Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Ok, that question solicited a lot of responses! Thank you! :)

Here's the non-scientific analysis:

4 videos are preferred to 1.

Split-screen runs are generally disregarded but some people really like them.

Pre and post match analysis is essential.

So here's what I'll be doing going forward:

Stages will be individual videos with pre and post analysis, as always.

Split screen will be retained but will be LAST segment of the video, after our stage discussion and post analysis.   If you like it, it'll be right at the end.  If you don't care for it, just shut the video down post discussion.

This sounds like the best middle ground.

~Karl

Comments

Timothy S Hennessey

That'll work for me. Thank you for asking for our feedback.

Adrian

Perfect! Thanks!

Louis W. Reuter II

If you didn't do what I answered, why did you ask, lol. Sounds fine. I enjoy your content regardless of format. Just keep em coming.

Emalkartha

Sounds amazing, I've always been a huge fan of the two gun ACM matches, can't wait for the next ones.

Keith McNab

I can live with this, I'm just happy you guys solicited us.

David Rahn

Sounds like a great format to do it in, Thanks for keeping us in the loop Karl.

OldGreyBeast

Was hoping for a single video, but oh well. I can keep doing how I've been doing. It's neat getting input anyway.

Brandon

As always Karl, thanks for asking for our feedback and thank you for going with a fair and balanced take when, as we all know, "you can't satisfy everyone." Although I "got what I wanted" in this case, even if I hadn't I would have been confident that your (and Ian's, if he weren't out gallivanting around the world...) would have been logical and unbiased and I would have supported it wholeheartedly anyway. Keep up the good work! :D

Jay O'Balles

Hm sounds like you might be able to make it within Minds max size of 1024 Mb

The Dude

Please only let 2 days max between videos. Ideally a new part each day. It's hard to keep track of previous rounds if you spread them out.

Casey

Sounds like a good format. I didn't like the split screen at first, but seeing the little nuances was kind of cool. It really brings out the differences between you two. Karl is typically the better short, but Ian is fast and nimble.

C.j. Singleton

Sounds good I've been loving the format you guys have been using but I do typically skip the split screen portion

Thomas Stancomb

Sounds great. I look forward to future videos.

Shay Corley

Sounds like the best of all worlds. Keep up the great work! I look forward to seeing more videos soon.

Mike Hubler

Sounds fair. Tje only time i watch the side by side is when Ian whoops your butt.

Frank E McGillivray

Thanks for all the extra, non-fun effort.; who knew there would be so much production work. I'm old, so have a longer attention span, but will take your work in whatever format/time there is. Keep up the sense of humour and whimsey, it's gold.

Leonard T Schmandt

When a question is asked how many minutes do we have to answer before you tally the results. I seem to answer a question on the same day it is asked only to find out that the results were tallied some time earlier.

Andrew MacDougall

Break it up. I watch your videos often in the morning over breakfast. Don't have time for a 45 min video and its a bi-ahch to try to find the same video again tomorrow, get back to where I left off and pick up again. Lotta wasted time. Also split screens are dumb.

Maave

Good solution, even though I missed the initial vote/discussion

stanley a bourdon

I am sure leaving a question open for less than 6 hours fails to give your patrons a fair shot at responding. I do not sit in front of a screen at all times. If it is worth asking the Question, it is worth allowing enough time for a substantially large portion of your patrons to see it and respond. I think 24 hours a good compromise for most questions.

Andrew MacDougall

^^^ This is why I watch InRange. There are lots of guys run'n'guning on YT.

Bruce Brodnax

I'm a big fan of the split screen, and think that the post-analysis "rehash" is an excellent solution [even best solution, regardless of whether or not some mentally challenged viewers don't find it worth watching!] ;-)

William meadows

Good choice not a fan of the split screen but really enjoy the analysis.

Aitor

Good decision

Ben Pye

Sounds great, personally I love the breakdowns and could listen to you guys ramble all day!

Mikael V.

that seems like a very good solution. I do sometimes skip the split screen, but it can give excellent insight into what can cost time and how much. I have a couple times skipped straight TO the split screen; at times you can be in a different kind of watching mood for lack of a better word. When controlling the video is so easy these days it really is smart to give the viewer a bit of extra, especially if the format of the clips is set and predictable. It'd be nice if you held on for answers for more than a few hours. A day perhaps? Some get online maybe every other day, or sometimes you don't have time to make a thought out response on the spot. From this side of the screen, some of the questions posed to the audience have kinda flown by. I'm sure you get a plethora of responses almost instantly, by I hope you consider it nonetheless. Cheers.

ZombieM0ses

I applaud this choice. Sometimes I'll sit back and watch the split screen, but often I'm rushing to catch up so I prefer just to skip to the post-analysis. Definitely think this re-work of the format should make most everyone happy.

Ian Gratton

Sound good to me Karl! Cheers!+