Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Hey everyone - 

I have a legitimate question that I want your most honest answer for.   Ian and I have been talking and while InRange as a separate channel is growing and getting more clout, the reality is that Forgotten Weapons (as a channel) is already huge and growing more so every day.

We are assuming, although not sure, that the demographic of the audiences between the two channels has substantial crossover.   We also believe we're doing (mostly) excellent and superb work with InRange that is unqiue and different to the firearms community.   We're proud of what we're doing with InRange and want more people to see it.   We believe that InRange promotes a positive message regarding the knowledgeable and skilled use of firearms; it's not just entertainment that treats guns like toys but it is still quite different than the pure Forgotten Weapons' content: Old West Vignettes, modern guns, training, competition, etc.

Here's the deal - Forgotten Weapon's income, be it ad revenue or Patreon, wholly supports Forgotten Weapons.   InRange's Patreon income wholly supports only InRange efforts - they are DIFFERENT endeavors "on the books" and *must* remain that way.     

What would you all think if the InRange content stayed what it is, the same stuff we're doing now that you hopefully like (being a patron), but the difference being that it's published on the Forgotten Weapon's channel instead of a separate YouTube InRange channel? 

The immediate and automatic benefit would be that we'd immediately reach a broader audience with the InRange efforts and there's potential for cross-over education between people who watch only one or the other.    People who don't want to watch InRange content that pops up in the Forgotten Weapons feed would merely...not click on them, and vice versa.

The Patreon efforts would have to stay separate, and we'd keep the same Patreon benefits we have now for InRange - monthly give aways, etc.   It is critical that the Patreon support that you, yes you, have generously been a contributor towards does not dissolve if we were to do this.   

In summary, the proposal is:

Publish InRange content under the Forgotten Weapons' Youtube channel to broaden the reach.

Not lose the existing, and hopefully even continue to grow, the InRangeTV specific Patreon support.

Please note this is just a brainstorming idea and I'm going to you, our core, to hear what you think.  

Thank you for your support, your time and your valuable input,

Karl

Comments

John Goldman

Sounds good to me! Keep up the good work 😀

Rupanrx

Sure. Thank you Karl!

John

Works for me.

Fran Love

My opinion is: Forgotten Weapons should stay true to its name: a channel about forgotten, old or just weird firearms and related technologies. Most InRange stuff (2guns or modern optics reviews) simply won't find under the moniker.

Deviant Ollam

i'm a fan of cross-posting and the like, but there's one critical issue at hand here... unlike many video creators on Patreon who publish on YouTube, that platform's anti-gun stance has meant that much of your content appears on Full30. And, let's be fair, Full30 is a fucking shitshow of a web site. It's hard enough to find the original content that folk come there to see, let alone putting the burden on the subscribers to "sort out" which items they do and don't want to see. Alternate plan (but sadly, it's more work for you slightly)... For every new InRange video and for every new Forgotten Weapons video, during filming you folk record a 15 second bumper or teaser clip. Cross post THOSE to the other channels... i bet that much of your audience would subscribe to both channels and be Patreon supporters of both channels. Use the built-in viewer base to cross-pollinate without cluttering up the already difficult Full30 feeds.

BrandoSpoke

i really wouldnt mind that at all

NATHAN WRAY

Yeah I think that would be great if you guys feel that's best

Grant Howard

I would prefer it to stay a separate channel. But, I do think it would be cool to have some occasional parts of InRange's content featured on Forgotten Weapons to broaden the reach of InRange's videos.

Marc Paris

I'm a patron of both sites and will continue to be so it won't matter to me. My biggest concern on publishing InRange on Forgotten Weapons is that it might muddle the future Patrons ... people would become FW patrons when they thought they would be becoming InRange patrons. I guess some cross publicity between FW and IR might also help (similar to what you've done with TGW - which I'm also a patron of)

Jake

Given the nature of YouTube, I think this is probably a good idea. While most InRange viewers probably discovered it via FW, not all FW viewers might be aware. Would you still be maintaining both channels on YT & Full30? The only concern I'd have would be new would-be patrons not being sure what to sponsor, though that could be clarified in the description, both on YT & patreon.

JG

I think the content is different enough that having the channels separate makes more sense. That said, some cross promotion may help. I watched Forgotten Weapons every day for a long time before I had even heard of InRange.

Alex R.

I actually forgot they're even separate. Do it!

james Kachman

I think having the channels separate is necessary for the majority of videos. Maybe have a small portion of content be cross-posted, or having intermingled content be branded as a cooperation betwixt the two channels. I also follow Full30 religiously to see every new video the moment its released. Seeing duplicated videos would be kind of obnoxious.

William Kennison

Combining the content would do well with me as my schedule allows me to catch one but seldom both videos in a sitting.

Jared Dietz

Two very different channels with content that, though overlaps viewers, I'm pretty sure should remain separate. I see the want to branch out InRange, but you have to think that Forgotten Weapons has been around for a LOT longer. The more content you guys make for InRange, the more people will get exposure to it. Just my thoughts. Love the work!

Patrick Wipf

I would not have a problem with it but the two are different enough that it makes sense for them to be there own channels.

Marc Paris

Hi Deviant - been reading your Practical Lockpicking book. It got my 12 year old and I into lockpicking. I was so proud when he picked a lock in front of his grandparents at Christmas and dropped it on the table like a mic. Thanks for publishing it.

michael bujnarowski

i think it would be best to leave the channels separate.

Jonah Baroncinni

While I love both channels and their content, they are 2 very different concepts. FW is a more informational page, with lots of full breakdowns, explaining, and history. Inrange is about 2 gun matches and reviews. I go to each channel for different reasons. I feel like homogenizing them would detract from both of their strengths. But thats my opinion, and as long as you guys put the quality in both channels, I will happily continue to watch!

Mitsuko

I would rather have it separated. I can count on InRange being "tactical-esque". I can see the mash up of older weapons or tech being run in a modern environment via 2G-ACM as well as the shot show/shooter interviews. This doesn't blend well into the Forgotten Weapons channel, which I genuinely think should focus entirely on the premise of firearms that most of us have never seen before. In my opinion, it doesn't blend well. If you really want exposure then do the occasional cross-post video (like your Fanta video could have gone to Forgotten Weapons) Keep it separate. Viewers will come in time.

Deviant Ollam

hah, thanks, man! :-) so cool to hear that. happy picking!

Patrick Allen

I say do it and get the InRange stuff out on Forgotten Weapons. I support both and would not mind the channel consolidation in order to get more viewers and angry comments from nutjobs.

