Home
Creators
Search Recent Missing Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Episode #127 ... Gilles Deleuze pt. 3 (Patreon)

Published:
2019-02-09 16:04:10
Imported:
2026-06
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • Deleuze_3.mp3

Missing 1 full-res photo, 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

Episode 127 ... Gilles Deleuze pt. 3

Thank you for listening! :)

Files

Previews only

Comments

David Smith

Tell us more about Deleuze and Guattari, BWO's

Keenan Parker

I love so much how you tie everything together.

Luis Durand

Thanks for another fantastic episode. BTW, there is no transcript of episode 124, 125, and 126 neither a post for this episode. I hope you are getting better

Hannes

I’m a big fan of the thinkers inspired by deleuze (Franco Berardi for example) but have always found their writing somewhat impenetrable. So I’m really grateful for this series and I hope it continues for a long time :-)

richard de la Sota

This series has been great, thank you so much. Listened to every episode many multiple times, keep it coming. Love you so much. My favorite podcast out of all Iisten to.

Dean Kerma

I really love this podcast, it's my fave, but I need someone to explain to me how machines can be made up of just machines rather than by specific components. A machine has components that are not in totality machines themselves. Am I thinking too literally or is there a flaw to the reasoning behind the machine metaphor? I understand how machines are interconnected with respect to social movements and all that, but inside a machine there are components that are required for a machine to function. Where are components in this idea of everything being machines? I'm not saying there's nothing to it, but it's not wholly correct or complete as far as I can tell, but I'm probably misunderstanding something 🤦.

Georgy Kishtoo

This was the first episode I came across while looking for information about Deleuze and Guattari and is still my favourite. Your explanations blew my mind right away and made me a fan. Thanks a lot.

Kostas
>>37880970

If I understand correctly, you could see components as machines in itself again. So a machine consists of machines.

David Lessem

Thanks for this. I've been struggling through Capitalism and Schizophrenia, and this really helped clarify things (and also showed me I really shouldn't have started D&G with that book.) One small criticism is that I feel you handwaved D&Gs Marxism and somewhat mischaracterized their view on capitalism. Marxism isn't "another rigid system" — it's a belief that certain forces in capitalism will undermine it, leading to a rearrangement of class power — a phase of proletarian rule and, eventually, a classless society. Marx was very scrupulous about not prescribing how that future society would be arranged. For D to call himself a Marxist means, at minimum, that he believes in this trajectory. You also make him seem more positive about capitalism than he really was. He repeatedly calls it "the nightmare of all previous civilizations," and claims that it unleashes a force of repression far greater than any previous system. D&G certainly saw opportunities within capitalism, just as they would have seen opportunities in feudalism or "primitive" society — but those opportunities were defined in opposition to the limits capitalism imposes. Additionally, D&G are generally very positive about Marx and their criticisms of Marx are much fewer and generally fairly mild compared to their attacks on Freud. Foucault actually remarks on it in the intro. Anyway, just my 2 cents. Overall, a really good series on Deleuze.