Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Emergency Upload! D&D Is D.O.A. (Extended) (Patreon)

Published:
2023-04-03 00:44:24
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Videos

Content

D&D: Honor Among Thieves grossed an anemic $38.5 million over 4 days, far below expectations. PDM reviews the film and explain why. Strap in.

If you have trouble viewing this content, try a different device or OS.


Files

Previews only

D&D Movie Bombs.mp4

Comments

Bagel-Man

Just saw the movie yesterday, it was great.

Randy Smith

6 of 8 of our play group watched the movie together and all enjoyed it, would see it again and want a sequel.

Joshua Owens

Solid analysis as always. I did like the movie. That being said, I a large part of that “liking” is based on the comparison with the previous D&D movie and that three of my children are teenagers and enjoyed the movie. Thanks again for the deeper dive.

Ron F.

Yeah, I disagree on whether the movie was good. However, not acknowledging the co-creators is bogus. But here's the thing about the D&D brand: Hasbro couldn't care less about the gamers or the game. They want D&D to be the new Marvel. They need more casual fans to see the movies and buy the merchandise. Any catering to gamers is just to establish momentum. So things like acknowledging the co-creators are not on the top of mind for them. Just my thoughts.

Chris Baker

I thoroughly enjoyed it, seeing it again, and would like a sequel. It seems it's purpose was strictly to entertain, which I appreciate as so many now want to shove an agenda down your throat.

Mark Hanson

I really have no opinion on this film, other than I will wait for it to stream before I watch it.40 Million isn't great though. If it has legs and doesn't drop much next weekend it has a chance to break even, but the Super Mario movie comes out next weekend and I think it is going to kill for the Easter weekend.

Chris Baker
>>105507795

Agreed. But I'd also add that even Gary Con never mentions Dave Arneson. I get that it's a con celebrating Gary specifically, but the narrative is Gygax invented it. The term "co-creator" is never used. Everyone wants to rewrite history.

A Name Apart

Honor among thieves was not Iron Man 1 it is more like the current Marvel movies. I can appreciate that many d&d fans got to see their hobby on the big screen and I also appreciate the distinction between Hasbro wanting D&D to be more like Marvel and many people liking that more super hero type feel. Because then I can just say, "I am more into the grimdark and OSR type stuff." Let people choose what they like rather than only having one choice owned by a large corporation.

Bagel-Man
>>105506721

Thanks! I agree with you though about the Gygax and Arneson credit exclusion, it’s a shame.

baldrage

I am shocked it knocked John Wick 4 out of the top spot, but hard to imagine this movie having any legs.

David Ford

I just saw it today with my wife. I enjoyed it for what it was. My wife, who has no interest in D&D (and never will), enjoyed it also. I do agree that the movie started slow but it found its legs during that aforementioned Druid shape shifting getaway scene. I too had a pause with the lack of acknowledgment of D&D’s creators, but that’s been WOTC mode of business.

MrGunn

Shazam! PDM harshes on the: “D&D: Honour Amongst Thieves” movie. Calls it a Pine scented cinematic turd. Worst of all, Hasbro takes credit for “creating D&D”, though strangely PDM loves actually Hugh Grant’s performance. Tell us how you really feel Professor? Great review, but you sooo triggered me when you said; D&D is set in the Middle Ages and their should be no prisons or parole?!? What, now you want internal consistency and a facsimile of Western European medieval law and economics! You can’t ask for that, D&D has always had the thinnest veneer of reality tacked on to a high fantasy setting, with virtually no internal consistency and zero verisimilitude. If this had been HarnWorld, I might have cut you some slack. No sir, 99.9% of D&D worlds make make no sense whatsoever, so let’s all just suspend disbelief and trudge on. As to Hasbro, they are floundering because they don’t know what they want to be: a toy company, a board game company, a computer game company, a collectible card game company; they just don’t know. Furthermore, as far as D&D goes, Sr Leadership has no idea who their customers are, they don’t play the game and they don’t talk to gamers. They may be trying to fix that, but this odd attempt to brainwash Youtuberatti and Twit-ch celebs seems it will fall flat too. No, WorstC has so alienated their base, OneD&D will have to be spectacular to win back some semblance of community goodwill. Glad you saw the movie and did this review, saves me fifty bucks and I get retain two hours of my life. Sadly after six years, I still have no reason to go to the cinema. PS Glad to see DB is back and as pithy as ever.