Sean

Absolutely. Anything that gets you guys more exposure is for the best. You guys create bar none the best gun related content on the internet, and I definitely wouldn't mind seeing Inrange content on the Forgotten Weapons channel. Looking forward to future of both projects, and I'll likely be purchasing a shirt soon (more merch please!) Best, Sean

Christopher Ford

I like them separate personally, because I think they're different concepts and I like the purity of concept of FW being a repository for all this info (for example, when Ian gets his hand on a bunch of Bergmanns, we get a shitload of Bergmann videos, even if youtube logic would say not to have that many in a row). I think you should feel free to have more crossovers or shoutouts to InRange on FW though, as a lot of casual viewers might not know about it, and not everyone watches every video.

Jake

If you decide against hosting all IR vids on FW, one possible compromise would simply be to include a link to IR in FW vids themselves (not at the bottom of the description). Another would be to post "teaser" videos that link over to IR from time to time, and full videos that are more FW related, such as the Old West Vignettes.

Tommy Herbs

Personally do what ever will help the channel grow & bring more content. I've been watching FW since before ep1 of IRTV. I give money to both because I enjoy both, reading through the other Patrons comments I can see how seeing the contents of one on the other could be confusing to new/existing viewers. Will this change potential effect the content Full30.com, or just YouTube?

Kyle Iverson

I feel that publishing InRange content under ForgottenWeapons would indeed reach a broader spectrum of viewers, but at the cost of InRange coming off as a sideshow to the "real" channel. Depends on what's most important to you two: spreading the content and hopefully spreading that knowledge further, or keeping the fundamental independence of InRange...I like InRange enough to where I consider it an entirely separate entity from ForgottenWeapons, and keeping them separate would prevent Karl from being possibly seen as only an occasional component rather than the necessary half that he is. Either way, keep up the awesome work.

Timothy S Hennessey

After thinking about it for awhile I feel the best path might be to combine content would be when there is a clear synergy between what Ian is exploring on Forgotten Weapons and a episode of InRange that explores that weapon or a close analog. In either case I will continue to support both channels and your decision.

jordan coulson

I support both, but am not too sure there is a lot of cross over...that being said, whatever the best is for the channels, do it! Thanks for all you do, and keep up the great work!

RCK

I am for what ever moves your projects forward. I love them both!

Justin M.

sounds like a good idea.

Andrew Marchetta

I think established "fans" would accept a blended format. However I agree with others who have voiced concern over blended content. New viewers might not understand the overall concept. In summary, I won't dump you guys, but not aure new viewers will catch on. Best to you

Daniel warden

I would prefer to keep it separate, I think a "cross over" video/videos would be a good idea though like running a "forgotten weapon" in a match or a vignettes on a specific forgotten weapon. I think the two channels would water each other down potentially. But I'm with you guys ether way. Love the work you do.

Willard Cushman

I enjoy both channels but find myself watching just about every In Range video and only occasionally viewing a Forgotten Weapons presentation.

Aaron Sharp

This seems like a question that you should pose to someone in a branding/marketing background. I'm just here for the guns! That said I will echo what most are saying-that I'll continue to support both channels whichever way you decide to go. Keep up the good work!

Andrew Yates

I am subscribed, and am a happy patron of both channels. I am happy to continue supporting both. Where the content is published doesn't concern me a whole lot. I go between Full30 and YouTube, and feel that publishing InRange content on the Forgotten Weapons channel can only increase the exposure for the InRange channel. One alternative would be to sprinkle content once in a while to draw subscribers to the InRange channel. It would encourage support to InRange and maybe get the subscriber base up, which leads YouTube to increase your exposure in related content (presumably). Although I readily accept that there's a peculiar barrier to entry when asking people to navigate to another channel and click subscribe.

Lsdtv

The content is very different between the two. But The Gun Guys that I know on YouTube would definitely enjoy both and probably do subscribe to both channels. For those who don't subscribe to both I'd be willing to bet they would thoroughly enjoy content on in range. Just maybe some kind of different thumbnail border or something to distinguish the two. Either way love the work on both channels keep it up guys

Molonious Prime

From a viewer perspective I have no issues with that. The big questions really to me would be all the background on your guys' end. Will that potentially limit the types of things that the new combined channel can do? (E.g. are there subjects or conversations that may feature on one channel that you wouldnt want connected to the other?) Is Ian comfortable mixing and juggling his two brands together like that? Is Karl willing to tie the venture to Ian's other endeavors? Would this potentially relegate InRange to being seen as just a "sideshow" to Forgotten Weapons instead of a distinct project? (and limit some viewers' understanding that they are different projects with different revenue sources and support options?) These are the kinds of things I would think long and hard about, particularly if the income from these projects is (or is planned to be) the primary source of personal income for either or both of you guys. If you guys are all in after answering those questions for yourselves, then as a subscriber I'm not particularly bothered by a channel merger, by all means go for it.

rook

I don't mind, but some might. I think it'd be fine if you did a crossover series on the other channel. It'd be a middle ground that most would enjoy while also accomplishing your goal of bringing In Range to a larger audience.

Sean

Perhaps this could be solved by creating an umbrella channel on which Forgotten Weapons and InRange are both separate series? They could be distinct by title and playlists. Of course this might require renaming or rebranding the Forgotten Weapons channel to this unspecified umbrella channel name, which could cause confusion, but it would allow both "shows" to remain distinct but reach a consolidated larger audience. It also allows for future show concepts that'll might fall outside the scope of both InRange and Forgotten Weapons. For instance, propaganda/news? cyber security? Misc history stuff? (The Fanta video comes to mind) All topics on current InRange videos that perhaps don't mesh well with the stated theme of the channel, but are awesome one offs that could warrent future content.

Andrew Yates

Looking at other comments. The branding comment is a sharp observation. A specially made thumbnail would be good when publishing IR on FW. That way long time subscribers to FW, that don't know IR, would see the IR episode maybe as a special episode hosted on the FW channel. I'm sure there's a more elegant way to say that, but food for thought to minimize any confusion

Chris Camp

I think it would work best as cross posting only certain videos that make sense for both channels. For example, the current match content with the historical ARs, sure, but not the content from SHOT show. IMHO, the channels should stay separate, but cross post when it makes sense to.

Edward Hertig

I like both channels so much and watch both, if combining both means that the content of each channel remains the same under one roof, making things easier for both of you and being able to pool resources then I am all for it. I really do look forward everyday to checking Full30 to see what InRange and Forgotten Weapons has put out. Whatever it takes to keep both formats going I will support.

