Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

The start of the video is mostly the same so I've rendered this section instead of the full video. owo It takes a hot second to render out this video now haha 

Still need to fix up stuff in the video but overall a lot of the video is much closer to completion :3 yayIf you'd like to watch part1, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq8bU-3iecQ and watch up to around 17:04!

Files

[Patreon] Alpha Ver. 03 - Will AI Take Over Furry Commissions

Support my work: https://Patreon.com/PureKoor Support my Patreon with a dollar or more to have your name in the credits! The start of the video is mostly the same so I've rendered this section instead of the full video. owo It takes a hot second to render out this video now haha Still need to fix up stuff in the video but overall a lot of the video is much closer to completion :3 yay Watch Part 1 up to 17:04 then go back to this one if you haven't watch the original yet! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq8bU-3iecQ

Comments

Qazm

I watched this earlier when I boosted your toot (wow, that sounds weird…), and I don't fully think the situation of the operators is comparable, even if there are strong parallels. It probably depends on what the purpose of the commission is, though. Personally, when I look for/at art, I'm looking to experience ideas or concepts, and to some extent means of expression, that are unusual and foreign to me. I don't know why or how exactly, but for me AI art usually¹ pushes the "this is uncanny" button less than the "this is actively boring" button, and the latter impression is usually how I notice it when mixed into other content. The situation is likely different for art that's commissioned mainly as a means to realise an idea, though. Personally that doesn't do a lot for me, and I think I somehow so far lived in an environment where I actually didn't see that being done a lot, but it seems that's not necessarily an uncommon reason to commission someone? Hm… I'm actually not sure what percentage of furry commissions are people calling to hear the operator vs. getting patched through to the other end, though. My perspective is at best myopic in that regard. I think something like a YCH commission usually very much falls in the former category though, even if parts of the process could be automated eventually. (Pretty sure current tech can't compose characters, scenes and styles cleanly enough quite yet.) Maybe it's a bit like programming where ChatGPT can handle some largely rote tasks with not-great-but-still-useful accuracy now. I'm not too concerned because that's the part of the job that I outright hate, but a friend's genuinely worried that this tech will replace him outright since so far that seems to be what he's proficient at. (The reason I personally don't touch it is that I find the copyright laundering objectionable, but that sort of issue has never stopped a capitalist I'd say.) Sorry, this turned into a bit of a wall of text of a comment. Hopefully it still makes sense. ¹ I have a friend who's amazingly good at making it make photorealistic-ish renders of things that are viscerally revolting on an instinctual level. I guess it makes sense that a program that was created to push buttons and trained on the web at large would be good at pushing those buttons in particular (too), but wow. It makes me genuinely concerned about what's in that training set.

PureKoor

haha. giving toots is a time in my experience, people want the experience of art (like chess) or want the output (operator) I think most furries will want the result once the ai has enough data to produce better works. YCH is generally idea generation which ai can already do. or is based on scarcity, which weirdly ai wouldn't help with because authority is the goal. closed species is a good example of that. honestly we're lucky that NFTs were hated, otherwise cs people would have made furry NFTs. people will probably be replaced. once something is automated, people will work on the next thing to automate. its a cycle that should be a good thing. the next video part discusses that copyright is the idea that concepts are property in which a single owner can have. which is capitalist in it of itself. that's why caps use it a lot and why socialists tend to want the owner to be a wider group of people, even for art there's a video about how nonprofits are used to launder IP to gain money with angering others. if i can find it ill send it :3