Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

I’ll cut to the chase: using scales and grams for baking recipes is more accurate, it’s faster, and it means less cleanup. At home, I use an 11-pound baking scale from OXO that is no longer in production, but their new model has all the same functions. I also use a small coffee scale from Hario for measuring very small quantities.

OXO Good Grips 11-Pound Stainless Steel Food Scale with Pull-Out Display

Hario V60 Drip Scale and Timer

Let’s start with accuracy.

To demonstrate this, I measured out two separate cups of flour using two popular methods. The first I sifted, then spooned the flour into the cup before leveling it with the back of a knife. The second I used the “dip and sweep” method by scooping flour out of the bag with the measuring cup then leveling it.

The sifted flour weighed a little over 4 ounces (130g), while the dip-and-sweep flour weighed 5.25 ounces (160g)—a difference of over 25%.

In fact, in a more robust test I conducted years ago at Cook’s Illustrated using home cook volunteers as testing subjects, I found that when measuring by volume, cups of flour can vary between 4 ounces and 6 ounces—a full 50% difference!

This is a massive amount of variation and makes a correspondingly big difference in the consistency of your dough or batter, from overly stiff to downright soupy.

The point is: measuring flour by weight is far more accurate.

Measuring by weight has other advantages as well:

It’s faster. All you have to do is set your bowl on the scale, tare it, measure in your first ingredients, re-tare it, measure in your second, etc. No need to pull multiple cups and out of the drawer. It’s a simple, streamlined process. The only exceptions to this are ingredients added in such small amounts that a normal baking scale can’t measure them accurately. Think that quarter teaspoon of baking soda or a pinch of nutmeg.

It’s less messy. Instead of a half dozen cups and spoons to wash, all you’ve got is a single bowl—the same bowl you’d also have to get messy when measuring by volume. If you like to be very precise (which I often do), you’ll at most need one large bowl and baker’s scale and a smaller bowl and jeweler’s scale for measuring small amounts of ingredients (like salt and yeast).

And bonus! Most models sport a nifty backlit seven-segment display. I’m a fan of efficiency and smart technology, and the seven-segment display (you know, the kind you find on alarm clocks and… digital scales) are peak efficiency and smartness. They were invented in the early 20th century and are still useful nearly 125 years later. (I'm still waiting on a Technology Connections video about them)

So you tell me, but if I had the opportunity to get away with life only ever having to wash my torso and occasionally my big toe (while still staying clean), being faster, and sporting a nifty backlit seven-segment display on my forehead, I’d jump at the chance.

But Why Metric?

Why use metric units? What’s wrong with my good ol’ freedom units?

I’m not sure if you’ve noticed, but the U.S. ain’t exactly in great standing currently. But if that’s not reason enough to switch to metric for baking, consider baker’s percentages.

Any dough or batter recipe can be broken down into what are called baker’s percentages. The basic idea is that If we consider the weight of the flour to be 100%, we can express the weight of every other ingredient as a percentage of the weight of the flour.

For instance, if a dough recipe calls for 100 grams of flour, 2 grams of salt, 1 gram of yeast, and 55 grams of water, we’d say that the basic dough recipe is

100% flour

2% salt

1% yeast

55% water (also known as "55% hydration")

If we double that recipe to 200 grams of flour, the percentages remain the same. In fact, we can use any amount of flour we’d like, and by using baker’s percentages, it’s easy to figure out how to scale the other ingredients. This makes doubling, tripling, halving, 2.6’ing or π’ing a recipe relatively simple.

Percentages, which are based on a base-10 system, dovetail nicely with metric units, which also work in base 10. 1,000 grams to a kilogram, 1,000 milliliters to a liter, etc.

The U.S. Customary System (sometimes called the Imperial system) of volume measures is utterly confounding when it comes to scaling or dividing. A tablespoon is made of three teaspoons. A cup is made of 16 tablespoons. A quart is made of 4 cups, and a gallon is made of 4 quarts. An ounce is not even an ounce in the U.S.! You have to specify whether you are measuring ounces (a unit of mass) or fluid ounces (a measure of volume). A fluid ounce of water weighs 1.043 ounces, ferchrissakes!

