Home
Creators
Search Recent Missing Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

You Can't Get this On NPR | Lemonade Stand - Ep. 74 Premium [AUDIO] (Patreon)

Published:
2026-09-18 17:00:14
Edited:
2026-09-25 21:49:46
Imported:
Tags:

Downloads

Content

Recorded on: September 15th, 2026

TOPICS

0:00 Intro

1:35 AI Micro Drama In The Wild

4:40 Warnings about AI

10:30 We Must Pace the Frontier

21:50 What Will Drive Regulation?

28:13 Swedish Elections (Nordic Fun Fact)

36:20 Dignitaries Almost Killed in Ukraine

42:38 Clarity Act Doesn’t Pass

51:04 Wales Northern Ireland and Scotland

57:30 Waymo‘s Growth

1:00:52 Outro

Comments

Finn

Around 8am today, 10 state troopers walk onto my job site and arrest my coworker for domestic battery. Around 10am, my foreman gets into a screaming match with the general contractor, swings at him, and gets booted off the job. I have no work tomorrow as a result (not complaining). Around 1pm, this drops. I’m having a very entertaining day. Thanks gentlemen

Dominic Conway

To be honest I do not believe for a second these people would ever care about the safety of the average person. I bet the reason the AI companies are begging for regulation is to have a scapegoat to reduce spending. They’ve all made massive commitments and are selling bonds to pay for them. But if the government forces a slowdown then they have an excuse to not pay or renegotiate. I mean for crying out loud all the companies with IOUs are all pro-slowdown and the companies with UOMe’s are anti-slowdown. Products are getting better but rates are raising and companies still struggle to match revenue to spending.

A1

Im on the side of them slowing it down because 1. China can and will catch up soon. 2. They see limited growth from this point forward so they want to slow it down. 3. They're scared that more growth will gain nothing

Pattomega

The Ukraine hoax he's referring to is probably the quid pro-quo phonecall, no?

Cheesy

NUKULAR

Wormlover32

I think we need to stop treating any of these business people as public intellectuals. What dario, jensen and sam think is important only as far as it tells you where all their money and company resources are being directed. Predictions about use, social effects, international policy should be taken about as seriously as Mark zuckerberg telling us everyone will use the metaverse. That is, whatever they’re saying is just to influence investors/the public in some way to benefit their company. Because of course it is. That is the job of CEO. I understand that you guys state and understand the conflict of interest that these guys have. However, most discussions you guys have about AI are dominated by whatever the CEOs, or employees of these companies have been saying. I can almost guarantee you in the future that every discussion that included the opinions of economists, (non company aligned) AI researchers, sociologists, psychologists or other non-financially motivated thinkers are going to be far more insightful about what happened afterwards than those analysing whatever the CEOs said. Even only 3 years later this is true about any discussion happening in 2023 about AI.

nickotine

40:15 ngl this kind of sounds like a cs smoke bouncing on the ground maybe I been playing too much recently