Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

WHAT'S IT ABOUT? 

A young Viking bucks tradition and defies his father by refusing to become a dragon-killer, befriending and flying one instead.

IS IT ANY GOOD?

Universtal and Dreamworks largely avoid the pitfalls of Disney's live action remakes here. How? By hiring the same writer-director (Dean DeBlois) and the same composer (John Powell) of the animated trilogy and then getting the hell out of their way.

Make no mistake, this is a movie that only exists by corporate mandate because the suits wanted to make money. But they were smart enough to approach DeBlois, who only agreed to sign after he was granted full creative control. The bean-counters wisely stayed out of the kitchen and let the man cook.

This film's greatest strength is what seemed, in the trailers, to be its greatest weakness: there's almost nothing new or different here. I griped about it for months leading to the film's release. You can't improve on perfection, so why try?

The movie is not, as some feared, a shot-for-shot remake. The camera is put in a lot of different places and does plenty of things it doesn't do in the animated version. But the film is, very nearly, a word-for-word remake, something that made me roll my eyes for the first 10-15 minutes until I realized something...

I was having a great time.

See, that first animated film has an immaculate screenplay. DeBlois knows this and barely changes a thing here, which is a major reason the film works. It adds scenes and lines of dialogue, but it doesn't take any away (that I could tell). It's the same reason you can change the cast of a Broadway show and if the script is good, it'll still work. A powerful story is a powerful story. 

If you've ever seen a beloved play more than once, you know what I'm talking about. Various performers will deliver lines differently and find new perspectives on their characters, tweaks in the orchestrations and staging may reveal new shades to the tone, but if it's done well, it's still going to inspire you, thrill you, make you laugh, and make you cry.

This analogy is the key to having a blast with this new movie. For example (stay with me on this), LES MISERABLES is my favorite musical. It's based on a fantastic book. Both the lyrics and the music of the play are sublime, almost regardless of who is performing them.

In my opinion, the original Broadway cast from 1987 delivers it best, but I've still gone to see "Les Mis" in many cities. If it's done well then I don't find myself missing my favorite version but rather enjoying the version in front of me.

Similarly, the biggest compliment I can give this new HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON is that I almost never found myself wishing I were watching the animated one instead, even though that one IS better. This is a four-star remake of a five-star classic.

The loss of a star comes from how the new cast, with one exception, doesn't nail the comedic delivery as well as the previous one did. 

Mason Thomas as Hiccup is on-par with Jay Baruchel dramatically; his connection with Toothless is beautiful, his heartache and loneliness are equally palpable. He's just not as funny given the same jokes. 

Ditto the quintet of dragon-fighting teenagers who, to be fair, are all good but operating at about 70% of the charm of their animated counterparts. 

Nico Parker as Astrid suffers the most. She's very convincing in the emotional moments, but falls a bit flat compared to America Ferrera for the character's fiery intensity and blistering wit. This is odd, because Parker delivered these traits very well as Pedro Pascall's ill-fated daughter in the memorable pilot episode of THE LAST OF US. 

Thank heavens, then, for the inspired casting of Nick Frost (HOT FUZZ), who is quite funny as Gobber. He's true to the nature and personality of the character but wisely makes it his own instead of impersonating Craig Ferguson. He has delightful chemistry with every cast member, bringing out the best in anyone he shares the screen with.

Equally inspired was bringing back Gerard Butler as Stoic. I've long thought that Stoic was Butler's best role, and he proves it once again here. I don't know that I've ever seen such a perfect translation of an animated character to live action. 

Butler's not phoning it in: he clearly loves this character and looks happy to be back. Instead of changing things up from the animated version, he reliably just brings the goods. He knows exactly what he's doing, the same way Topol defined the character of Tevye in both the stage and screen versions of FIDDLER ON THE ROOF. Hey, if it ain't broke...

This HTTYD remake is on-par with the animated version emotionally, delivering the pathos and character drama with great skill and sincerity. The scenes that made you cry in the original will still make you cry here. 

The one area that it may actually improve upon the original is in its sense of danger. While the dragons and some of the environments here are still CGI, their style is less cartoony overall in order to match the live-action human actors. This change, as well as the staging of the action, make the flying, dragon-taming, and combat scenes even more thrilling.

Speaking of animation style, Toothless here feels like the same character and is a 90% style-match, though he's slightly less playful/silly and more animal-like here. It's a good tweak given the tone of this version.

Visually, the film is gorgeously-shot and lit. The production design, sets, and wardrobe spare no expense. The sound design is rich and robust. This was a fantastic IMAX experience for me.

Composer John Powell finds that sweet spot of honoring his iconic scores for this series while switching things up and keeping it fresh. His score here is a bit like seeing your favorite band play live (assuming your favorite band is GREAT live): the melody is close enough to the studio version that you're still humming along, but they're going to try some new orchestrations, use the instruments differently, throw in some new lyrics, and show off a bit. In other words, this is another John Powell HTTYD score you're going to want to buy.