It’s Harry Potter monetary system levels of silly. No, it’s worse. It’s quidditch rules levels of silly.

These days I write my recipes with all three units (volume, US customary, and metric) listed because I know there are still plenty of folks out there who don’t own or use a scale. But if you’ve got one, I strongly urge you to use the mass measures, especially when baking!

So how much does a cup weigh?

We’ve seen that a cup of flour can vary hugely in weight depending kn how it’s measured. Depending on your recipe source, the typical equivalency ranges from 120 grams per cup up to 145 grams per cup.

In all my recipes, I use an equivalency of 140 grams per cup, which is the equivalent of close to 5 ounces — the same equivalency that I’ve been using since my days at Cook’s Illustrated.

Whatever recipe you follow, make sure you know what equivalency they are using if the ingredients aren’t spelled out with mass in the first place. Or better yet, don’t use a baking recipe that doesn’t include mass measurements!

Which scales should I get?

The OXO scale has been a favorite of mine for over a decade now. It’s fast and accurate, slim enough to store on its side, and has a pull-out face so you can get easy readings even with a large bowl on top of it.

The Hario V60 scale is what I use for coffee. It measures in grams and has a built in timer, though if you don’t want any of the bells and whistles, any tiny jewelers scale can do the job of measuring small quantities.

OXO Good Grips 11-Pound Stainless Steel Food Scale with Pull-Out Display

Hario V60 Drip Scale and Timer

Do any of you have other tips or tricks for speeding up the baking process or making it more foolproof?

Files

Comments

Michael C

I’ve been using the V60 for small amounts and it’s great. One note about it: it doesn’t register until the weight measured is 2g or more even after you tare a container that certainly weights more than 2g. If you need to measure less than 2g just don’t tare the bowl and do the math in your head. For example if your bowl weights 31.7g and you need 1.5g then just add until the bowl weighs 33.2g.

Eden Grimaldi

I used to lament using European recipes that provided ingredients in grams. Now it’s the opposite..I always bake/cook with my scale and convert recipes that use the imperial system to metric. It’s sooo much more efficient and removes all that clutter of cups and leveling. One tip I taught myself through error is to measure the weight of my most used bowls and containers (recorded in my phone). That way if i eff up the tare I know the weight of the vessel I’m working with and can course correct.

Pseudonym No 4

This is a great article. Informative, concise and entertaining! I’d love a series on „how to make baking more fool proof“. I love cooking, but I’m still a baking noob. Do I need to sieve my flour, rest my dough, knead/mix gently or aggressively, use oil or butter etc pp.

Karole Sutherland

I can't wait for the day that all recipes from American sites use metric units and fervently hope that will include metric units for butter. Here in Canada, butter is sold in bricks weighing 454 gm so sticks of butter don't translate easily unless you know that 1 stick = 115 gm. Some cooking websites do a good job of translating many ingredients into metric but use sticks or tablespoons of butter. Similarly, they use liquid measurements for things like peanut butter or sour cream. It's so much easier to use weights. No wonder people don't like to cook and prefer Uber Eats!

Jan van Dorst

Great article! I strongly prefer measuring by weight as well. Do you have any good resources for density of ingredients, which I could use to convert units of volume in recipes to grams? I find that a lot of recipes mostly use cups, tablespoons and teaspoons, even some lovely recipes from The Food Lab

Christine

Speeding up baking? Raisenne Dough Riser (heated mat for faster proofing), Brod & Taylor Bread Proofer (with humidity and temp, esp for colder months), Using the fridge to make Dough night before and then proof day of to save time, flexible bowl scraper, bench knife, Baking Steel, plus a cast iron pan with ice cubes for hot oven help rise...

Misho

The conversion tables on the first and last page of The Food Lab are genius and really helpful! Thank you. They have helped me to almost learn one more set of units. If it is possible - could you include metrics units in your next books? The Oxo Scale looks amazing and it checks all the boxes. Especially the long auto Shut-off time - so many scales are shutting off in just a few seconds ... absolutely infuriating. Still sometimes it is not available in Europe. Among all crapy scales - I have encountered one that is really good: G&G KF6K. It might look a bit outdated but to me - it looks like a scale that was used in an old Italian shop.

