OA759: The "Socks" Case - Don't Take Legal Advice From Judicial Watch! (feat. Kel McClanahan) (Patreon)

Republicans are saying that the "Clinton sock drawer case" - Judicial Watch v. NARA - means that Trump didn't violate the Espionage Act and can just declare anything he wants to be a "personal" record.

That's nonsense, of course.

This is an unpaid post on Patreon.

NotesJudicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration, 845 F.Supp.2d 288 (D.D.C.2012)https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15818036517066124081

Donate to National Security Counselors!https://donate.democracyengine.com/NationalSecurityCounselors/contributeOR

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=QQY2ZQMWC6PX6