Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

by Keith Phipps

I think there’s a pretty simple response to the bad take getting passed around like spoiled milk yesterday, and it’s this: Black Widow opened to $80 million this weekend and did fine on Premiere Access streaming as well. (It must have done fine, given that Disney doesn’t usually disclose numbers.) I also don’t think there’s better response than this tweet from Criterion’s Ashley Clark.

There are reasons to be worried about the theatrical experience, sure, and plenty of them. But that poorly argued op-ed didn’t really lay out any of them. I like big blockbusters just fine, but I don’t know how seriously we should take a writer who only returned to theaters, and then reluctantly, because of F9. It might be a case of someone who’s covered tech innovation and disruption to the point that they’ve become blind to the possibility that the old ways of doing things have endured because they work. And, honestly, I think the biggest threat to movie theaters is that they’ve become synonymous with blockbusters. Every other sort of movie can be watched at home, but if you want to see the Fast/Furious crew blast into space you have to make the trip the nearest multiplex.

I do worry about movie theaters. There are institutions I’d never thought I’d see endangered, like record stores, or made all but extinct, like video stores, and technological disruption has everything to do with the problems both have encountered. But I think if we treat every opinion handed down as true, particularly one that seems to have been dashed off in 10 minutes with little care taken to back up a personal instinct with facts, it might become a kind of fait accompli. Have you heard the bad news? Movie theaters are dead.

The Black Widow numbers suggest otherwise. I hope they’re indicative of a turning tide, but I don’t know if we’ll know for sure until there’s a Covid-19 vaccine for kids under 12 — I’m still hesitant to bring mine back to theaters — and arthouses have been opened long enough to see if their patrons haven’t gotten out of the habit. (Anecdotally, it doesn’t seem as if they have.)

You know, I didn’t even want to respond to that op-ed, but the problem with social media — well, a problem with social media — is that these awful opinions get bounced around and amplified until it almost seems like you’re required to respond to them. And maybe this newsletter is part of the problem. If so, I apologize. I’ll make it up by going to the movies this week.

If you want worries about another aspect of contemporary filmgoing, check out our latest episode on streaming services. It began as a bonus episode for you, dear Patreon supporters, but we ended up dropping it in the main feed because it went so long and covered so much ground (and we had a scheduling emergency).

For better takes, you could also read any of these articles.

• At Vulture, E. Alex Jung talked to the great Jennifer Coolidge.

• For GQ, Keith Phipps talked to Christian Slater about playing good guys and getting older.

• At Polygon, Faefyx Collington discussed Luca, Pixar, and queer representation.

Files

Comments

Mark

I think the same day the Times had an article about the resurgence of drive-ins during the pandemic (or maybe I ended up on it several related clicks in). Particularly the Mahoning in Pennsylvania (by doing non-recent release movies on film).

Jamie Vann Struth

I was unaware of the article until this newsletter, so yup, you're amplifying it. I'd be quite happy if you didn't feel obligated to bring up idiotic arguments just because other people are talking about them. Which is actually something I don't like about your show - you often mention whenever a film is getting negative blowback for whatever reason, often when your crew doesn't think it's valid, but you seem to feel obligated to talk about it. If you think a criticism is invalid, please don't bother bringing it up just because people on Twitter are making a fuss. That's what people on Twitter do. Most of the filmgoing population is not on Twitter and is not paying attention to these arguments.

Scott Tobias

Point taken, Jamie, on amplifying idiotic opinions, which is certainly something Twitter makes easy to do. Entire political careers are being built off politicians tweeting crazy things, getting dogpiled on social media, and then turning that dynamic into clout. However, there are times when arguments surrounding a film do have to be addressed, from the accusations of colorism in In The Heights to the Amazon brouhaha in Nomadland. And this week, we will surely be talking about the use of A.I. to fill in Anthony Bourdain's voice in Roadrunner, along with the director's decision not to seek an interview with Asia Argento. Nevertheless, you've given us something to think about here w/r/t when a certain quality threshold has been crossed or not.