Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

By Keith Phipps

But nothing big. Don't panic. 

Your four Next Picture Show co-hosts recently held a State of the Podcast summit (i.e. an evening Zoom call) to talk about how things are going. And, basically, we think things are going fine. But, six years in, we want to shake things up just a little bit, mostly by trimming the fat, getting to the heart of the episode a little faster, and moving some of the extraneous elements elsewhere.

Specifically, we've decided to implement tighter intros and bring a couple of elements of the show to the Patreon in various ways. Feedback will now be here in the Patreon feed (and open to everyone, whether or not they subscribe). And rather than packing Next Picture Show recommendations into the end of the episode (by which point we're all pretty tired and suspect our listeners are as well) we're making the recommendation segment its own recurring bonus episode.

And that's pretty much it. But, as long as we're talking changes, let's open the door to you. What are you enjoying about the show? What could you do without? Are there any kind of pairings you like better than others? (E.g. Remakes / Originals vs. Early Film by Director / Later Film by Director vs. Thematic connections, etc.) Any guests you'd love for us to invite back? The comments are open. (And we're leaving this open to non-Patreon subscribers, too, so we can get even more feedback.)

In the meantime, here's to another 2022 full of fun pairings.

Files

Comments

Sean McGivern

My favourite pairings are less easy to pick in advance: I like it when there's one very good film and one interesting-but-deeply-flawed film. I liked all the guests, more guests would be great!

John Donovan

One small thing is it would helpful if you said where you can find the movies when you first announce the pairing rather than (or in addition to) the end of the second episode, after many have presumably already watched the movies.

Jonathan Anderson

I saw "change" and was prepared to tear my garments and wail, get all Biblical, but then y'all made reasonable changes and now I don't know what to do! It's a relatively small thing, but I like as often as possible to watch the films being discussed before I listen to the show and as such I sometimes fall behind by design. The one thing this makes difficult is I then have to fast forward and skip around a bit to find what you're covering next week at the end of the second episode of a pair. Could something be put in the episode description saying "Join us next week for "Death Bed: The Bed That Eats" and Fran Kranz's Mass!" or something else along those lines?

Greg Pace

(This might happen anyway, due to the changes you just listed but:) Sometimes you all rush through the discussion of the new release to get to the comparison portion, whereas the older film in Part 1 always gets a full episode breakdown. I hope with the changes, you're all able to go more in depth on the newly released film.

Devon Shaddick

Honestly, I enjoy the podcast very much as it is, though I'm sure I'll get used to the minor tweaks y'all are making. Count me as another person glad for Keith's early reassurance to not panic in that regard. I like the director and remake/reboot pairings fine enough, but I've always especially enjoyed when you guys talk about two films that aren't so obviously connected, yet parallel each other in fun and interesting ways. I'd echo the comment about posting the upcoming pairing somewhere, either in the podcast notes or twitter or whatnot. Also, if it's possible, could we get the patreon version of the episodes without the plugs for the patreon; assuming it's not too much work for Genevieve?

Padraic Coffey

I absolutely love your podcast, but if I had one criticism, it would be that you don't cover enough older films. You've done over 300 episodes, but only six of the films you've covered are from the 1940s, and nine from the 1950s. Compare that to 40 films from the 1990s you've covered, or the 24 films from 2000-2009. More episodes on the likes of Nightmare Alley (1947) and Imitation of Life, please.

Green-billed Magpie

don't shorten the intros too much, Keith! I love the scripted opens and keynotes!

jamsheed siyar

love the pod and happy to follow wherever you all lead. the one thing I’ll say is I like openness and sometimes-unexpectedness of the pairings very much. I think making it original vs. remakes or always the same director would make it significantly less interesting.

Edward Savoy

While I love the panelists as is and don’t have a “need” for guests, having Emily VanDerWerf/Emily St James back would be lovely, and I think the hosts of Blank Check could conceivably play well with your dynamic either together or solo.

Ed C.

I think these structural changes make a great deal of sense. My only feedback is about the new movie picks (and, of course, those are contingent on what new releases are coming out). I'm sure every listener will give feedback that's "more of the movies I like; fewer of the movies I don't", but I'd like to see fewer kids animated movies, fewer "straight" docs (stuff like Roadrunner or Tina), and fewer movies that we all know are going to be turds going in (Mortal Kombat).

Brendan Steele

2 thoughts: I like the "thematic connections" pairings the best. Also, as far as guests go, I really enjoyed the Dune discussion with John Hodgman at The Reveal and I think he'd make a great guest for an episode.

Jason B.

I agree with Gregg Pace's suggestion. It sometimes feels like the new releases don't get enough room to breathe. In terms of guests, it warms my heart when old friends from the AV Club like Noel Murray or Emily Vanderwerf sit in, so I'd love to see more of that. Mike D'Angelo? Sean O'Neal? Nathan Rabin? Donna Bowman? And wow, has it really been six years?

Zef Wagner

I think the changes sound great overall. I guess my only real feedback is that I really like thematic connections or director/writer connections, but I don't really like the "original/remake" version, like you did with Nightmare Alley. It falls into a similar trap of reading a book too close to watching the movie, where it feels like everything becomes about comparing two similar adaptations of the same thing, or a remake of an original thing, and they don't stand by themselves enough. Also it makes the episodes a bit repetitive when both films have the same story.

Jamie Vann Struth

I like having the mix of different types of pairings, although agree with an earlier comment that original/remake (a la Nightmare Alley) is my least favourite. I heartily applaud the splitting off of the Recommendations to its own episode. I only listen to episodes once I've watched the movie, so either I wait until I've gotten around to a film before hearing the recommendations that come after, or if it's a movie I don't intend to watch, I'll skip through the file and try to find where the recommendations start. Otherwise, the changes all sound reasonable. Oh, I also would love to have more pre-1980 movies in the pairings.