Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

As we wrap up part 2 of the 1990 IT miniseries, we have to ask ourselves... which version is better? Certainly the effects are improved in Andy Muschietti's take, but is that it? And even though they're better, the effects in the 1990 version feel more charming and somehow scarier. You'll have to watch along with me & Kevin and then let us know!

Also I visited a cool Universal Studios exhibit in Philly, check it out in the video above!

IT (1990): Part 2Commentary TrackWatch Us Watch

Wangers Karaoke 2026 - LIVE in LA on Sunday, June 28thTickets are only $10, and they'll be going up to $15 soon so jump on em now!!!

Get official PMI shirts, hoodies, beanies, etc on shop.prettymuch.it! Free shipping on orders over $100 (US only).

The following tracks are currently available for Free Members to download:Invincible S4E1The Boys S5E1Spacehunter: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone

ALL TRACKSBrowse the full list of every single commentary track we've ever released on prettymuch.it!

📍 Philadelphia, PA

Files

5/11/26

Comments

Lucas David

Yes. It is only worth watching or reading for the clown. Bill Skarsgard's pennywise is not scary to anyone past the age of 12 years old. Tim Curry's pennywise has stood the test of time because he's actually genuinely creepy. Like remove the makeup and you just have a creepy man. With the makeup he becomes terrifying.

DavidTorto

Got low expectations for the 2nd half of this as i thought the first half was pretty boring and Tim Curry's pennywise ain't scary at all i just see him as a regular clown

DUG

Yes it is. Better as in more enjoyable, I'm having more fun with the 1990 series than the 2017 reboot