Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

We don't want to fixate on Ian, in fact his video was secondary in this episode, but his 5 year old video was more lore accurate and better edited than the most recent ones? How is that possible, and especially, why?For the rest, for how uninteresting it was and for the few mistakes he made in that one, it wasn't bad, just not entertaining.EPISODE 55

Files

Comments

Matthew Hicks

I remember when I was first getting heavily into the lore side of Warhammer 40k and one of Ian’s video was suggested on YouTube. It was the one of his early video where he goes through all of the Primarchs and their lore. In the video when he gets to the missing Primarchs he did this thing where he made it seem as though it was a corrupted audio file but he inserted his own lore for the Primarchs and wouldn’t you know it he says that the Primarch was a woman. Even at that time with the basic knowledge I had of the lore it really irritated he would push his own views into the lore so I immediately stopped the video and never watched another of Ian’s videos again. Happy though I continued my search and it lead me to your video on the Rangdan Xenocides. I loved your theory on the missing Primarchs and have been a fan ever since.

Greyork

Bradley should rename his channel again: Generally Badly ....