MrGunn
>>105509303

John Wick 4, you mean the ballet with bullets and bad dialogue?

Giulliano Salgarello

Professor if you would like some feedback, deathbringers phrase at the end was very good but it could be more spicy and it was almost perfect. It could be "this studios is dropping franchises dead faster then I do goblins" lol. Nice video overall.

Gregory Helding

I found it very entertaining and so did everyone I saw it with at Gary Con (Grognards and noobs alike). One thing though - when the crowd I was with saw "Hasbro's Dungeons and Dragons" in the credits, we all booed - LOUDLY. The trouble with the Dragonlance characters is that no one outside of the D&D community knows them. Everyone knows Optimus Prime.

Ben Waters

As an RPG fan who isn't a fan of the D&D brand, I would have seen the movie in theaters if the OGL controversy hadn't happened. I'm staying home on principle at this point.

Jeff Jones

I thought it was a good popcorn movie. No more no less.

Andrew
>>105508648

I think I've explored this in other posts, but I thought this would have been the case. I completely agree with you--Dragon Lance should have been their first effort, and it could have been the first shaft into a deep, very rich gold mine. You could have a PG series (Dragon Lance would be my first choice), PG-13 series movies (Drizzt and the Icewind Dale trilogy), and R (Greyhawk or Dark Sun or both) series movies, capturing every age group. But the first step and most important step is in hiring really good writers who are able to faithfully adapt stories and worlds to the screen, and who are genuine fans of the worlds they are translating. You then need a good set of directors, and a talented cast. But it starts with the scripts---always!

Matthew Smiley

Have not seen the movie yet. I’m not gonna lie seeing the title in my email I was hoping you were talking about one D&D virtual. The take on The movie makes me sad because they just can’t seem to make this work like any of the other fantasy properties that have.

Graymaulken

I must say, after taking my kids to see it and not expecting much from it, I must say I was shockingly surprised how much I enjoyed it. I really liked Chris Pine, but I think Hugh Grant and Michelle Rodriguez were poor casting choices. Grant appeared to me to be annoyed at having to be on screen. His performance was choppy and chaotic and totally unbelievable as a criminal mastermind. Shrek would have been more believable. Rodriguez is a great actress, but seemed disinterested in playing her part, especially when it came to her supposed “connection” to Pine’s daughter. The worst part was her resurrection and how unconvincing her “I can’t believe you chose me” speech. That was just terrible. The rest of the film I thought moved along nicely. I never felt that it dragged, and the nostalgia it inspired was awesome. I did find it funny that you said DnD was set in medieval times, cause l never got that impression ever when playing it. To me it was always a “forgotten realm” that wasn’t beholden to any set time in history. But I imagine DnD was like that for a lot of folks. It was whatever they saw it as, just like you saw it as medieval. I think the writers nailed it. Unfortunately, I don’t know that it will cater much to ppl who are not DnD fans. It doesn’t have a lot to offer them in the way of new and inventive movie storytelling. But it was a fun ride for me. I’ll watch it several more times when it hits Paramount+.

Craig Sutherland

I actually enjoyed the movie. You kind of know what you are getting from the trailers, but I will say it was better than I thought it would be. Interestingly, my Mother really wants to see it having no interest at all in fantasy or knowledge of D&D other than knowing it is a game I have played since childhood. I have a few work colleagues and non gaming friends who are all wanting to see it as well, word of mouth is going around that it is a good movie surprisingly, so this one may have some longer legs at the box office. Although some pretty stiff competition is coming up with the Super Mario Bros Movie in a couple of days - I suspect that one is going to run away with a fortune! I will say one thing about the effects, they used a lot more practical effects than I anticipated, and I thought that added quite a bit to the enjoyment of it. This movie is by no means a cinematic classic, but it lives quite comfortably in the realm of good popcorn movies, with some of the better Marvel movies. In fact I think this is stronger than the average Marvel movie. One of the standout scenes for me was the sequence when they cast speak with dead - which was featured in the trailer - it was a longer scene that was quite cleverly put together. I think overall this movie had a lot of heart and even if it doesn't turn into a sprawling cinematic universe as they hope, I'm glad this was made. At the end of the day it is impossible to really adapt D&D into a movie. I can understand why they wouldn't have made a Drizzt movie or Dragonlance out the door, and I imagine it has a lot to do with royalities back to the original creators. The thing we all love about RPGs and especially the old school gaming most of us in this community love is nigh impossible to adapt to a movie (although I salivate at the idea of a classic adventure module being adapted), as the hobby isn't a one to one transfer to the film medium. I don't think that even the most popular D&D characters like Drizzt could draw a major audience like Transformers does (Transformers was being adapted from a well loved television series for one, so it was much closer to the film format in adaptation and the characters were already very well known). I do agree though that it was poor taste to not have a nod to Gygax in Arneson in the credits, but I wasn't terribly surprised either. Come to think of it - was there an Ed Greenwood mention for the Forgotten Realms? Adding 'Hasboro's Dungeons and Dragons' was pretty lame too. Thanks for the thoughtful review PDM! Although we have differing opinions on the movie overall, I do think this video was excellent and you made a really good case for your review!