All told, does this film need to exist? It doesn't, not when the original is practically perfect. But I'm not mad about it. I even look forward to seeing it again. Why should you go see this when you've technically got a better version at home? The same reason we go see our favorite plays over and over: we love the stories and new productions help us to enjoy them in a new light. 

For the studio, this is a blatant cash-grab. But for the creators this is a labor of love and, if you're like me, you'll feel that love again too. No one is more surprised about it than I am. 

WHY IS IT RATED PG?

Plenty of dragon-and-fire related peril, though we don't see any on-screen deaths or gore. Very mild language and innuendo. This is made to be family-friendly. 

HOW CAN IT HELP?

Hiccup's story is potent and healing for those who feel like they don't fit in. Stoic and the villagers don't value Hiccup at first; he believes that he's deficient, but it's their narrow views that are actually the issue. He's strong, smart, and brave in ways they've not considered, and his compassion makes him great. 

Similarly, you may be surrounded by people who don't value what you bring to the table, but that's because of their limitations and biases, not due to a lack of worth on your part. Be you, do your thing, give love, and you'll either change hearts, find your people, or both.

Are you hyped for the new film? Why or why not? If you've seen it, what did you think?

Files

Comments

Jae Lynn

Beautifully said. Fully agree!

Aeras

I will be very, VERY interested to see Dreamworks first live action remake. For one reason in particular: it's founder SPECIFICALLY created Dreamworks animation in SPITE of Disney. Disney fired him roughly in the middle of the making of A Goofy Movie after an argument. Then he went on to make Dreamworks animation studio and constantly gave Disney a run for their money. Dreamworks LIVES for showing up Disney. That's why I've neen incredibly interested to see what they'd do with this live action remake; to see what they'd do to show up Disney. I can't wait to see it.

genovianprince

I almost cried at work reading this review over, because I've been hoping so hard that the movie would be great. I didn't want my all-time favorite movie to have a stain on its reputation. I was already going to go see it in theaters this Sunday with my family, but hearing firsthand that it's pretty damn good has me even more excited than I already was. Thanks for the review, Jono! I can't wait to go see it C:

Ann Brookens

Well, I'm hyped NOW...! Thanks for this review; otherwise I'm not sure I would have bothered. I haven't seen the last I-don't-know-how-many Disney remakes because...why??? No reason to go since I have no children clamoring to see them.

Brenden Krogh

I love the original HTTYD and I'm happy to hear the new one is good! I literally watched the movie version of Les Miserables last night with my friend who had never seen it before! As a classically trained singer, I used to criticize the movie version of Les Mis, but last night I was thinking more about the story and what these characters were teaching me and I cried my eyes out! It's my favorite musical too! Can you guys do a psychology of hero for Jean Valjean?

Sophia Betakyah

Thank you for taking the time to write this review! I wasn't sure if I'd bother going to see it because I'm so tired of watching all of Disney's crappy remakes (and I've only actually seen a few,) so it's good to know that this is worth my time.

Kate Jung

I’ve seen it and like you’ve mentioned I felt that some of the performances were lackluster, by which I mean they’ve lost some of the charm of the animated version. However, I wasn’t expecting the same level of charm given that this is live action so all in all it was enjoyable. The movie was a 1:1 copy which is playing it very safe but I would’ve been disappointed if they took it and went in a completely different direction to an already perfect movie so I wasn’t mad about it. I did feel that Astrid’s character felt like the weakest performance considering that her presence felt very small compared to her animated counterpart. Toothless is equally as cute and lovable as the orginal. The BY FAR the standout of this film was Gerard Butler and his STELLAR performance. Also the popcorn bucket of Toothless is so cute >.<

Bäckis

i havent and will not watch the remake on the principles that these movies should not exist and have no right or resson to and i wont support the practice of remaking animated classics into live action. Even when its a good remake or movie its still a bad practice as its a disrepect towords animation as a medium in my opinion

Leach Sewallur

Thank you for writing such an in-depth critique. This is just want I wanted to read to know whether I should see it. Thanks!

MrWishart

Glad you enjoyed it

Ian K

I felt a physically repulsion to the announcement teaser. The original's probably in my top 10 all time favorites, and I was so upset this existed. Now, I keep seeing reviews like this that got past their disgust with its existence to just plain enjoy the movie, so I'm feeling more torn. I'm carrying both the same repulsion I started with, AND a slowly growing desire to actually enjoy it all over again. What a weird mix.

SilverWolf

On principle I don't really want to see the movie, as another commentor said, it feels like an knock on the medium of animation 'needing' a live action version, but I'm glad it was decent and that they got the OG director back!