ShallNotBeInfringed

Do it. Keep video structure the same ... same preview window identifying it as Forgottenweapons or InRange, then at the end do the unique Patreon support request. (This is what you proposed). It could really help growth and expand things. Also - maybe in additon to posting InRange content on ForgottenWeapons, you should post ForgottenWeapons content on InRange (maximize both audiences!).... their might be some guys that like mud tests, but don't like knowing about the history of spanish pistols (wierdos). I would recommend you post ALL content on BOTH channels.

Aw Fisk

Wouldn't effect me much - I watch both (and give to both) - so it you want to lump 'em - do it.

Kyle Freidel

I too share the concerns about InRange then seeming like a sideshow to FW. I guess it's tough since both are already well established. And viewership is such a fickle beast these days that it's scary to rock the boat. But that said, if you guys think it will get many thousands more viewers, some of those new people will likely give financial support just as we do. I like them separate, but we trust you guys to drive the bus here.

David Michael L Knobel

I support both channels, Love them both, I have no problem with your proposal :)

David Morris

Having seen the type of thing people complain about, and unsubscribe for, I think separate channels, but perhaps with some crossover efforts would be the better idea. There is not much InRange promotion on Forgotten Weapons. That could increase with contextual cross promotions while still keeping what is really different content separate, thus keeping those that only like one or the other happy.

Kameron Rougeou

I love both channels and i am a STUPID fan for both of em so my suggestion is this if you are going to "mash" forgotten weapons and inrangetv do it in a way that still keeps the old format for instance 1 channel but 2 separate formats Lookup THE ESCAPIST on youtube still the same guy but he has 2 formats game reviews and joke reviews. As in if ya wanted to call it a different name persay but keep forgotten weapons in 1 link and inrange in another but under the same name.

Taylor Martin

I would worry from a view standpoint myself in the sense that a lot of content uploaded in a short period from two sources may cause some viewers to miss a video. I do like the idea though. Go for it!

Felipe Revilla

Everyone else is already saying what I'm thinking. If it simplifies things for you guys, I'm all for it. I love both channels.

Corey Allhands

I'm going to agree with a few others here. I have no problem with IR content being put up on the FW channel. I subscribe to both and love both. However, I think it would work better as a context based thing. Cross post IR videos that have something to do with FW content, an extra if you will.

Ed knetzer

What is the benefit for you to combine the channels? It wouldn't change my viewing habits if you brought them together but I feel the channels content is at odds with each other.

Robert Drewry

I look at Forgotten Weapons as an encyclopedia of guns and forgotten gun accessories. Ian's presentations are academic and wholly inoffensive to all levels of the pro/anti gun spectrum. That being said. I would like to see crossovers. Perhaps an on going series where you take guns that are interesting historically or design wise and go in deep. Taking them to a match, run them against contemporaries. Delve deeper into the history and how that particular gun played a role in US/World history. Use live fire to demonstrate concepts. Replicate period correct handling and kit. Call this "InRange on Forgotten Weapons" or similar. Entice viewers to go to the main channel with behind the scenes, outtakes, breakdowns, etc. 'Old West Vignettes' would be a great series to dual post or recreate on Forgotten Weapons. I think it would fit very comfortably within the academic setting Ian has crafted. Do more of them Karl! Rename it so you can do them outside the time/location constraints of the old West. Everytime you travel do as many as the area you're in will allow. Name it "InRange on Forgotten Weapons: Gunfights" or something simpler. I know it's not super successful on InRange but I think it might do better as a regular program on Forgotten Weapons. Make videos on InRange with the weapons used and significant shots that took place and direct people to them. Perhaps a build series. Something like "InRange on Forgotten Weapons: Builds!" Then spend the video/series building/assembling a historically accurate firearm from a kit or pieces assembled. Start with a M16A1 clone or similar for simplicity and testing purposes. I know Karl can go into detail over parts choice and alternatives and he should. IMO it boils down to brand recognition and regularity. If you put out series that are branded InRange, that aren't fully immersive unless you go to InRange, you'll get people to go there. Once they're there you've got them and (hopefully) most will stay for InRange exclusives. In summation: Keep wholly modern gear reviews to InRange, brand more academic content "InRange" and post to Forgotten Weapons. I'm confident "InRange on Forgotten Weapons" can do well without combining the channels. Ultimately you guys have the numbers and must decide for yourselves. I apologise for incoherence and I thank you for your time.

Frank Moonyoung Lee

Hmm, I'm a little confused. Firstly, isn't there a way for you guys to import the patron list for each channel and then see how much crossover there actually is to assess the potential benefits? Also, is there something preventing you from continuing posting videos on the InRange channel, and in addition to that posting InRange videos on Forgotten Weapons at the same time? Either way, I support both channels and watch videos from both, so I don't think I have any reason to object to the changes.

VicNighthorse

I posit that they are very different channels and are best kept separate. I support them both but don't much like getting chocolate in my peanut butter and vice versa. I like Forgotten Weapons a more because I like mellow and am not as much a shooter as I am a history and technical buff.

Jinwoo Kang

I think most of us here who are patrons won't mind any medium as long as we get to access you the content you guys make. It's hard to predict what way other viewers who might not be as deeply interested in one or the other Channel or both will take to a sudden merge of content. While both channels talk about the same subject, I think they have a very different doctrines if you will of presenting information and type of content. If you do merge your channels(with forgotten weapons channel) what are you going to do with the current in range channel. And whats gonna happen to the planned the keltec giveaway? But whatever you and Ian decide on I think most of us here on patreon will support you one hundred percent. P.S. The replica Dudley dagger arrived safely and it's having unexpected effect of making me losing all my money to more replicas/surplus gear. Thanks alot.

Zachary S. Clarkson

It doesn't sound like a bad idea if you're trying to increase the audience of the channel by using Forgotten Weapons' established fan base. Though it seems to be on a path toward a merger of the two channels which wouldn't be bad, but I believe the two are best kept separate.

London Jolly

I wouldn't mind, I keep up daily with both channels anyways. As with others, my only question is with the RDB giveaway. What will be the new milestone? You would think people from FW would flock to InRange, oh well.

Matisse Enzer

I'll continue to support both whichever way you go. I do think you'd benefit from a month or two of testing it out.

mandaloin

If you merge the channels but keep the patreons separate, you'll probably find the InRange revenue dry up. A new viewer would find the concept of 1 channel but 2 revenues confusing. If you were to consolidate the channels and patreons I'd say go for it, but otherwise I'm not sure it's such a good move.

