Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Downloads

Content

Liz and Andrew evaluate the Trump indictment and answer listener questions as well as a Just Security article critiquing their position.

The Patreon bonus contains a deep dive into an Andrew Weissman statement on MSNBC on lesser-included offenses.

This is a paid post on Patreon.

NotesINDICTMENThttps://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

STATEMENT OF FACTShttps://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-SOF.pdf

NY Crim Proc. § 30.10 (Statute of Limitations)https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/criminal-procedure-law/cpl-sect-30-10.html

NY Crim Law § 175.05https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/penal-law/pen-sect-175-05.htmlNY Crim Law § 175.10https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/penal-law/pen-sect-175-10.html

People v. Hankinhttps://casetext.com/case/people-v-hankin

People v. Saporitahttps://casetext.com/case/people-v-saporita-stevenson

Just Security articlehttps://www.justsecurity.org/85831/the-broad-scope-of-intent-to-defraud-in-the-new-york-crime-of-falsifying-business-records/

Files

Comments

Papa Fishy 🐟

When it comes to tolling the limitations can't you just say Trump was president, we could not indict so it was paused.

Jack Russell Weinstein

That was going to be my point as well. If the claim is that "you can't sure the President of the United States," then isn't Bragg able to claim equitable tolling until noon, Jan 20, 2021?