Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

OK, THIS one is the Bladesinger UA (doing so many videos they are getting mixed up in my head).
And as of now, I am taking a break from working on videos until I'm back from vacation.
(Also, I'm aware of the error with the level 18 feature on the Spellfire Sorcerer, I've pinned the correcting comment and a slightly edited version will be released publically)

Files

Previews only

Bladesinger Wizard UA: Dnd 5.5

If you like what I do and would consider supporting this channel through Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Treantmonkstemple Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 2:21 Level 3 8:08 Level 6 9:04 Level 10 9:22 Level 14 13:55 Final Thoughts

Comments

Adam Gillis

Ok looking the last one. My interpretation of the 14th level feat. Yes if you use cantrip from your muilti attack it does allow you to make that bonus action attack. They would have said when you take the magic action or cast a spell of first level or higher. They didn't. They said a spell with a casting time of an action. Which you muiti attack feature calls out.

John Oakley

I like the updates a lot. And I agree that lvl 14 stacks will cantrip of lvl 6. But it would help to spell it out to prevent confusion.

Braden Young

It’s important to note that the Valor Bard’s Battle Magic feature has the exact same wording as this Bladesinger’s Song of Victory feature.

Luke Tomlinson

I think bladework makes optimising bladesingers a bit simpler too - it was an awkward trade-off deciding whether to buff dex first and get your weapon attacks online, or intelligence first and get your spells online - this makes it nice & simple - you max out intelligence first, then come back for dex later. The cantrip interaction of the level 14 feature is little more than flavour really - you can get the BA attack just by using TWF. All this would do is effectively let you use TWF without having a second weapon. If a DM doesn’t allow it, ok, fine - I used twf for the last 13 levels, i’ll just carry on with that.

James Brannen

Don't see any reason why it wouldn't work? Not sure it needs clarification

KillerKam211

Is the Two-Handed or Heavy restriction still necessary? Non-heavy would be a extra ave DPR of +1 (1d8 -> 1d10), and Heavy now has a Str req of 13, so you would be MAD for Int, Dex, Con (for Concentration), and then Str for just wanting a specific weapon. I'm not saying Bladesinger isn't already an amazing subclass, just curious why the restriction is still there

The Insanity of The Toilet

Man I was waiting patiently for the barbarian video, to only today discover they didn't add a new barbie class. Big sad Everyone knows wizards are just dudes who failed the big muscle exam at school 😤