Dr Jonas Schwenck

Hi Karl, Hi Ian, I personally am happy either way. I found the InRange channel via Forgotten Weapons so I guess it makes sense to wholly merge the two. Maybe a trial run would not be a bad idea, but then that sounds like a lot of added admin etc. I'll definitely continue my support on here either way. Think you guys are doing great work.

Leonard Heinz

I subscribe to and support both channels, and see them as different in emphasis but complementary. Before InRange was InRange, I particularly liked the Forgotten Weapons episodes that field tested historical equipment in the two gun matches. So I see a definite connection and think that linking InRange to Forgotten Weapons is a good idea. And if that link encourages more vintage weapons on InRange, so much the better.

Joseph Comey

I think it would be a positive move, actually. My only advice would be to make a channel trailer explaining the change and what the two shows cover. Keep up the good work!

Mike Wehrer

I would prefer to keep the channels separate. I watch more or less every video you put out, on both channels. But when i'm looking for something to watch from the older videos, being able to browse each channel independently is important to me because the content is so distinct. I would totally support title cards/intros/outros on the videos directing the viewers to check out the other channel.

Todd Gottfried

I don't think the channels should completely merge. But I have no problem with IR content seeping in when it's relatable to the FW format.

Rick Hale

I would rather you kept them separate.

Candice C Voets

I agree with a few others that this may have a negative effect on getting new Patreon supporters. That being said I will continue to support both as much as I can (Sorry, me being on a fixed income means you each get a dollar, don't spend it all in one place ya hear).

Mike Murphy

I prefer that you keep the channels seperate. I understand your desire to broaden the InRange viewership but InRnage

Mike Murphy

I prefer that you keep the channels seperate. I understand your desire to broaden the InRange viewership but InRnage

Mike Murphy

I prefer that you keep the channels seperate. I understand your desire to broaden the InRange viewership but InRnage

Jacob Harrod

First, I'm a big fan of what you fellas do on both channels and being pretty tight with my money your channel is the only one I support monetarily. I fully support you to combine the channels, though I suggest giving a good amount of time with many announcements before you do. Then let us know when to switch over our support to the permanent channel.

Joe Venzon

Instead of making the decision to fully move inrange content to the forgotten weapons channel, what about having occasional "guest" inrange content that shows up on the forgotten weapons channel, and is made with that in mind (i.e. has a lot of "hey if you like what you see here, check out the inrange channel for more."

Mike Hubler

Im a supporter of both channels so it would save me the trouble of changing channels. I'd say go for it it's only going to help in the subscriptions. Keep up with the great work.

Gerald King

If the content from both channels is still available it would not matter to me if they were combined. At the present time I am only supporting In Range on Patreon. I do plan to extend my support and Forgotten Weapons is one of the channels I'm planning to add to my list. Both channels are excellent. Which ever way you decided to go best of luck and keep those great videos coming.

Frank E McGillivray

I think it's a good idea, there is so much cross promotion anyway. PS just want to say that Forgotten Weapons and InRange are so totally unique that I can see why patrons fear a change. Change is not always good but you Karl and Ian are the core of what makes both sites so exceptional. Your humour, knowledge and almost whimsical no fucks attitude are very attractive and different from anything else I have seen (Ian's poetry reading last week was so fun). So, as long as you both are running the show I welcome the change.

chris rookstool

Both channels are great, both of you are great. I say keep 'em separate, if an issue comes up with one channel it won't as directly affect the other. Come up with "marketing" to cross promote or something to that affect. I've seen decent size car dealerships consolidate under one roof, on one lot and now its going back, to single or just double marquis. A screw up with one lot doesn't transfer to the others as easily.

Jacob Forsythe

If karl and Ian think that this is a viable option (which the fact that they are open about the idea leads me to think so) i think it would be a great way to build cross-interest. Especially now with things like battlefield 1 that will boost interest in forgotten weapons content, it would expose a lot of people to inrange's attitude of modern firearms in a way that they may not have been open to before. Conversely, a lot of modern gun nuts who geek out about new developements will maybe look at forgotten weapons and gain new perspective on historical firearms and modern trends. But ultimately it is Karl and Ian's decision. They are the ones who built these channels and create content. Im just happy to have a small part in it. Sorry for the tldr

Terry Buchholz

I support both channels so for me it's do whatever will allow InRange to make longer videos again please. I miss the old complete 2gACM videos and I shudder to think of Ian taking a look at 1 gun and making it into a 4 part series.

Anthony Hope

I love both channels, I have no problem with the content being shared among both channels.

Atle Reigstad

Do what you have to do to you,crazy kids

Paul Crew

If it can benefit both channels, then I see no reason not to. I watch and support both. I also support C&Rsenal for the same reason: Informative content that makes me think and appreciate the past , present and future of firearms.

Justin Walker

Big problem is that a fair portion of the Forgotten Weapons userbase is seemingly against sporting or recreational use of firearms, even in the format you present with InRange. It's better to just keep the two separate, but get more information out there about InRange.

Tyler Miller

I enjoy both channels, and will continue to support both whatever you decide. Like many others, I do think that a lot of InRangeTV content might not appeal to the Forgotten Weapons audience. It might be better to try to promote InRange on Forgotten Weapons in areas where they overlap. I bet most of the of Forgotten Weapons audience would enjoy a cross-posted Old West Vignette, or maybe a 2GACM run with older firearms, but if all of the sudden half of the videos showing up on the channel were mud tests of ARs and talks on the importance of cryptography that might annoy a lot of them.

Bill Field

I'd be happy with the new setup but I would caution against anything that would mean people would have to resetup their accounts in any way. I've worked with people using online subscriptions in the past and that kind of thing inevitably means many people never getting around to jumping through the mild hoop of registering somewhere else or even the same place that essential one time again.

pcman312

My main question is: what are you trying to accomplish by merging the channels? Is your goal to try to expand your audience? Are you trying to streamline video uploads? For me personally, I already subscribe to and am a patreon of both channels, so it won't really affect me. Unfortunately that also means I am not really the part of your audience you seem to be trying to reach.

Eugene Luder

As long as FW doesn't change content and format, I'm OK. OTOH, I also don't want to see IR narrow down to only historical firearms and equipment. I enjoy the contrarian myth busting stories like Fire Clean egg cooking. It is all gun content, I support both channels, but I also don't want the content to change or coalesce.