MsHalcyon

I typically fall in the camp of "these live-action remakes everyone is doing are low-quality money grabs that don't stand up to the originals," but I was hopeful with this film. I saw it last night with a friend who loves the original very much and was fully hyped for the remake, and I have to say that it lived up to her expectations and exceeded mine! I would also gladly see it again. I appreciated the greater sense of danger, and while yes, it wasn't quite as funny as the original, I don't think it actually suffered all that much as a result. Jono is right on all counts, but I would give it 4.5 out of 5 against the perfect 5 of the original.

Samantha Mansell

would love to see a psychology of a hero video on jean valjean from les mis!!!!

Ron Hopping

I still rather see a parody of a cash grab live action remake of shrek. Giving it the full blown awful Disney remake treatment would only fuel it's fire.

Taejas Kudva

Thank you for that Le Mis analogy, because it might be saving my sanity tomorrow. I have not seen a live action remake since Mulan lured me back in and broke my heart after swearing off them due to Beauty and the Beast. We're seeing HTTYD tomorrow because it's my daughter's choice for her birthday party, and I was prepared to just be sad, but this review really helped me frame this in another way.

Allison Hall

This was such a wonderful recap of your thoughts and opinions and I loved every second of reading it. I was going back and forth on whether or not to watch this movie, and with your thoughtful review, I think I'm going to give it an honest go. Thank you so much for sharing!!

Reem

What a thoughtful and constructive review! I agree with you that the movie probably didn’t need to be made and the original animated movie is great, but I am looking forward to watching the live action version.

The Dark Lord Mia Belle

Thanks for this I helps that someone as critical as you gave a good review to what I thought was gonna a be a crash and burn it makes me wanna give it a chance

Draktheon

I went to see this movie on opening night here (two days ago). I spent so much of it with tears in my eyes, I'm surprised I was able to notice the only two things that actually annoyed/upset me. The tears were a good thing. I'm otherkin, specifically a golden, western dragon, and seeing the CGI dragons so well created on the screen...it made me feel like I wasn't alone, like somewhere in the world, we dragons aren't just myth, they looked and acted so real and felt more real than the humans on the screen. I still adore the original animation, I love it more than the live action, but this movie did something wonderful and didn't compromise the original or do any injustice. My only gripe is cosmetic - I didn't like that Astrid wasn't blonde and that the twins weren't as identical as male/female twins can be. During the first movie, the twins appearance isn't really important, it comes up more in the show, so its still far from a deal breaker and the movie was still beautiful and brilliant

LG Alfonso

I was very reluctant to see the movie, to the point where I got annoyed with my mom when she said she wanted to see it. But this review put things into perspective for me, and made me consider what live action remakes could be if they were good, actually. Plus, I would like an excuse to see the flying scenes in theaters again—not to mention Gerard Butler in a role he’s happy with. I’ve shared this review with my mom, and we’re planning to see it together when she’s back in town.

NH

Yeah I can't listen to live recordings of songs I love because they are different - sometimes even subtly so! This is also the reason I don't like live plays or going to see musicals in person even if I adore them. I'm way too autistic for that - I notice all the differences and get caught up with them. So I recognise that this film was not made for me, but I'm glad it's not the trainwreck people feared it could be.

Allegra Fortin

I’ve always thought the Test Drive scene is one of the best in the trilogy, and certainly one of the most important. When I heard they were making a live action version, I said to myself “if they can nail the Test Drive scene, then they’ll have done the majority of the dramatic work to be an effective movie”. Did they nail it, in your opinion?

tres 🫶🏻

Thank you for the inspiration to give this remake a shot! After the Lion King remake, I stopped going to see all live action adaptations in theaters, saving my money to support original ideas (and cinema therapy studios!). However, I was pleasantly surprised by how well DreamWorks did at their first adaptation and, I have to point out, their first ever live action film period!! While I am begging DreamWorks doesn't continue a live action remake streak, I would love to see live action work from their studio in the future! I thought HTTYD was very well done and very much a love letter to the fans. It reminds me of the Wicked movie, strangely enough; it's long, it's not quite as good as its source material, yet I had a great time!

Kate Ackerley

Jono, after reading your review I decided to give it a chance and I even think I loved it more than you!! Thank you! You are 100% on point except that I did like Astrid, she felt a bit of a different character more like 2nd and 3rd movie Astrid but still I liked her. I felt like watching a play with two different actors giving their slightly bit different versions of the same character. Gerard Butler was top notch. Best Gerard Butler character of all time. That guy was born to be a viking. I kind of pictured the kids to be a bit younger in the animated one but it works. The jokes don't land as well because the humor is old LOL but it still works. It doesn’t try to be better than the animated, it tries to be more real and I like that because it feels it knows what it is.