Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

by Keith Phipps

We’re in the middle of awards season, the stretch of the movie year that more or less spans from TIFF in September through Oscars night in March. December is usually when publications and critics groups release their best films list, sometimes in early December. From the inside, that means watching a lot of movies but never feeling like you’ve seen enough. Because you haven’t. There’s just too much.

For me, this year seems worse than most. I just filed my list for the Indiewire poll, which will probably look different from the list I submit for the Chicago Film Critics Association in a few days, by which time I will (hopefully) have had a chance to see some more movies. And it will certainly look different from the list to be featured on our end-of-the-year episode and over at The Reveal, which won’t be done until a couple of weeks from now. But that list will undoubtedly be different from a 2021 list I would make a year for now, in part to how weird release strategies have gotten.

To wit: Judas and the Black Messiah was a 2020 film for awards purposes last year (partly because of the Covid-ness of the year) but we didn’t get a chance to see it until 2021. So where should it fall? Same with The Father, which had a qualifying run last year but wasn’t really made available, even to critics, until later. Both are excellent, but should they count? If nothing else, they feel like last year’s films, even if they aren’t.

2021 is no different. We’ve received screeners for much-lauded films like The Worst Person in the World and Petite Maman, which won’t be seen by most viewers until 2022. But should they count? If a great movie plays a single theater in Brooklyn for a week does it make a noise?

I don’t have an answer for this and haven't figured out what I’m going to do about the 2021 list. But I get the feeling that it must be frustrating for those outside the profession who love movies and want to consider the year that was to see a bunch of movies listed that they’ve never had a chance to see and a bunch ignored that made a deep impression in the previous year. So, consider this a prompt. What do you want out of Top 10 lists? A reflection of the year you experienced? A checklist of what to see next? Some combination of the above?

While you ponder that, we hope you’re enjoying our Imitation of Life / Passing episodes. Don’t forget to send some feedback. We’d love your thoughts. And if you’re looking for something to read, may we recommend the following?

• At Vulture, Kathryn VanArendonk ponders the mysteries of Succession’s Tom Wambsgans.

• At Polygon, Joshua Rivera suggests that maybe Star Wars is better off without Star Wars movies.

• Also at Vulture, Matthew Jacobs talks to Laura Dern about Citizen Ruth.

• Why has movie dialogue gotten so hard to understand? Ben Pearson goes deep with the question at /Film.

• At ScreenCrush, Matt Singer talked to James Cameron about the Spider-Man movie he almost made.

• And at The Reveal you’ll find Scott Tobias writing about Drive My Car and the year of Hamaguchi, Keith Phipps revisiting Menace II Society, and reviews of Benedetta, The Hand of God, and Flee.

Files

Comments

Ross C

Awards Season and end-of-year lists are just the main problem with current movie releases, MAGNIFIED. Hollywood is pretending things are back to normal, but a huge percentage of the population (and some critics) are still hesitant to return to theaters. I finally managed to see Shang-chi on Disney+, but the hype and conversation had totally died by then. I braved a sparsely attended showing of The Eternals a while ago, but I suspect it will be more of a 2022 release for the average viewer. It seems the "Film X must play Y many days in such and such a theater" rule is completely unrealistic in the current climate. I think the urge to live in a post-covid world is negatively affecting the real one.

Ed C.

For my own list-making purposes, I define a movie's year as whenever it received a non-festival theatrical release of any sort in the US or when it received a streaming or home video release in the US. So both Father and Judas and the Black Messiah are 2021 movies. I also keep updating my list (which is literally a Letterboxd list) until the Oscars. Once the Oscars occur, I stop updating it.

jamsheed siyar

Yeah, this is a genuinely difficult I think. Maybe the ideal solution is to do one best-of list near the end of December and then another one for the same year in February! Short of that, I think it does make sense to do a best-of list near or at the end of the year—and my preference would be to include what you’ve seen from the 2021 awards season but also late breaking stuff from 2020 that didn’t make it in the 2020 list but would’ve/should’ve. So that it’s a bit of reflection on the past year and a bit of looking forward to the coming winter.

Devon Shaddick

Man, I find this issue so frustrating! I like to include films on my list of films I saw from a given year based on their US release date even though I'm in Canada cause that helps align my lists with other peoples, but this end of year thing where small arthouse and international films end up not getting screened until the new year when I think of them so clearly as being a part of the previous one just does my head in. Like currently I've got Memoria, Worst Person in the World, Petite Maman and A Hero all sitting on my 2021 list, but with absolutely no idea when any of them will actually play here. Currently I have The Father listed as a 2020 release even though it didn't come out here until March, but Judas as 2021 because it really had no non-critics screening in North America until this year, but I might change that cause it just isn't a 2021 film. I don't put any of this on critics though and I think sticking with oscar qualification rules still makes the most sense, I just wish they forced studios to actually play these movies in at least a couple more cities to qualify, instead of just two screenings in LA on the 31st or whatever.

Green-billed Magpie

to some extent this has always been a problem with year end lists, where people reading them most likely haven't had a chance to see all of them yet, as some big names get "released" in NY/LA just before the end of the year. but it takes a whole new turn when most *critics* still haven't seen a film in the year it was nominally released