Robert Jon Mudry

I prefer them to remain separate. I've had several channels I used to watch merge with channels I wasn't interested in. After long spells without the content I used to enjoy, I ultimately ended up leaving. I likely wouldn't do that in this case, because I love both channels, but other might. I found out about InRange when Ian mentioned it on Forgotten Weapons. How about a brief bumper advertising each channel on the other?

Chris Krueger

I would be okay with a merger as long as the content is the same and the pace of videos remains the same. Actually, I can't get enough of either! Been a subscriber and watching InRange since day 1 and subbed to Forgotten Weapons since the old intro of the Madsen was still in use! Both channels are stellar and don't want to see even a millimeter given up if a merger takes place. Thanks for being awesome! Keep it up!

Lars Telg

I think it would be good to combine the two content streams. Builds a better ad revenue for one small channel instead of two very small channels. I grew up studying guns through museums, books and different written media. FW have totally changed my access to in depth knowledge about technical and developmental aspects och guns. InRange is a fantastic window into practical application of weapons. Combine and conquer is my advice. The content is alredy combined in my feed!

Zach

Personally I think separation is a good idea. Although the demographic is the same the difference in content would, I feel, skew the "Forgotten Weapons" vibe. That said, I'm all for cross-promotion. Advertising InRange in FW videos, or putting FW themed InRange videos on the FW channel every now and then might not be too bad. Particularly the vignettes!

John Whitacre

I prefer to keep the channels separate.

Andrew Donoghue

I believe that a trial would most certainly not be unwarranted, there are risks to doing it, and before going forward with it you need to get the opinion of the YouTube community at large, not just us patreons. I think it could be a phenomenal way to expand the InRange viewership base, and I have absolutely no problem with the idea, it just could turn some viewers off. Interesting propersition, and, if you go forward with it, I hope it bring you the ability to produce more, and more diverse, content.

Robert Ralls

I for one would not see the problem with merging the channels. All of the topics and material that is covered on both channel interest me, and thus I watch both. You guys have great content, and always seem to be showing something I like. Keep up the great work!

Ichiko Kahkol

I think i'm with the majority here, as cross promotion always good. feeding both into one might not have such a positive outcome as you're hoping for. After doing a fair bit of cross promo on FW and then possibly putting up a InRange piece and seeing how it fairs will give you a much better marker of merger interest. Or at least that what I could consider a reasonable approach to the situation. and always love your efforts :)

Niels Bastholm Knudsen

As a follower/supporter of both channels I haven't got a problem with merging content.

SeraphJ4GUAR

I think it would be beneficial to do some "exclusive" cross promotional content on Forgotten Weapons to grow In-Range Perhaps if you guys do another theme shoot have a video where you do a more in-depth review on FW, talking about its history, devlopment, evolution, etc in a more presentation focused setup, and then use that to bait people over to in range to watch the run and gun and post stage discussion about the pros and cons of the setup.

SeraphJ4GUAR

I think it would be beneficial to do some "exclusive" cross promotional content on Forgotten Weapons to grow In-Range Perhaps if you guys do another theme shoot have a video where you do a more in-depth review on FW, talking about its history, development, evolution, etc in a more presentation focused setup, and then use that to bait people over to in range to watch the run and gun and post stage discussion about the pros and cons of the setup. Items like that OEG sight that Ian used a bit ago would be a good example. Talk a bit more in depth about its history and collimator sights in general, get Karl to talk about its evolution into more modern 1x optics we see today, how it might have been setup/tactics then vs how we might employ it now, etc. before driving traffic over to In range where you will already have a P1 video up for the shoot.

Shaun Christensen

I support both and I prefer two separate channels. Separation of church and state

Jay Richner

As I suspect many patreons here, I support both channels - indicating that the separation may not reflect the audience's reality. And I would maintain my net contribution in the event of a merger. That said, I do see the two channels as having a different offering: ForgottenWeapons appeals to the collector in me - it is more theoretical, nerdy if you will. InRange is more about the practical application. So, there is something to be said in favour of the seperation.

Mitchell Lloyd

I quite enjoy both channels, I also patreon support both of them. I tend to watch each channel separately. I prefer it this way, so I can watch similar videos back to back.

Frederick Morrison

I already support both channels so it would be fine with me if you merged the content.

Michael Coia

If it was easy to notice which part of the merged channel each specific video was a part of I would not mind. They are both great channels and I watch every video on Full30

Ben Nicolson

I sponsor both and would not mind the proposed merging as described. I think it would be great for more people to be aware of InRange

Philip

It wouldnt make any difference to me. i subscribe to both channels and dont really care wich one a video goes up on.

john r gouley

As long as you don't take either away I don't care. I sponsor both and will continue to do so.

Ernie Anderson

I think that's a good idea. Anything to get more eyes on you guys, because I really think u guys got something here. I support both channels and will continue to.

ZeroSuitSamo

The merge of channels wouldn't bother me at all, I'm sub'd to both. However: I do see a potential problem. If a new watcher decides they want to become a patron I could see some wanting to support In Range but donating to Forgotten Weapons since that is the name of the channel. But if you make it clear that there are two, and provide links to the proper one it shouldn't be that big of a problem.

William meadows

As a supporter of both channels,I think it would be better to keep them separate,and do a lot of crossovers.they are distinctive and should stay that way .

MarvinCZ

I support and follow both so I wouldn't mind and I would continue my support. However, I feel that this should be also asked with the Forgotten Weapons crowd, as there might be some who would mind.

Daan van Nunen

I watch and enjoy both channels. Nonetheless, I do prefer a separation between them given their different characters. Forgotten weapons has a rather serious, studious presentation of historic firearms and paraphernalia. On the other hand, inRange has a more diverse focus, ranging from the edibility of lubricants to assembling parts kits. Moreover, inRange has a looser and far more opinionated way of presentation, allowing both your personalities to shine through. The channel inRange is not merely concerned with firearms, but also with the personalities Karl and Ian; a bit like the British series TopGear was not solely about cars.

Joey

I enjoy both, subscribe to both and donate to both. I'd be fine either way, but would think it would be better to keep them separate. It might not occur to some new viewers who contribute to one that they would even need to contribute the other, as it could seem to all be coming from one source to them.

Jon Payne

I think the situation is that virtually everyone who knows about InRange is also aware of Forgotten Weapons, but not necessarily the other way around. It objectively wouldn't make that much of a difference to me if all IR videos were on FW as I watch all of them anyway. However, I think each channel has a separate enough identity to warrant a general separation between the two. I think the solution is a semi-regular crossover video on the FW channel. Perhaps these episodes could involve taking a forgotten weapon to a 2-gun match. I know that this would be very difficult to pull off on a semi-regular basis as Ian would basically have to buy the gun with his or FW money. Another less expensive crossover video theme might be where forgotten or anachronistic tactics or uses for historical weapons are demonstrated on a range or at a 2-gun match. I know it would be difficult to do this every other week or month but there have been several IR videos that I think could have easily been FW videos as well.

