Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Thumbnail work in Progress :)

Files

Previews only

US Forces 1945: Why not Berlin?

Why didn’t the United States Army and/or the British Army invade Berlin in 1945? To understand why the Western Allies did not go for Berlin, it important to understand a) the positioning of the various armies and their ongoing operations b) the manpower situation in general, c) the specific manpower situation due to the ongoing war in the Pacific, d) that although the German Forces were mostly beaten, they still could inflict some damage, e) that in some areas public order had to be restored and f) that the Soviets were not limited to Berlin neither. Jesse's Twitter: https://twitter.com/jesse_history Cover design by vonKickass. »» SUPPORT MHV «« » patreon, see videos early (adfree) - https://www.patreon.com/join/mhv » subscribe star - https://www.subscribestar.com/mhv » paypal donation - https://paypal.me/mhvis »» MERCHANDISE «« » teespring - https://teespring.com/stores/military-history-visualized » SOURCES « Giangreco, D. M.: Hell to Pay: Operation Downfall and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947. US Naval Institute Press: United States, 2017. MacDonald, Charles B.: The Last Offensive. United States Army in World War II. The European Theater of Operations. CMH Pub 7-9-1 Center of Military History – United States Army: Washington, D.C., 1993 (1973). Ball, Simon: The Mediterranean and North Africa, 1940-1944, in: Cambridge History of the Second World War – Volume I, p. 358-388. Barbier, Mary Kathryn: The war in the West, 1943-1945. in: Cambridge History of the Second World War – Volume I, p. 389-419. Biddle, Tami Davis: On the Crest of Fear: V-Weapons, the Battle of the Bulge, and the Last Stages of World War II in Europe. In: The Journal of Military History. Vol. 83, No. 1, January 2019. Mawdsley, Evan: Thunder in the East. The Nazi-Soviet War 1941-1945. Second Edition. Bloomsbury: London, 2016. Citino, Robert M.: The Wehrmacht’s Last Stand. The German Campaigns of 1944-1945. University Press of Kansas: USA, 2017. Overmans, Rüdiger: Deutsche militärische Verluste im Zweiten Weltkrieg. R. Oldenbourg Verlag: München, Germany, 2004. Yelton, David K.: Hitler’s Volkssturm. The Nazi Militia and the Fall of Germany 1944-1945. Kansas University Press: Kansas, US, 2002. Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg – Band 9 / 1 – Deutsche Kriegsgesellschaft 1939 bis 1945. Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg – Band 10/1: Der Zusammenbruch des Deutschen Reiches 1945 und die Folgen des Zweiten Weltkrieges. Teilband 1: Die militärische Niederwerfung der Wehrmacht. Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, Stuttgart 2008. Fennell, Jonathan: Fighting the People’s War. The British and Commonwealth Armies and the Second World War. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019. Department of History at the United States Military Academy: Reduction Of Ruhr Pocket And Advance To the Elbe And Middle Rivers, 5-18 April 1945 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Allied_invasion_of_Germany#/media/File:Advance_through_Germany_-_5-18_April_1945.jpg Why didn’t the Nazis let the Allies take Berlin? https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/i4povh/why_didnt_the_nazis_let_the_allies_take_berlin/ #WhyNotBerlin #BattleOfBerlin #AttackingBerlin

Comments

Kevin Dragos

That Churchill quote has always confused me. How could the British be "completely at the end of manpower resources"? Britain suffered higher losses during World War I than World War II, and that was when they had a lower population, yet they didn't seem to let up on fighting then. How could their manpower situation have been that bad, especially as soon as late 1943? Did he just not want Britain to take losses like that again or did they physically not have enough people?

Eric Stuyvesant

@1:14: "contractionary" in the Citino quote should probably be "contradictory"... Not a criticism.

Military History Visualized

I am not completely aware on the manpower distributions of the British Empire / UK in WW1 and WW2. I know that in WW1 they called back miners if I remember correctly from the front lines. Then about fighting, well in WW1 you clearly had more infantry, but in WW2 there were very likely far more men in the RAF. Which is another point, more ships, tanks and aircraft for that you need more resources (mines, shipping, etc.) and also more factories. Another point is of course, you never have enough, yet one makes ways to get more people, but if I remember correctly several divisions were disbanded as well.