Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

I've been thinking a lot this week about Lane Brown's recent Vulture piece "TVs Are Too Good Now," which explains why the latest and greatest movies played on the latest and greatest home electronics equipment can look kind of bad. You should read the whole piece, but the gist of it is this: 4K TVs are essentially too high-res for most CGI effects, which are rendered in 2K. When watched in a projected film this discrepancy blends in better than it does at home. (TV effects are usually rendered in 4K but this pushes against pre-existing budget constraints so they don't always turn out looking so well, either.)

It's not the only way TVs have gotten better than ever in ways the experience watching them has not. Has anyone tried watching Seinfeld on Netflix? A nightmare! It's blown up to fit the 16:9 frame and the picture quality looks almost VHS-like. (I've seen better-looking public-domain films on Prime Video.) It might look okay on an iPad or a laptop but on a television it's basically unwatchable. It's hardly the only show to suffer from an attempt to bring it up to date for modern TVs, either. Remember when Buffy the Vampire Slayer got a badly received HD remaster a few years back? Hold onto your physical media. (Or buy it for the first time. A lot of it is dirt cheap these days.)

There's a flip side to this, however. As Brown mentions in the piece, old movies look great. Not all old movies, of course. Nobody likes what James Cameron did to T2, for instance, and some studios (and even directors) have erred on the side of smoothing out the grain and making the colors look too contemporary. But I can't recommend enough the experience of watching a truly great HD/UHD transfer of an older film. E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial, for instance, looks amazing in 4K, and companies like Criterion know how to merge the old and new like nobody's business. One of the first films I watched after upgrading my system a few years back was Michael Curtiz's The Breaking Point on a Criterion Blu-ray. The grain, readers... the glorious, glorious film grain.

So is it a problem when the effects in, say, Shang-Chi look janky at home? For sure. The HD/4K era has introduced a slew of problems, including the mistreatment of old material in the name of remastering. But the right movie on one of these newfangled screens can be breathtaking. So let me throw out a question: on the whole, are we living in a new golden age of home viewing, or do the problems overwhelm the benefits?

Files

Comments

Squozen

As somebody who doesn’t really go for the bam-pow movies, my 4K OLED is doing me just fine. What’s more of an issue than 2K CGI is the low bitrate that Netflix delivers.

Jonathan Anderson

The show I feel bad for (at the moment) is Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. At least it seems like the rumor mill, for what it's worth, is starting to sound like Paramount is once again leaning towards remastering them at some point. It didn't sound as hopeful before the What We Left Behind documentary.

nattyn8

There’s that great speech in The Worst Person in the World which really is my 50 year old self talking to my 25 year old self spending countless hours in used record stores and video stores in the 80s and 90s……but not just about finding the media and collecting it and wasn’t that a folly because one day 90% of it would be at my fingertips anywhere one has an internet connection, but also because the quality possible by returning to original film elements for things like The Third Man mean that we can see that movie at home looking better than any audience ever could back in the day. Not everything is available in watchable quality. Try to find the silent film classics like Ben Hur in something that looks better than vhs quality and you’ll see what I mean. And not everything is even available (looking at you Bigelow and Cameron). But for the most part both access and quality are so vastly better now than at any time in the history of cinema — not just for current domestic large budget releases but for tens of thousands of historical international releases, indies, etc that it is a true golden age even if imperfect.

Zef Wagner

I still enjoy physical media and usually buy Blu-ray or 4K UHD discs of my favorite films. Not that I find the time too often to watch them, but I'm glad to have the option to watch it "someday" and to have the special features. And I've definitely compared the 4K streaming to Blu-ray (most recently with The Matrix) and found the Blu-ray is vastly better. I haven't really noticed this issue with CGI looking bad on 4K, but I guess I watch most CGI-heavy movies in the theater and then never revisit them. Or if I do, it's with a podcast commentary or something (Blank Check patreon!) and I'm not paying too much attention to the visuals.