Tom Asher

Makes sense to me. If you post something I am not interested in. I just don't watch it. Shouldn't be a big deal to anyone, I would think.

Chris Trott

Hey guys. I'm a fairly new backer to both channels, and I think keeping them separate is probably the best way to go. I agree with several others here that maybe more cross-promotion/crossover videos would be cool, but I don't really see merging the two channels as being fully advantageous.

joshua buntrock

Works for me. I really enjoy y'alls' work, and think that however you arrange it, it is unique and informative. Thanks!

Sagen Gearhart

I would continue support either way, but I think youtube recommends inRange videos consistently enough from forgotten weapons views that I'm not sure if people would necessarily be missing them. Thats how I found inRange anyway. I like the separation of themes, but if merging them made it possible to do more overall content I'd be cool with it.

Robert McCorkle

Howdy! The two channels are in my top five favorite for content, and I am a patron of both. I really enjoy the historical aspects of the two channels immensely, as well as how you represent the responsible enjoyment of firearms ownership. I also very much appreciate that y'all are not doing a sales push for the latest and greatest piece of combat tupperware. That said, I do not think that you need combine the channels to increase viewership. The idea that if people did not wish to view a topic on the combined channel, the could just not click on it, is valid. On the other hand, you do want your subscribers clicking on each installment, correct? If I were in your shoes, I would continue to invite viewership of each others channel, in the closing comments of the installments. Folks will follow the lead and become regular viewers if they so desire. As for the future of In Range, please return to the longer format. The quality of your work will bear it out. I folks need more time for viewership, the will find it. The short attention span format seems just to be a hack job. Please, more from the old west? Thank you.

David Weis

I don't think this is a bad idea but I think the best compromise in this situation is to perhaps throw up specific videos that you think would crossover the best with forgotten weapons, like discussing and running historical gear. When doing so you can also inform the audience "If you want to see more of what Inrange how to offer check us out here, here, etc." This would allow you to get some exposure for Inrange on Forgottenweapons, allow you to "test the waters" before deciding if putting all Inrange content on Forgottenweapons is a good idea, and would justify maintaining a separate channel for all Inrange content that would possibly help avoid confusion by a complete merger. For me personally, I of course love and appreciate the efforts of both channels so If a total merger of the channels did occur I wouldn't really mind.

Bonfire Banter

Either way is good. Sorry, that doesn't really help. My point is we watch anyway. So I would do what makes the most FISCAL sense to you two. Being that we all give you money to do your program, I would say its safe to say that we trust your honest and clear approach to the future, past, and present. I dont think that will change in either event. But it would eliminate one more notification we regularly get on the phones. And I get enough.

Bill Smithem

While I would continue my support of both efforts, I question whether or not new viewers would sign up to support two different efforts on a single channel. From my perspective, stepping up cross promotion of both efforts would be the way to go.

Dithon1

I'd honestly keep them separate.

Gustavo Cerezo

I would have no problem with this arrangement and guess that most current supporters also wouldn't, but think that it will likely reduce the flow of new In Range patreon supporters. Publishing only some videos like David proposes is the way to go. Even better if you can upload different videos on related content on either channel, like for example a video on a certain firearm in Ian's personal collection on Forgotten Weapons and then some stages of that same gun being run in a 2 gun match on In Range.

Jacob Schaffer

I, and I imagine most viewers, are sub'ed to both so it probably wouldn't make much difference in terms of current viewership. I like some of the other suggestions of posting videos to both channels when the content is relevant and maybe doing a "crossover" type of video or series (although this would be less unusual as Ian is clearly a regular on InRange).

Gary Venable

I would prefer not to see the "mixing" of the two. They are two distinct entities with different focuses and formats. I think a better idea would be to have crossover content as others have mentioned.

Kyle Allen

Sorry for the long winded response. As someone that has been involved in running a business it would be a great business decision. Expansion of the channel would leave the opportunity to dump B roll footage on Inrange and expand the following through FW, increase likes, revenue, etc. I would completely support this action for that reason. HOWEVER what's the greater concern for InrangeTV, is it doing well(successful ) or doing good, and not in the sense of success but the right thing. You said this channel was for more than just fun stuff. Including education, training and the like. Your having issues with expanding the reach and this could be because Forgotten Weapons followers may not be interested in the 2GACM, mid tests, build projects, the things this channel is built around. This move probably wouldn't alienate them but may not gain the continued click traffic you're expecting either. Maybe change the marketing strategies of InrangeTV 1st? Love the content of each channel, thanks for taking time to read my comment.

Don Logan

Many gun people have strong opinions. Forgotten Weapons is a "just the facts" program and has little chance of "offending" anyone. InRange injects some opinions along with the facts (and the mud). Something you might consider is that Forgotten Weapons may lose "just the facts" type viewers if content is mixed with InRange, although InRange does try to present content using the scientific method. (mud test, matches, etc) I'm not sure how Forgotten Weapons "just the facts" type viewers would like "Old West Vignettes" or "Cyber Security and Hacking". Let me just say that I love it all and will continue to support both programs!

Thomas Bobay

I follow both channels, so I'll still see it regardless of where it is posted. If posting them all in the same place helps you, do it. You guys are doing great work, keep it up!

christopher

I say go for it, I watch both channels religiously anyway.

Matthew Jackson

I have no objection, but I also follow both very closely.

Shay Corley

My gut tells me that merging them on Youtube is a solid idea, but leaving them separate on Full30 would be prudent. I believe that merging them on Youtube will cast a wider net and it shouldn't bother the casual followers, and the more serious ones will be happy to make the jump to Full30 if they want to follow one, but not the other.

Sean Smith

Having just watched Ian's short video on the StG44 issues and questions, I think that is the perfect mix. At the end, his splash screen mentioned InRange as the sister channel and suggest subscriptions. Were I would not mind the 2 channels being mixed, I do think that it would alienate some viewers of both. I would continue to watch no matter what, and love both channels.

Jasper Welsch

Kyle Allen and Michael Moryc hit the nail on the head. I will continue to support both channels either way. In fact, between you two, Indy & Flo, Othias & Mae, and Bloke & the Chap; I watch very little regular TV anymore.

