Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Poll

MonkeyDM's Poll: Should I include the adventures in the Dragon's Hoard ?

  • Yes 63
  • No 5
  • 2020-11-24
  • 68 votes
{'title': "MonkeyDM's Poll: Should I include the adventures in the Dragon's Hoard ?", 'choices': [{'text': 'Yes', 'votes': 63}, {'text': 'No', 'votes': 5}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2020, 11, 24, 9, 53, 19, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 68}

Content

I'm currently compiling the next dragon's hoard which is coming out later this week.

So far dragon's hoard have not included adventures, because when I first started I was mostly focusing on player options, but now I do both, so should I include adventures going forward ?

Comments

Nanocactus

Personally, I think there is value in having adventures, rulesets and player options separated, but with references to one another if needed. For example if an adventure works with certain subclasses or optional rules, then a note would be added in the introduction to point to the related documents; or if the adventure introduces a subclass or a rule, then it can be an addendum. It would facilitates finding information: all the rules organised in a set of documents, all the subclasses grouped together, and adventures separate from the rest.