Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Poll

"Shrinking Virus 2" FX Vote

  • NO Booms and Shakes; Release in November 12
  • YES Booms and Shakes; Release in December 39
  • YES Booms and Shakes; Release in December, BUT also make a version with no shaking. 17
  • 2024-11-11
  • —2024-11-15
  • 68 votes
{'title': '"Shrinking Virus 2" FX Vote', 'choices': [{'text': 'NO Booms and Shakes; Release in November', 'votes': 12}, {'text': 'YES Booms and Shakes; Release in December', 'votes': 39}, {'text': 'YES Booms and Shakes; Release in December, BUT also make a version with no shaking.', 'votes': 17}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2024, 11, 15, 17, 0, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2024, 11, 11, 23, 32, 52, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 68}

Content

Alright, so the FX/animation are still being worked on for this clip, and it's very in-depth compared to a lot of other projects. There are a good amount of near-misses at floor-level, and animation of the tiny guy reacting to that. So I started thinking: with a project with so much put into the FX already, I wonder if things like booming sounds and visual shakes for the footsteps should be used.

On one hand, it takes a lot of extra work, and it can get cartoonish, or even annoying. For a video like this, it would extend the editing time. On the other hand, it can add a lot to the immersion value, the feeling of scale, and the drama.

Ordinarily, I will just make a gut choice for this type of thing, but when talking about a video in which there might be hundreds of footsteps, it will certainly affect the editing time. In fact, I think it would push the video into December. In that case, I would find a video that's quicker to edit to release in November.

Part of me says "Why not go all-out?" ... The other part says "Because time."

So this really feels like a good time to ask you guys: Booms and Shakes, or No?

UPDATE: Vote "NO" if you want me to make a Booms and Shakes version LATER (December or after) as a Star Patron bonus.

Comments

LittleGuyGames

I love the booms and shakes personally. Get me more in the feeling if ya know.

Blamph

If we want a release in November, would there be no chance of a boom and shakes version down the line?

Subsin13

Okay, Let's assume booms and shakes could be added later for a Star Patron release. If you want that, just vote for the first option: "NO"

HortenseMoon4

Booms and shakes but don’t overdo it. Really hate it when there are booms that sound all cartoony like rocks being smashed. Just firm, quick booms that are not excessively loud and stupid

Fred Fredson

I like the booms and shakes but not to a ridiculous degree. I think the first Shrinking Virus had great-sounding booms, so I guess I'd ask to try to recreate that with the effects.

tiger balls

The sound effects and booms make it feel so real and separates the quality of other videos and people that make this type of content, Fully fine on waiting. Appreciate you man man! You are kicking ass on these. Diet soda still my favorite video, and shrinking virus is my second. Those types of videos are what I live for 👍🏼 and the subtle booms and light shaking enhance it substantially

Anirus Fere

I'm in the minority here, which is just fine. I'm weird, haha. I don't like booms and shakes. Always takes me out of it. I adore just... Regular audio, because it makes the tinies getting squished feel *smaller* to me. Like they're just smol and insignificant. Booms and shakes to me always feel... Tacky. But that's just my personal preference. I understand why people like it. It's just never been my cup of tea. I personally think having both would be the best option for everyone to be happy but it's up to democracy to decide!

Kilo Bug

Love the booms especially when it's paired with slow motion. You are the best in the biz at it. I feel like it's part of the brand!