Sinan Ameti

I wouldn't mind the merging of the two either. I think it's a good way to promote InRange and make it more accessible for casual viewers on youtube but Shay Corley has a good point there, it's a good idea to keep them seperated on Full30.

Cade Rarick

Personally I don't mind at all. My only concern would be the potential to generate confusion among viewers who may not be Patreon supporters yet but who are interested. If they see it all as one channel, even though the content is branded different, they may only contribute to one or the other. I wouldn't want you guys to miss out on any funding you need to continue creating content in either channel. Maybe not a concern but it was the first thing that came to mind. Either way keep up the great work!

nirename

There will probably be a few unsubscribes from people who don't like varied content, in which case a "crossover" series of videos might be a smoother approach. Otherwise i subscribe to both, so i support the merge and hope it works.

IntsFallen13

I am okay with it, I would not prefer it. I enjoy that both channels have two clear and defined themes. I think merging it would muddle that. It does make sense from a financial perspective and if it allowed for higher quality content go for it!

Eric Meyer

I'm okay with it. Would you keep the in range channel intact as an archive and strictly post new content on forgotten weapons, or is there a plan to (eventually) move that content to FW as well?

Tariq Shaikh

i think it's a good move to broaden viewer base. i'd like to see an "inrange only" type of playlist within the forgotten weapons channel if you go that route

Redlock

I understand your wish to grow Inrange but I think you should allow it to happen in a more organic way. Please don't try to force it. Inrange is good. It will grow by itself. Keep these two very fine channels as they are, separate.

Russell Street

I watch and support both channels. So for me it wouldn't make much difference. From a marketing perspective I think you run the risk of muddying the waters and diluting your brands. Which might make it harder to actually grow the channels long term.

Lawrence Griffin

I support both and would prefer to keep them separate. The occasional inclusion of an Inrange episode that related to the mission of Forgotten Weapons would be OK ...

Nathan Fisher

I think I agree that the best sounding idea is to keep them separate BUT do more publication of InRange content on the forgotten weapons channel so that user base becomes more aware that the other channel exists. That's how I found InRange, a video on forgotten weapons where Ian talked about it or had you on, can't recall which.

xpoliisi

I think of "Forgotten Weapons" as a static, educational channel and of "InRange" as a kinetic, entertainment channel. While I would enjoy having all the content in one place, I don't see how you could keep the unique identity of each channel. I would hate to see FW get more kinetic or IR get more static.

Noel Cox

I think your idea will hurt the two channels more than it will help them. You will get fewer people contributing to InRange via Patreon because they will come to believe that the a donation to Forgotten Weapons supports InRange as well.

Nick R

I think the content of the two channels is different enough that posting all of it together would more detrimental to the brands than helpful. They both have a very defined 'feel' to them

Paul Gallagher

I am a Patreon supporter for both channels. My contributions to both channels are the same (but admittedly modest). Your channels are the only ones I support and it is because the high quality videos you all produce. I wish you only the best and would support whatever path you choose to take. Even if that means removing 50% of a worthwhile gun channels from Youtube. 

Martin Bouda

As I support both, I just got used to have them separate and independent. But idea of crossover episodes suggested here sounds very good.

Drakin Kubala

I am a supporter of both channels, as i think most Patreons are. I would keep them separate. Unless you plan on having Karl make some cameo's into forgotten weapons videos?

Craig E

Although I will continue to support both channels regardless, I would prefer that the channels be kept separate. The content of each channel is sufficiently different that I believe combining them would feel artificial and potentially harm their "identify." Perhaps a bit more promotion of InRange could be incorporated into certain Forgotten Weapons videos. For example, Karl could be a guest on Forgotten Weapons when he can provide special insight into the subject matter being discussed.

Stephen Woods

I feel that the two channels should remain separate, however an occasional crossover would be a good thing, especally if ian has an interesting weapon that cna be used in a two gun event, (e.g. a stocked Mauser C96).

Jonathan Hartley

Just to provide some perspective on the matter, I stumbled upon Forgotten Weapons before InRange TV on Youtube. I had no Idea InRange TV existed until I saw the Brethren Arms teaser trailer on the Forgotten Weapons Channel and was so curious about a HK53 that took AR mags that I couldn't resist checking out InRange. Since the cross-over method worked on me and there hasn't been all that many cross-over videos, I believe that increasing the influx of cross-over videos where appropriate on the Forgotten Weapons channel should be your first course of action. This will give InRange as a separate channel one more chance to catch up before going through such a drastic change as being incorporated into another channel. If this doesn't achieve the desired result I would then consolidate the two channels. This way I feel the transition would be me controlled rather than sporadic. I would avoid putting all of your cards on the table at once just in case it backfires. I completely understand your reasoning behind the proposed change, and I take no issue with it, my only worry would be if other people take issue.

Mongo

I enjoy and support both channels. The issue with combining them maybe that you loose some of your funding since those that support both on Patron would then only be supporting the same amount of funding for the combined channel thus losing the funding coming from Inrange Patron. This maybe offset by addition Youtube ad revenue so it might not hurt as well as a number of others that will increase the Forgotten Weapons Patron funding amounts. I personally do not care if you combine them since I watch both as long as we keep seeing content that was covered under both brands.

Terry

I think keeping the distinct branding is important. The meld becomes what? Inrange/Forgotten Weapons, Forgotten/Inrange, Insert new name here... Not sure it's vital to stay separate but I personally like the separation of content. FW is a binge channel for me. Whereas Inrange is a check back often channel. I agree with other that cross seeding videos is a great idea. Link one of Ian's FW Colt SAA videos to one of your Old West Vignettes or some such. My 2¢

Douglas Crowe

I'm thinking as well that the channels should remain separate. I also see nothing wrong with cross over content and cross referring the channels. Both channels are relevant to each other and so there is nothing wrong about working the existence of the other channel into either channels content. How about having Karl as a guest host on InRange? You two could easily double up on a visit to a museum, for example, or have Karl pick a couple of auction guns that he likes that fit the "forgotten" mold, and talk about them.

alexander callage

I would have no problem with it, thought I don't think it would be ideal. Regardless, you two make great content on both channels that I truely enjoy and learn from.

Paul Levy

Many other YouTube channels do this, mainly to separate different programming or shows. I don't see an issue with it.

Shawn D.

I subscribe to and support both channels, and prefer them separate, but would have no heartburn if they were combined.

Kyle

I fear that you may find your new Patreon contributions getting directed to Forgotten Weapons by default. You can try to explain that the two projects are separate until you are blue in the face and provide links in bold psychedelic font and people will still tend to send support to Forgotten Weapons at the expense of InRange. Maybe Ian should add an appeal to the end of each of his videos to check out InRange and put in a link to InRange content.

