ZODIAC LIGHTS? WHAT THE HECK IS THIS? (Patreon)

Zodiac Light. Why Can't Experts Agree On Origin and Light Mechanics?

I spent three days reading up on the Zodiac Lights... Two years ago we predicted increase in the phenomenon. However convincing the infra red, the microwave, the xray imaging and mapping appears, nobody can agree on much of anything except that the false dawn and false dusk is created by "dust." When listening to the details of this cloud it mostly seems to contradict what is actually being seen by the naked eye. It shifts, and it's annual but not on the money annual. Used to be in September, now October for the false dawn. Nowhere in the research is the exact make up of the zodiac cloud espoused. We do see references to Sodium and Iron. But those are experiments being done in our own upper atmosphere. The articles are many. The explanations are many. One minor issue, much of it doesn't conform to what is observed by our own two eyes. First discovered by IRAS, (sound familiar) the dust cloud was hot but not scorching hot. Many of the science articles are available for a fee, the abstracts are free but tell you very little. What makes up the dust, why aren't planets leaving more defined cuts in the disk? Why is it warm? What kind of dust? If we are seeing scattered light then why sometimes such a focused beam or beams... since when does scattered light form an X in the sky or triangle? Also note that much literature exists on the cloud, but not until late do we see articles about the actual light. Although they do make sure that we know that zodiac light existed at the time of Mohamed. Ok! Like we can tell exactly what they were seeing 2,000 years ago. So why are all the science references on the cloud date into the 70's but articles on the light so recent? Like this decade only? why weren't we seeing zodiac light in the 70's 80's etc.