Jay

PDM, great movie review with all the details and supporting metrics I expected. I can clearly understand your anger and disappointment with Hazbro attempting to claim they invented D&D. As for the rest, I will take it under advisement and eventually see the movie at some point down the line. Opinions will always vary in instances such as movies so I will save mine until after I see the it and then keep it to myself. I mean who cares about the opinions of random strangers using anonymous/fony monikers anyway. The way I see it, people like to formulate their own opinions as to what they find entertaining and sometimes seek out those who they find credible critics for reviews if they are on the fence about seeing something. Never-the-less, they will still draw their own conclusions to like, dislike, or whether or not even go to see a movie regardless of what anyone else might think and in my opinion that’s the way to go. Only an individual can determine what they find entertaining or not. Would be boring if we all were cursed with group think.

Richard Maddalon

I don't want to be a gate keeper but this movie, hasbros involvement in the hobby, the vtt, the increased popularity of the hobby, in my opinion is ruining the hobby. My group went and saw the film. They enjoyed it. I thought it was one of tge worst movies I've ever seen. I just don't get what people 5-15 years younger than me want out of a movie or an rpg nowadays.

Glumer Games LLC

Thanks again for the honest assessment. Though I do believe Hasbro has cow towed to cultural Marxism, I also don’t think the reductionism of “go woke, go broke” from others is an apt assessment. Your points about WotC not caring about the fan base or content creators was spot on.

Drago Russo

I am always with you on everything, however, the movie outdid JW4 and worldwide has now brought in over 70 million. Rotten Tomatoes has a 93% by fans and 91% by critics which is a huge surprise. So basically it is a huge success.

Michael Penkas

I'm guessing that there was no mention of Ed Greenwood either, even though the film is set in the Forgotten Realms.

Chris Baker
>>105515936

I loved hugh grant's scenery chewing. I like that they didn't overuse him, though.

Chris Franklin

I thought the movie was bad. Plot, pacing, very disposable. I wasn’t expecting much and the few laughs I did have weren’t enough to save it. I didn’t hate the movie. It was a sub par action comedy and that’s fine. There are dozens every year. Hugh Grant surprised me but the rest were just okay.

Frederic Schmitt

I don't mind if people have fun watching this movie. But not crediting the creators of the game is arrogant and sad, to say the least.

Richard White

I think you’re being a bit harsh on this film. It’s doing well amongst critics, and it got the top spot on the box office (as an opening big budget film *should*). The film is on $70m globally, and it should go on to $300m at the box office once all is said and done. Is it a home run? No. Is it a flop? No. Is it the best D&D film ever made? Yes (low bar!). It’s an average film that will probably end up being about as remarkable/memorable as the Warcraft film.

Daniel Defazio
>>105518754

70m overall. 38 domestically and 33 in the rest of the world. Movies make 60-70% of their grosses in the first three days of release. That puts it on pace to do about $210m WW. It doesn't open in China for a couple weeks, so I'd put the grosses at $300m. The ceiling is 435m.

Cee-Jay
>>105508026

Well, it did employ the "women gotta save the idiot men" thing that's so popular these days, but yes it wasn't too agenda driven beyond that.

Cee-Jay
>>105508648

Maybe the Hickman's would get a big cut and WizBro doesn't want to pay them? Because I would have to agree, that you've got great stories plaus you've already got books and merchandise ready to go with that series.

Cee-Jay
>>105518276

Exactly, the movie is fine... relative to the low-grade stuff being made these days. It seems like most people are happy if you give them lots of shiny lights, moving quickly, with exciting music and occasional loud noises. Blech!

Cee-Jay
>>105526388

What you've written seems pretty close to what PDM said. In what way to you perceive he was too harsh?