Sujeet Akula

There's some benefit to using highly composite numbers too. It's not as relevant today, but it's worth acknowledging why they were used in the first place.

William Wroblicka

The problem is that many recipes on popular online cooking sites (e.g., TV Food Network, even some older recipes on ATK's site, not to mention those of all the amateur foodie bloggers) still do not specify ingredient amounts by weight and there are no standards for what given volumes of various ingredients should weigh.

TeddyBearBonfire

That tickles me haha, so you sell butter labelled in grams, but you actually sell it rounded to pounds (454g being 1lb). Just got a chuckle out of me to read that in this context of desiring metric measurements! We do it here in Scotland too—things are labelled in terms of their grams to sell, but are sold in numbers equivalent to rounded old-school measurements, with 454g being a big one here too, though less for butter and more for meats. We also occasionally have, say, milk sold in 2.27 litres, i.e. 4 pints, amongst other examples.

Jon

🤦‍♂️

Corey Gross

I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but the math seems off on the sifted vs dip-and-sweep bit. 130/4=32.5, so 160g would be a difference of 30/130, or ~23%. But also, if an ounce is ~28.35g, then 130g is ~4.59oz and 160g is ~5.64oz.

Bryan R Chitwood

I couldn't agree more--and if I see one more "youtube chef" use liquid measuring cups to measure dry ingredients, I'm going to scream.

Carolyn Blakeney

I am in the U.S. and it is hundreds of years past the time we should have ditched the King's measurements and upgraded to metric. I love using scales and actually treat it as a mindfulness exercise to measure out as accurately as possible.

Carolyn Blakeney

The King Arthur Baking website has a chart comparing volumetric to mass measurements of common baking ingredients. Since these guys have been at it so long, I use that as my starting reference when a site does not include mass measures.

Carolyn Blakeney

The King Arthur Baking website has a chart comparing volumetric to mass measurements of common baking ingredients.

Derekl1963

I bet we have the same old OXO scale... We've had ours about a decade too. We weigh our guinea pigs in grams too, because it's a finer scale than ounces. "Why use metric units? What’s wrong with my good ol’ freedom units?" Minor quibble here... While volumetric measurements (cups/tsp/tbsp) can't be used in baker's percentages, weight measurements (ozs) can.

SilkiePJ

I bought the Escali Primo Digital Food Scale on Brian Lagerstrom's recommendation and love it.

Penny Bees

I stopped avoiding baking after I started using a scale and recipes written with weights of ingredients. I’d love it if recipes for baking would also provide temperatures to check for doneness instead of the “skewer with a few crumbs” method. This can be wildly inaccurate, in my experience.

Miri

But does it merit a T-shirt (like triangles)? Seriously, although fluent in "Imperial" measurement all of my recipes are metric. My first go through someone else's unconverted recipe includes a pencil and a scale. What lobby is responsible for keeping non-metric folk in the dark ages?

D W

Excellent explanation of Baker's %. I would love to see a post on how to convert any bread using Baker's % when using Zadane or Tangzhong Roux methods.

John

First and always, thank you. As a radio host (KAOS-fm in Olympia), a good conversational style makes me happy. And- you're actually funny when you're being funny - trust me, many aren't. That said, "quidditch" levels of silly?? I'll see your quidditch and raise you a "Fizzbin" ... Fizzbin rules make the Monty Python "buying a mattress" sketch look lucid. (yes, I'm old.) ever grateful for your presence, John Ford

Merna Brown

I use the Unni scale as it has two platforms; one for small grams and one for the heavier weights. It was less money at the time than the OXO. One thing that surprises me though is how different sites convert a cup of flour in different grams. I just shrug and use what they say. I get wildly different measurements without using weights. Also I’ve noticed there is a difference depending on how old my flour is and the weather. I usually buy 10km of flour, twice a year so there is a change.

Glen

Yeah, I feel ya. I think recipe sites use these arbitrary doneness indicators because most home kitchens either don't have or don't believe they need instant read thermometers and scales. More and more people are picking up scales and thermometers, but it'll take time before we see widespread adoption in blogs.