Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Game Changer S4E10 Watch A Long (Patreon)

Published:
2026-11-06 16:02:22
Imported:
2026-11
Tags:

Videos

  • 778950875.mp4

Downloads

Content

Hey Peaches! The game isn't over! After Brennan's masterful gameplay at the end of the last episode, can he stay ahead of the rest of the remaining competition and secure victory? Or will another rise to the challenge to claim the prize?

Files

Comments

commas-and-ampersands (edited)

Comment edits

2026-11-07 20:00 I don't know if this is of any interest, but just in case you're still wondering, the reason why Lou admitted to the Katie thing is that imho there's basically 3 main winner criteria considered in modern Survivor. 1) Challenges wins and overall challenge performance. Obviously, Brennan dominated here by being a "challenge beast." He won every gameplay individual immunity idol, which made it that much more impressive that he went out with an idol in his pocket even after playing another idol on Erika. Lou, however, not only did very well in the challenges overall, but he's the only person who managed to get Brennan out in a challenge before individual immunity. 2) Social game. Jay, I don't know if you remember this from Survivor season 1, but the idea of the show originally was that the winner would come down mostly if not solely to challenge wins. IIRC Richard Hatch, who sucks as a human but did a lot to make the show what it is today, started the concept of alliances to keep himself and his allies in the game. He won the first season due at least in part to that innovation. A lot of people hated it at the time (though the homophobia was certainly another factor), but now that's just standard practice and you really can't win without it. I'd say Lou and Brennan are pretty even there given that they were in an alliance with one another, never broke it, and also didn't really upset anyone else (with one major exception). 3) Big moves. This is where Lou dominated and why he won. His big move is of course the "blindside" as in he blindsided Katie by voting for her when everyone thought the vote was on Sam for the bit. Lou deciding to go for the kill shows he's willing to play hard and smart and strategically. Bitter jurors are a thing (and Katie was one of them, no shade), but like, it is a game and it's a bold, impressive thing to do from the jump. Like, you could just as easily call Survivor Traitors on a Beach - the lying is a big part of it. So being able to pull off that lie, keep it from everyone, and then do a big dramatic reveal at final tribal... chef's kiss, no notes, hope he had a great trip wherever he went.
2026-11-06 18:37 I don't know if this is of any interest, but just in case anyone's still wondering, the reason why Lou admitted to the Katie thing is that imho there's basically 3 main winner criteria considered in modern Survivor. 1) Challenges wins and overall challenge performance. Obviously, Brennan dominated here by being a "challenge beast." He won every gameplay individual immunity idol, which made it that much more impressive that he went out with an idol in his pocket even after playing another idol on Erika. Lou, however, not only did very well in the challenges overall, but he's the only person who managed to get Brennan out in a challenge before individual immunity. 2) Social game. Jay, I don't know if you remember this from Survivor season 1, but the idea of the show originally was that the winner would come down mostly if not solely to challenge wins. IIRC Richard Hatch, who sucks as a human but did a lot to make the show what it is today, started the concept of alliances to keep himself and his allies in the game. He won the first season due at least in part to that innovation. A lot of people hated it at the time (though the homophobia was certainly another factor), but now that's just standard practice and you really can't win without it. I'd say Lou and Brennan are pretty even there given that they were in an alliance with one another, never broke it, and also didn't really upset anyone else (with one major exception). 3) Big moves. This is where Lou dominated and why he won. His big move is of course the "blindside" as in he blindsided Katie by voting for her when everyone thought the vote was on Sam for the bit. Lou deciding to go for the kill shows he's willing to play hard and smart and strategically. Bitter jurors are a thing (and Katie was one of them, no shade), but like, it is a game and it's a bold, impressive thing to do from the jump. Like, you could just as easily call Survivor Traitors on a Beach - the lying is a big part of it. So being able to pull off that lie, keep it from everyone, and then do a big dramatic reveal at final tribal... chef's kiss, no notes, hope he had a great trip wherever he went.

I don't know if this is of any interest, but just in case anyone's still wondering, the reason why Lou admitted to the Katie thing is that imho there's basically 3 main winner criteria considered in modern Survivor. 1) Challenges wins and overall challenge performance. Obviously, Brennan dominated here by being a "challenge beast." He won every gameplay individual immunity idol, which made it that much more impressive that he went out with an idol in his pocket even after playing another idol on Erika. Lou, however, not only did very well in the challenges overall, but he's the only person who managed to get Brennan out in a challenge before individual immunity. 2) Social game. Jay, I don't know if you remember this from Survivor season 1, but the idea of the show originally was that the winner would come down mostly if not solely to challenge wins. IIRC Richard Hatch, who sucks as a human but did a lot to make the show what it is today, started the concept of alliances to keep himself and his allies in the game. He won the first season due at least in part to that innovation. A lot of people hated it at the time (though the homophobia was certainly another factor), but now that's just standard practice and you really can't win without it. I'd say Lou and Brennan are pretty even there given that they were in an alliance with one another, never broke it, and also didn't really upset anyone else (with one major exception). 3) Big moves. This is where Lou dominated and why he won. His big move is of course the "blindside" as in he blindsided Katie by voting for her when everyone thought the vote was on Sam for the bit. Lou deciding to go for the kill shows he's willing to play hard and smart and strategically. Bitter jurors are a thing (and Katie was one of them, no shade), but like, it is a game and it's a bold, impressive thing to do from the jump. Like, you could just as easily call Survivor Traitors on a Beach - the lying is a big part of it. So being able to pull off that lie, keep it from everyone, and then do a big dramatic reveal at final tribal... chef's kiss, no notes, hope he had a great trip wherever he went.

zehloani

Can anyone tell me what Adam says at the begining of most episodes... Something like, "Today's we're going to react, review ...[SOMETHING IN A LOW BREATHY VOICE]... and at the end we're going to..." I feel like it's an inside joke that developed before I started watching them and I can't figure it out... In this one he does it like 17 seconds in.

TJ

He says "React, Review, A' Rifff" Like riffing on or expanding an idea

Ninja

He's saying "riff"