Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Hey all!

Something slightly different this time round. I thought I'd take a look at the debate surrounding academic writing styles, complexity and accessibility.

Hopefully it might spark some interesting debate!

And thanks again to everyone who joined in with the livestream on Wednesday, it was great fun and I'm definitely thinking of doing it again sometime.

Thanks as ever for your support!

Tom

Files

Previews only

Why is Academic Writing so Boring? | Tom Nicholas

Academic books and journal articles can be pretty boring. Academic writing is often highly complex, uses lengthy sentences and endless amounts of specialist terminology. In today's video, which brings together both my What the Theory? series and Essay Tips series, I take a look at why this might be the case. Drawing on articles by Steven Pinker, Judith Butler and many other scholars, I dive into the debate over academic writing styles to ask whether academics are simply being self-indulgent when they sit down to write essays, academic papers, books and journal articles or whether there might be a good reason for their work not always being wholly accessible to a general audience. Following on from this, I then take a look at the politics of style to consider whether, sometimes, the use of complex and hard-to-understand language might be necessary to critique the society and culture around us. Support the channel on Patreon at http://patreon.com/tomnicholas If you've enjoyed this video and would like to see more including my What The Theory? series in which I provide some snappy introductions to key theories in the humanities, as well as video essays and more, then do consider subscribing. Thanks for watching! Twitter: @Tom_Nicholas Instagram: @TomNicholasWTF Patreon: http://patreon.com/tomnicholas Website: [www.tomnicholas.com](http://www.tomnicholas.com/) Music Credits Rhodesia by Twin Musicom is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Artist: http://www.twinmusicom.org/ #academicwriting #university #philosophy

Comments

Linnea

This is a great video! I have a feeling this could blow up in academic circles. I said this in my comment on the video too but I asked my prof for clarification on some statements in Frames of War and he didn't know either, we were stuck with a handful of different interpretations. I worry that exercises in simplifying academic jargon costs some nuance - I've grown old reading and disagreeing with other people's interpretations of Foucault because it's easier for universities to teach someone's summary than to teach the entirety of Discipline and Punish (can't blame them, it would be totally impractical!)

Tom Nicholas

Thank you, really glad you thought so! I definitely agree with you about the problems that come with simplifying a lot of nuances. Particularly, I think we have the tendency to present lots of theorists as having had "game-changing" insights whereas they're own work is slightly more cautious...

Linnea

I wonder if it's the "great men of history" tendency in our thinking also where we attribute major developments in thought or science or society to an individual almost in isolation rather than to the multitude of people and factors involved in significant shifts