Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Downloads

Content

Liz and Andrew take a deep look at the U.S. v. Trump docket and explain how some minor-seeming procedural filings may tell us more than you'd think about how Donald Trump intends to mount a defense for crimes that he's definitely guilty of. You won't want to miss this one!

This is an unpaid post on Patreon.

NotesTrump dockethttps://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490071/united-states-v-trump/

Trump opp Motion for Continuancehttps://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.66.0.pdfTrump Speedy Trial Act reporthttps://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.72.0.pdfDOJ Denney case filehttps://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/denney-lucas

United States v. Hatfield, 466 F. App’x 775, 777 (11th Cir. 2012)https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23870839-us-v-hatfield

In re Grand Jury Investigation (Mueller Challenge)https://casetext.com/case/in-re-investigation-5442

Files

Comments

C’mon

Yet again analysis not heard anywhere,,, awesome