Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Poll

A Show of Hands...

  • Yes, it toooootally makes sense to release an AUGUST package in SEPTEMBER. ✨ 11
  • No, you're insane. Make it make sense. 🤔 1
  • Don't care. JUST BRING ME MORE PREGNANT MEN IN 4K. 🫃 51
  • 2025-09-02
  • 63 votes
{'title': 'A Show of Hands...', 'choices': [{'text': 'Yes, it toooootally makes sense to release an AUGUST package in SEPTEMBER. ✨', 'votes': 11}, {'text': "No, you're insane. Make it make sense. 🤔", 'votes': 1}, {'text': "Don't care. JUST BRING ME MORE PREGNANT MEN IN 4K. 🫃", 'votes': 51}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2025, 9, 2, 13, 17, 40, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 63}

Content

IS THE MONTHLY PACKAGE NAMING CONVENTION CONFUSING OR WHAT?

I'm going to a run a quick poll to get a sense of how people feel about the package naming conventions. I've seen the use of months as a package name be perceived as 'confusing' and some creators make changes. While I don't get too many complaints about it, I have been wondering if there's a general sense that releasing X month's package in the following Y month (e.g. August 2025 releasing in September 2025) makes sense to people.

So here's a dumb poll about a fairly trivial thing if you'd like to contribute your two cents. 😅

At the moment, the alternative is quite literally just numbering them instead (Like in the E-shop).

Comments

No comments found for this post.