MagicMurlo

Well, I liked the movie. I was expecting it to be so much cinematic garbage but, was pleasantly surprised. I disagree with the fill's overall impact or its low box office return. I expect to see this get a sequel and exceed 300 million worldwide within 2 weeks. But, that is my own opinion and I expect it is a minority opinion.

Jay
>>105517757

Of course, I would expect no less than you ask your subscribers opinions as they are your supporters and patrons. The more comments in the comments section stir up the algorithm to get more clicks and views especially on YouTube potentially leading to more subscribers and ultimately generating more revenue for the channel. That makes sense and why creators generally ask for opinions. Yet to one another mileage regarding opinions will vary. At the end of the day, I doubt anyone would put any stock in the opinions of others they don't know who have no established credibility. You know the old saying about opinions.

Elated Muse
>>105519079

I think you might want to know that the sorcerer is of the linage of Elminster. There was fan service to the old Dnd cartoon.

Elated Muse
>>105524411

this is par for the course. I don't see in the books of dnd any respect to the artists anymore. this was an issue I had with dnd and MTG was the lack of respect for the artists. though if it is a work for hire. . I suppose that is legal stuff.

Masterhit

I get this take - this has been my experience with lots of movies and books. While I have not seen this movie, yet, I suspect it will be what you claimed (Guardians-esque) and I'm perfectly OK with that kind of movie as something just to entertain. It's how I have felt about several books lots of people *love* like everything I've read by Sanderson and things like 'Ready Player One', lots of references to my youth, tropes, and written at a middle-school reading level. Does that make them bad or unworthy of my time, sometimes, but often I just move on and think "Well that was decent and entertained me for a few hours". That said, I am also a bit over the Marvel/Star Wars movie formula. It hasn't improved or changed or evolved. The characters are almost completely interchangeable. You have roles/archetypes and you get an actor and they play that archetype and few if any expectations are ever subverted. Thanks for the review! May all your future movie rolls be 20s!

Elated Muse

Box office is a financial thing. As for a person whom went to see the film I enjoyed it. I was skeptical and wasn't going to see it. But a friend of mine saw it with his DND buddies and said it was 'good'. I was a little shocked to hear the word 'good' come from him. But after seeing it. I agree. Respect to ProfDM (glad he has his vest of protection, though his insight might have been bias in its use). Hasbro rolled a 1 on the community. The movie had been in the works for sometime before the rolled one. Though I don't care to ever be a part of dndbeyond again as I don't trust their approach, I did enjoy the movie. The movie was fun. the CGI you mention was well done except one spot. It is a quality movie for a DND movie. It isn't LOTR but then that was expected to make a ton of money. This I think wasn't. It is DND. Prof DM you are hinting at something important. How does one approach a DND movie? DND is about your OWN characters you create and adventure. I think it is ironic that the DND team has characters sheets for the movie characters as I think the majority of people (dare I say if not all) make up their own characters at the table. Though I would state the sorcerer is of the lineage of Elminster. There are hints to DND all over the place. Hints to CR. Hints to Rust Monsters. there is quality respect to there creatures of DND. Movies today aren't suppose to spoon feed anyone. You have to do your homework. There is a lot of things behind the scenes of this movie. I found that the easter eggs I missed are all there. The characters are the beginning of a possible history of Ed Greenwoods world. It was the Forgotten Realms. Personally I never did care for the FR when I play. I make up my own world, though it is cool to see it on the screen. Was it everything? no. I think the approach was like all movies that spend millions. You have to think of your audience. Not the Gradnards or just the newbies. You have to try to respect the whole history without it being Ready Player One. I enjoyed the movie. It was a high quality B. I would enjoy a series or another movie. I felt it inspired me. I liked seeing the way they gave us hints on how we play the game. I think if you go to see a movie you spent money, why would you go in with an expectation? These days with the darkness of the world, I like to enjoy and this movie was fun and inspiring. for me I give it a 90%. the potatoes are a thing. the acting, script writting, integration of practical and digital effects are wonderful. Fact is, we as a DND community haven't had a good movie yet. Oh and to think of what other franchise started like the DND history of movies? Marvel. Which Marvel was the people whom helped us get the DND cartoon. Remember Marvel had Captain America with rubber ears for a the first movie. Now look at them. Like a DND group it takes sometime to get use to your characters and your groups way of working together, so does it when creating a new medium of digesting a favorite idea. In the end, I would cheer on another movie or series. As for Hasbro ask the OGL crap, I will never be a paying member of DNDbeyond again. But I don't mind the movie.

