Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Downloads

Content

OA1295 - Today on Rapid Response Friday: your questions about the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, actual justice for the Tate brothers, Trump’s mystery meat, and the Fifth Circuit’s extremely normal holding that there is no cognizable Constitutional right to clean water and/or honest government.

Finally, today’s footnote recognizes the 60th anniversary of the original Star Trek series with a five-minute mission to boldly go where no podcast has gone before: the strange new world of a poorly-drafted clause in creator Gene Roddenberry’s divorce settlement which was more trouble than a cargo hold full of Tribbles.

“Further Ensuring Affordable Beef For the American Consumer,” The White House (8/26/26)

“Why Did Trump Order Up 660 Million Pounds of Mystery Meat?”, Ercic Schlosser , The New York Times  (9/7/26)

Sterling et al v. City of Jackson, No. 24-60370 (5th Cir., 9/4/2026)

Roddenberry v Roddenberry, 44 Cal. App. 4th 634 (1996) 

Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

Files

Comments

My house is a mess but I read a lot of books

I once worked in the periodicals section of Oxford Uni libraries, and I discovered that there is a trade publication for everything, from Potato Markets Weekly to Containerisation International. There was a meat one as well, I just don't remember the title.

General Contact Unit Problem Child

I know you were joking about it, but could it actually matter in anyway legally that they were just totally getting the details TNG and DS9 wrong in the ruling?

General Contact Unit Problem Child

Also I assume that court ruling has to be from like 1993 or early 94 if it’s making reference to DS9 and TNG but not voyager?

Matt Cameron

This was harmless error given the (I think correct) finding that the analysis should have been on what "Star Trek" would have meant to the parties in 1969 rather than whether '90s Trek was a "continuation" of TOS. But still funny!

Matt Cameron

The appellate decision was from '96 but the trial proceedings were held much earlier. The court would have just called it "Star Trek 4" despite the total lack of whales

Peter Baird

I don't suppose I need to point out Lean Beef Trimmings is a terrific band name.