take raffle winners out for 1 month so they can't potentially win repeatedly8
leave them in, potential for repeats be damned2
a secret third option (if you choose this PLEASE comment what that option might be)1
{'title': 'Raffle deets need opinion', 'choices': [{'text': "take raffle winners out for 1 month so they can't potentially win repeatedly", 'votes': 8}, {'text': 'leave them in, potential for repeats be damned', 'votes': 2}, {'text': 'a secret third option (if you choose this PLEASE comment what that option might be)', 'votes': 1}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2024, 10, 2, 22, 46, 3, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 11}
Content
Pls read and vote!
Okay so, since i'm doing a handful of people this month and last month for the nsfw raffle, since I forgot about that perk until last month, i want to make it equal to everybody so that it doesn't end up being the same people over and over again. Normally it'll only be a single person pulled, and I am using a random wheel to pick but still, I worry about any sort of unfairness or rng bias in the system, and I want it to be fully transparent and honest !!
SO the question becomes:
Should I implement it so that the folks/person who won the previous month is taken out of the current month's running for that month?
For Example: if x person wins in june, should they be kept out of july's options, and put back in for august?
is only available to registered users.
Visit the login page if you have an account.
Otherwise visit the registration page to create one.