Elated Muse
>>105539177

I should also mention Ed Greenwood enjoyed the movie. He has a video on it. So that says something doesn't it? He is the creator of the Realms. he mentioned it falls into the 'tiny nits that I've picked' and 'to put it another way, I don't care about them'. So Ed approves. "The story was fun" I would suggest you go see Ed Greenwoods review of the movie.

Jay
>>105509303

Looking forward to John Wick 4 no matter how gauche others may find it. So far the series has been doing well and has proven to make money. I'm sure it will eventually peter out just as many other franchises have but at least its not cramming "The Message" down anyone's throat and has been fun so far.

Ian Butterworth

I just watched the movie and I liked it. I was not blown away, but I enjoyed the experience. For me, a negative was the frantic and confusing fight scenes. A positive was the simple story of the bad guys losing and the good guys winning with all the characters becoming better people at the end of the film. I'll be honest, I like simple fare like this.

Mike Butts

I am a barber by trade and my clients know I play D&D. They ask me if I am going to go and see the D&D movie. Then I ask them, are they going to see the movie? They said yes. Then I said instead of spending a bunch of money on a movie that probably is not that good and waste a couple of hours of your life. Why not come over to my place and play the game. I have a really nice set up. Who knows you might really enjoy it. Make our own movie in your heads, make new friends, drink a beer, and enjoy life.

David P Ackerman

I enjoyed the movie and I am not really a D&D player. I agree that Hasbro has abused its relationship with the community, but the filmmakers tried to make a decent film that could honor the game and I think they succeeded. It wasn't a GREAT film but it was IMHO a GOOD film, full of fun, likeable characters and rousing action. Will it make enough to warrant a sequel? I don't know. Could it have been a bit shorter? Probably. Should they have credited the designers? Yes, I think they should have, but I won't penalize the entirety of the film's production staff because of it. Despite these nitpicks, the writers/directors really do love the game, and I think it showed in the final product. YMMV.

Ernesto

I completely disagree with this video PDM, I went and saw the movie, and it is funny, is it going to win any cinema-related award? no, but that wasn't the intention in the first place. is the unacknowledgment of Gygax and Anderson a shameful move from Hasbro? yes, but that is on Hasbro and not on the movie, this is like saying that a piece of art is bad because of the morality of the artist's Patreon. This is a so-so movie but a great D&D movie: - The Party uses crazy ideas to solve problems, check - Visit cool places, check - A couple of cool magic items that the party uses in clever ways, check - The GM shows his favorite badass NPC and the party laments when he goes away, check - Decent and not too complicated villain, check - Hints for a greater villain for the next adventure, check - Moral choice for the Party and the end of the adventure, check I think that you went to the movie theater with your mind set in that the movie was going to be bad and then find reasons to justify your premade conclusion.

James C

I never intended on watching the movie and all my suspicions were correct. I didn’t want to watch Guardians in Faerun. And I know $150 million sounds like a lot but these days, movies with heavy special effects and CGI need to spend double that. It’s really expensive to make top tier movies and I somewhat understand why producers are willing to play it safe, hence Guardians of Faerun. What would have been interesting is if the movie transported real gamers to Faerun. Then the Guardian-esque feel would work; not to mention it would be a nod and wink to meta gaming for the tabletop fans. Manga and anime have been doing this for years with various success. And of course the 80s cartoon premise was just that. And not giving credit to Gygax and Arneson is absolutely disgusting and insulting. Hasbro should be ashamed of themselves but we know they aren’t.

MrGunn
>>105538532

@Will Morgan Agree with you somewhat about entertainment value, definitely agree on the Star Wars / Marvel formula, which is why I partially agree. Once in awhile McDonalds is ok, but fast food all the is gross and frankly not very good. Too much of today‘a movie fare is fast foodesque.

Chris Baker
>>105508026

I think you would only think that because movies have taught us to distrust the makers' intentions these days. The guys are just as competent or more as Jack Burton in BTiLC and everyone loves that movie (as they should).

