Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Looked like A was a clear stand out! I think it was all of the penises... So here's a WIP. The angle has been lowered a little to make the composition a little more dynamic. I'll be sure to have some alts for this one, and it should be done fairly quickly. Thanks everyone for voting!

Files

Comments

Shawn K. Younkin

Taffy is going to have a good time! This looks soooo good already!

Fro Title

I really want to know the backstory of this one. What is she up to that got her into this situation?

Spaceman

To be fair, I think your sketch was actually more dynamic because her legs were angled, creating more of a v-shape (kinda like perspective lines) which always makes an image look more dynamic. This one has a flat, horizontal composition, which is literally the opposite of dynamic, lol. Not complaining, just saying that you didn’t need to second-guess your original idea. Believe in yourself! :)

John

lolol "I think it was all of the penises..." got me.

John

Looks amazing!!

Jen

This is gonna be good

Squeezable

Thanks! There's a bit more to it than that. I felt the thumbnail had a very sort of isometric look to it. I lowered the viewing angle to introduce a bit of foreshortening on the limbs and torso. Also it allows me to use the trainees on either side to help frame the focal point, (hopefully) creating a greater sense of overall depth to the scene.

Spaceman

You're definitely correct that this version is more dynamic in terms of incorporating more focal effects (like the foreshortening of her one leg), but from a compositional standpoint I feel like the other one was more dynamic. In this version, for instance, her legs literally create a flat, horizontal line that bisects the middle of the frame, whereas before they were angled into a dynamic V shape. I do want to be clear that I am NOT shitting on either pic!!!! You're my favorite artist and I love your work... I just wanted to give my two cents. I sincerely hope I didn't hurt your feelings!

Squeezable

Not at all. Your points are totally valid, and I actually really appreciate your feedback. Just wanted to elaborate a bit on my rationale for the changes.