testing. For example by posting works on other sites and compare interactions between the works in different styles. And for my personal experiences: I've seen a couple of AI-creators swich styles (I've been going back and forth between different ones over the last few months). And NONE of the ones who switched styles switched to a better one, imo. At one point I got a commission made and in the time between commissioning and posting there was an unannounced permanent change in the creators default-style. I think you can imagine my dissappointment here. For some reason the issues are the same across all cases: The newer styles seem to have more dull (desaturated) colors, lesser highlights and were more simplistic/sylized and seem to lack depth and... character(?). I don't know what's behind this. Maybe the models didn't incorporate as much artists in their training data (due to artist's backlash to this technology) or the models weren't initially intendet for this use or there might be some model cross-talk or even AI-incest at play or over-training, who knows.

CodeMistake
>>187701663

Very interesting and understandable take. Thanks for the time spent writing this, this is important to me

MDC

I agree with AleK on the premise of subscribing for a specific style and "look" and not really appreciating the big change when it doesn't feel like an across-the-board direct improvement in every way. I don't have the perspective to describe it in a very technical way but the current style just looks and feels like it has so much more appreciable life and dimension to it. The body proportions of the characters are nicer and more round, the faces (the eyes, the mouths) have a lot more detail, the image in general just has more of a three-dimensionality to it compared to the more flat and comic-y kind of style to the new style, and maybe the dark room lighting of the current style is a bit overplayed across so many posts but it just looks nice, it works and the shading and diffusion on characters' skins always just looks good. I would never want to be like "If you change your style I WILL CANCEL MY SUB blah blah blah" but it would probably go that way, I think you're probably the best AI porn person available atm and the look of your posts, along with some of the cute little bits of storytelling in them like the recent Mona set (which work really well not just in spite of the fact that they don't include text generation, but imo BECAUSE they're able to convey these tiny little stories without it), your sets just have a lot of character. If we're doing feedback time, I will also take my remaining time on the podium to speak for the masses and demand bigger breasts and more Fate/Stay Night girls. And more Jeanne too. Thank you.

Kaku

I just subbed today, so my perspective may not be worth as much. That being said, while I don't think the other style is as drastic a change compared to some others, it isn't what I would pick. But since it is still relatively close, maybe some tweaking would be an improvement all around since there is ine instance of a creator whose new model feels superior in every way to their old model.

CodeMistake
>>187768058

Holy damn, thanks for the compliment. Would you be against these arts if those were just some sort of bonus content, instead of actual replacement?

CodeMistake
>>187781598

Today or not, the opinion matters. Thanks for it. Would you mind it as some sort of bonus content? I'm not planning it as an actual replacement anyway