Branden

Saw the movie over the weekend. It was a fun ride that I enjoyed quite a bit. The thing I really enjoyed though was 90% of what PDM didn’t. The absurdity of the world, its economy, magic, its character’s thin, cliched backstories: that’s what I love about D&D! Every eye-rolling moment had me laughing and saying “that’s 100% what would happen at my table.” Everyone’s taste and experience with the game are going to be different, but for me the movie nailed my experience of playing D&D (I’ve been playing since 2e for whatever that’s worth). In other words I saw the movie as an experience of the game itself (at a meta-level) and not as a story being told within a particular Faerun-Ian setting. Does this make sense?

baldrage
>>105518754

Interesting thought experiment... What if WOTC hadn't pulled the OGL shenanigans? What if the directors hadn't run off at the mouth and said they intentionally set out to emasculate the male characters? What if Kyle Brink hadn't said that adukt white men couldn't leave the hobby fast enough? Would the movie have made over $100 million this weekend? You know what, now that I think about it, the fact this movie pulled in $40 million with Hasbro/WOTC pulling out all the stops to alienate a large portion of their core fan base means it is probably OVER performing!

7DSystem

What most people don't understand is that for a movie that costs $100m, the "break even" point is close to $400m. The budget of the film does not include the cost of marketing, distribution, licensing, brokering, regionalising, advertising and the share given to the theatres. This is what Hollywood only makes low budget and high budget movies now. They don't make "middle" budget movies. Movies that cost $40 to $60 million, like romcoms. They have to make $160 to $240 million to be profitable and that is a bigger gamble than spending $150 million to $400 million. Low budget films that cost less than $10m only have to recoup $40 million or less to be profitable. So if they make a profit of $600 million on a $1billion dollar winner, they can produce 2 high budget films and 40 low budget films. If they get 4 hits out of the 40 low budget films, they can make another few hundred million profit. If they were to make 10 middle movies for that money and only 1 is a hit.. they won't make as much profit. This also leads to a glut of small indie film makers that are suddenly thrust into $100 to $300 million dollar movies. It used to be that you would start on a low budget film and graduate to the next level (middle movies). Now, there is no middle. So a moderately successful filmmaker goes from $10m to $200 million in one leap. As Kevin Smith has famously said, "Please don't give me more than $10m to make a movie". The reason for this is that he knows how to stay in his lane. You tank a $300million movie and you will never make another movie again. The huge problem we are seeing now is that the people who actually know how to make a GOOD moviea are aging out of the business. The people coming into the industry do not have the experience or the skill to actually make a "good" movie. By good, I mean a film that is artistically satisfying, entertaining and makes money. There are very few good scripts, there are very few good film makers and those who are good have actually realised that they can make more money on YouTube creating content or creating things for Netflix et al. They know how to stay in their lane and not to be tempted by Hollywood silly money.

Brian Leet

I enjoyed the movie thoroughly. My whole group got dressed up and went to a screening arranged by a friend who hosts four middle school after school D&D clubs per week. The theater was full, mostly kids aged 10-15 and parents/adults. It was zany, silly and cliched. All the things my regular games are as well. I thought they included clever twists and fun moments and that’s all I wanted. It’s the best mass media D&D branded enterprise in my 42 years of playing - and that’s enough for me.

Kevin Kelleher

Grognard alert! Giving thumbs down to a movie that the worst thing anybody can say about it is that it's still a good movie.

Daniel Defazio
>>105586784

Other pro critics agree with me. I maintain history will vindicate me in the end. Still planning to come to Manhattan this summer and run something for my Patrons there.

Daniel Defazio
>>105551459

There's always a danger of that. As I said in the review, I REALLY enjoyed the mouse in armor scene. If the rest of the movie had been THAT good, it would have gotten a thumbs up. Ask yourself this: did we really need the battle with the stone dragon THEN the red wizard? I think not. It would have been a better fight and cost less $.

Steven Fader

Great Video! Wow you are getting a lot of hate for stating an opinion. I think you need to invest some coin in a new +3 vest of protection hahaha.

jnlsn family

Interesting trick you taught us about the "we're writing a sequel right now!" Now let me teach you one: The Shill Bot. Go into your comments section and see how it's flooded with comments from profiles that are freshly created, have 0 videos, 0 subs. They all say the same thing. "The movie was great! I loved it!"

Jay
>>105583075

Outstanding analysis Gareth. Also enjoy the work on Quest Givers with Scotty. You guys made some great products for sure.

Bobby Uhoh

You called it! "Sequel with drizzt coming" lol appreciate you dude. Good stuff all the time. Let the haters hate. You said you wanted to blow up the channel right? Lmao ✌️