Home
Creators
Search Recent Missing Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Patreon Exclusive Video: Human Slop (Patreon)

Published:
2025-05-22 13:31:55
Imported:
2026-06
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

We all know about AI slop, but what about "human slop"? Is it a thing? I've eaten at Taco Bell before, so I can definitively say Yes. What differentiates "human slop" from "AI slop"? What makes something "sloppy" in the first place? In this Patreon exclusive, I go over some of these questions and explore different types of "human slop."

These are some thoughts I had while writing part 1 of the AI video, but didn't put in because I didn't want to over-inflate the art section of that video. But I wanted to share with you all... let me know if you enjoy this type of content and I can share some more thoughts!

Part 2 of the AI video is still in the oven, set to premiere June 1st or 2nd.

Files

Previews only

human slop

"to slop is human"....errrrrr

Comments

millimeter cohen

So for Art, the audience has to in some way submit to the subjectivity of the work to engage with it (create a "human connection"). But submission carries risk, what if you don't like the Art's subjectivity? What if the Art doesn't like you? Slop doesn't have a subjectivity (or its subjectivity is determined solely by the invisible hand of the market/algorithm) and so it doesn't pose that risk. AI hasn't democratized Art, but it HAS democratized Slop. In the absence of a subjectivity or the desire for one, choosing the object is creative control

Leaf
>>174956628

"AI hasn't democratized Art, but it HAS democratized Slop." Oh no this is 100% true and I hate it. 😆

Just Like a Metaphor

I dislike this fiction that AI art isn't made by humans. Sure, it's a highly automated process where you don't need to draw a line, granted. But by that logic, we don't make photos or movies or animation or video games either, and who would say there is no art in those mediums? No subjectivity? No 'soul'? We have tons of art whose creation would be impossible without automation, and we have tons of proof of how this really doesn't matter with how 'artistic' or 'human' a work is (or isn't). Humanity has broadly accepted that human direction of a machine can be artistic for longer than I've been alive. Artificial means human-created, paper and pencils and paint aren't natural. All art is artificial, and everything artificial is completely, indelibly human. The criticism of training data harvesting is a new problem we have to figure out, but it's one of capitalism. It doesn't really hold water as critique of the art made with AI, it isn't like digital artists stop making art because of the exploitive creation of their Wacom tablets and PC parts. Most people don't like that exploitation and try to spend toward the least of it, but it doesn't mean the art created with it is bad, and the alternative is not making art because every medium has its exploitations. Even paint used to be horrifically toxic. So in the end, slop is just a pejorative. It means you don't like the thing, and the quality that makes it slop can be whatever you rationalize. It's language of prejudice against the outside medium, it's respectability politics, the posturing of aesthetic supremacy.