Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Just in case you missed it, I thought I'd share the unlisted reaction video to my reaction video.

Brady told me he had a new Parker Square video coming up on Numberphile and so I filmed a reaction video which was hidden as an unlisted video on the Numberphile second channel. If people watched to the end of the main video they would find it (or look at the pinned comment). I then made a second-order reaction video which was unlisted on my second channel.

But to make your life easier: here is the whole saga in one easy list.

0. Magic Squares of Squareshttps://youtu.be/Kdsj84UdeYg1. Matt Parker Reacts to Magic Squares of Squareshttps://youtu.be/U9dtpycbFSY2. Matt Parker Reacts to Matt Parker Reacting to Magic Squares of Squares https://youtu.be/tD2q2-_5Tyc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD2q2-_5Tyc

Files

Matt Parker reacts to Matt Parker Reacting to Magic Squares of Squares

Main video "Magic Squares of Squares (are PROBABLY impossible)": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdsj84UdeYg Matt Parker Reacts to Magic Squares of Squares: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9dtpycbFSY] Matt Parker reacts to Matt Parker Reacting to Magic Squares of Squares: you are looking at it right now. THERE ARE NO MORE

Comments

John L

I see what you’ve done there, it’s Parker squared

hong mao lan tu qi xia zhuan

But how many emails have you gotten that asked THIS: "What if instead of squaring each square individually, you squared the whole square, treating it as a matrix, where the square of that matrix is a magic square?"

Luna

I appreciate the correct numbering of the videos.