Kim Jensen

My thoughts is that its maybe best to keep them seperate, but do crossovers etc between the two channels

Hunter Callahan

Bad idea to merge them. More mentions of Inrange on Forgotten Weapons videos where relevant ia a great idea.

Gabriel Arambula

Just joined today. The quality of both channels has improved substantially, and together would be better.

Jonathan Beland

I support both channels and would have no problem with them merging on YouTube. That would be a great way to expand the overall audience in one fell swoop. Though I really wonder who someone could be a dedicated Forgotten Weapons fan and know nothing about InRange, and vice-versa.

Koji Peterson

Pro - Response (as in yes) with a caveat that's been expressed multiple times: You're going to have a hell of a time getting people to distinguish the two patreons. I'm thrilled Ian has created the monster that is FW and there's no reason these two love projects shouldn't just get in bed together. That said, even if some potential InRange patrons are misdirected to FW, it's going to likely be more than would have independently found InRange TV.

Thomas Erickson

I have no objection as long as both maintain the current level of quality and quantity. The content on both is quite different from other firearms oriented channels and I find it more interesting and informative. I knew In Range was not getting as much support as Forgotten Weapons which is why I decided to contribute to In Range. I believe most of your regular viewers are more than intelligent enough to distinguish between the two and contribute as they wish.

Brandon

I agree with those that agree that the idea would likely hurt InRange more than it would benefit it, despite the fact that I "watch them interchangeably", referring to you guys by first name rather than by channel name when passing on something I saw/heard (usually to my wife, late at night, while she's desperately trying to fall asleep But It Will Only Be Another Sec, Honey, I Swear). There's also the issue that, if you were to publish on FW, you would occasionally have to double-post on a given day or else not get the "combined content" out as frequently; I personally don't like channels to post more than one video a day, as I like to be able to watch them soon enough that any comments I post are still relevant, but like most people(..? Heh) I've got a limited amount of time I can sit around watching videos each day. (EDIT: On second thought I guess this point is only partly valid, as I am *already* "watching two Ian/Karl videos a day" on days that FW and IRTV both post. So in that respect it might be nicer to not have the second. *However*, that would still mean double-posts on some days, or some days where there is "no FW content" because it's IRTV instead, which might be a turn-off to those individuals who aren't into both channels.) Also like others have said, I *do* think that changing the end-slate of FW videos to link to InRange content, and creating an InRange end slate to link back to FW videos, is a good idea. It takes a little extra production time, but the whole "here's two related videos, click on them!" thing is so prevalent on YT that it's almost strange that you guys *don't* already do that. It makes total sense to me that, every time you guys do a 2-gun match, to link to a FW video showcasing a gun you're using and/or a IRTV mud test or what-not video with the same. (I've noticed that Ian has the habit of saying "I've got another video about XYZ, I'll link it in the description below"...but then he doesn't actually link it.)

Tucker Deines

I support both channels, I can only modestly support inrange on patreon though. I chose to support InRange as opposed to the other channel to promote the content and have it serve as my go to spot for another niche. If you combine them into being one posting channel I would be fine with that. I often have to look to see if you've even posted because of youtube's anti gun agenda and bad metrics on putting things in my face that I actually want to watch. I appreciate what it is that you guys do, and would like for you guys to continue to grow your success. So, by all means do it, as long as you don't dilute what InRange is about.

Kirk Trofatter

I contribute to both channels on Patreon, and watch both. I would continue if you merged, however, I fear that a merger may hurt both, confusion of new contributors, etc. I will be there either way, as long as you don't change what you are doing.

Chad Buermele

I don't see any issue with it. I enjoy both channels.

Gun Websites

I would suggest keeping them separate, and doing "Crossover" vids more often

Pest666

I watch everything you do on both channels, so whatever you decide won't affect me at all.

Daniel del Portillo

While I do throw a buck into the hat of both channels, I am more of a Forgotten Weapons fan and would be afraid of a change of format. The banter between Karl and Ian may lead to interesting conversations which can be entertaining, but the "History Channel" style presentation of an interesting weapon along side it's breakdown is what I love and would hate to see it obtain more "In Range" elements. As long as the basic Forgotten Weapons format is left alone, I'm happy.

Jose Kretschek

Ooops, wrong button... not withstanding that, I sponsor both channels however miserly and cross feed would be transparent to me. Having said that, it may not be transparent to you since the channels are financially independent and FW could divert sponsors that are hoping in due to the inRange content and end up mislead to support the wrong (not really but you get the jist) channel.

Evan Jones

I'm a patreon of both channels and enjoy both quite a lot, but I'd prefer that they stay separate. I certainly wont stop watching, I just think both channels do totally different things. I do however like the idea of crossover videos, hell I wouldn't even mind if Karl presented FW videos. I'd especially like to see more videos in which forgotten weapons are fired or even just more in depth look at how they were used in the context of the time they were created, which I think would go well on either channel. Ultimately, it's not a deal breaker for me either way, just my .02

TDC

As long as the basic formats remain the same how you distribute the shows doesn't bother me. My views mirror Evan Jones comments. Thank you for your great shows.

Alex Akai

Do what you got to do to continue to grow and create content

Kenan Comer

Both channels fulfill a niche and do it well. Merging content could alienate people who like one or the other. I watch both religiously, and am a patron of both, but both channels have there own look and focused content that I appreciate. I like going to InRangeTv knowing what I'm going to get. The same applies to FW. I think more overt advertising of InRangeTv on FW would yield more viewers and support for InRange. Maybe a short compilation trailer of InRangeTv content on FW and a call out at the end of FW videos. Or even a short commercial for InRange at the end of FW videos (10-15 seconds). Just brainstorming.

Robert Arthur

There are many popular channels that have different content (branded as different "shows"), but not in the gun Youtube community. At least, not that I can recall. You would be within the mainstream of Youtube channels to combine into one channel, but you would be outside the mainstream for gun-oriented content. If you look at a mainstream channel with different shows, like Geek & Sundry, they use the thumbnails to develop distinct brands for the different content. They repeat that branding in their social media promotions. I think it would be worthwhile for you to refresh the branding for your different shows on each channel, so that viewers can distinguish the different content. Then, you can decide which shows work best on FW and which work best on IR. Personally, I think the historical content should be on FW, including the old west vignettes. IR should have your range and review content. You can work the branding from there, because FW has more of an academic/documentary feel, while IR is more action and fun.