Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Re-uploaded with corrected ammo data.

Files

Previews only

Small Arms of WWI Primer 042: French Model 92 Espagnol a S&W K-Frame Copy

Othais and Mae delve into the story of this WWI classic. Complete with history, function, and live fire demonstration. C&Rsenal presents its WWI Primer series; covering the firearms of this historic conflict one at a time in honor of the centennial anniversary. Join us every other Tuesday! Additional reading: The Revolver 1889-1914 AWF Taylerson Smith and Wesson 1857 - 1945 Barnes French Service Handguns 1858-2004 Medlin & Huon The K-Frame Revolver Mullin You can now find these and other books through our A-store. When buying through this link we receive a small commission that goes on to help with production. http://astore.amazon.com/candrprimer-20 Historical music from this episode: Ils n'passeront pas Marcelly Dinah Peerless Quartet Original music provided by Melissa Hyman of The Moon and You http://www.themoonandyou.com/ Safe range space thanks to Shoot Logic http://www.shootlogic.com/ In collaboration with The Great War https://www.youtube.com/user/TheGreatWar Additional photos thanks to Rock Island Auction Ammunition data thanks to DrakeGmbH https://www.youtube.com/user/DrakeGmbH/ Visit us at http://candrsenal.com Or go further and support our channel at https://www.patreon.com/CandRsenal Current funding level: $3015

Comments

Joseph S.

Being a New England native, your pronunciation of Worcester and Connecticut had me cracking up.

Christopher Dooley

I keep meaning to ask this on the rifle segments: Which is "better": a cock-on-open bolt action or a cock-on-close? Does either system present a clear advantage for either the shooter (ease of manipulation, better/easier extraction or feed, safer, more reliable, easier to clean/clear of mud, etc.) or the army as a whole (is one easier/cheaper to buy, fewer parts, easier to maintain, etc.)? I would THINK that a cock on close system would make more sense due to the fact that you're spreading out the functions of primary extraction and cocking the action over two muscle movements, rather than trying to do both with a single 90-degree rotation of the bolt, but I have nothing to back that opinion with. Both systems are pretty well represented in the military rifles of the early 20th century, so I'm wondering what Othais and Mae's opinions are from a technical as well as a shooter perspective.

Joseph S.

It might have been a Forgotten Weapons episode, but I remember watching a video that mentioned cock-on-close had a slight advantage for a higher firing rate as you could gain momentum when closing the bolt to reset the striker. Rather than having to fight the force of the spring while unlocking the bolt and cycling the action. If I've got my facts right, it's also the basis of the Brit's "Mad Minute" with the SMLE and how they trained pre-WWI for fast and accurate shooting with it.