Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Videos

  • 530034125.mp4

Downloads

Content

Adolescence is a Netflix series that has taken the UK by storm. It's been hailed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has made the "groundbreaking series" available for students across the country because of the light it shines on internet misogyny.

But Adolescence and the discourse around it has a lot in common with moral panics of the past, amping up fear, proposing increased police funding as a solution, and promoting a national policy of digital abstinence that doesn't actually help young boys or girls.

Let's look at what Adolescence has to say about misogyny and the internet, and how they mirror earlier moral panics about knives and about mugging.

This video is currently only available here (and on Nebula shortly) so please let me know what you think, what you feel, and if there are any egregious mistakes. I know some of the camera footage is a little out of focus, my camera had a hard time auto-focusing with my new glasses, but I couldn't reshoot the whole thing. 🫣

Files

Comments

J. Smith

This was really solid, I learned so much.

Bruna

I haven't finished the video yet (20 minutes in), but I just think it's kinda crazy you posted this as i was relistening to the Of Boys and Men episode of IBCK

Caylin Lee

I really enjoyed this video. I have a lot of concerns about boys being exposed to manosphere-adjacent content online and this gave me a lot to think about.

David Stosser

Is there a common pattern between crime of whatever type being at a local low ebb, therefore media hypes up what's left?

Skye Keating

This might be somewhat scattered, but I'm hoping I get my point across. All the anti-misogyny stuff sounds great. Then the solution gets tied to the police and criminality. That will never solve the problem. Police, even the women, are cogs in an inherently misogynistic machine. Shit like "Adolescence" portrays police as the answer, or at the very least, as highly tangential to the answer. They should not even be part of the conversation. Police can't help with misogyny any more than they can help with racism. The call is coming from inside the house. The vast majority of teens who fall down the online misogynist rabbit hole will never commit a murder; they'll just be awful to women for their entire lives. I personally don't think we should criminalize being a piece of shit, so the cops aren't really an aspect at all in 99% of cases. This is a societal problem. A lot of really awful and influential people want everyone to believe it is a crime problem or it's a mental health problem. Telling towns, "have more cops," and telling parents, "watch your kids better," is a lot easier than saying "we need to dismantle society so we can rebuild it more equitably." Sadly for everyone, the latter, and much more difficult solution, is the only real solution. Even if we only call it a mental health problem, it is a, no pun intended, cop-out. It's like if someone with a hole in their car's gas tank called it a "fuel problem." Yes, technically that is correct, but putting gas in the car without first fixing the hole will not make the car work.

Skip Intro

i do as well! i just don't think that digital abstinence is the path forward

Skip Intro

I think you bring up a great point about most who fall down the misogynist rabbit hole not being criminals, just being awful to women for their lives. That is a real problem! I just don't think digital abstinence or policing are the ways forward because they're ineffective and have massive collateral damage. But, I do think it likely requires some kind of state response to address. I thought Kate's arguments in our interview about which regulations and steps we could take to protect children from online harms were very insightful and I do think that education — like real, comprehensive education about sex, gender, boundaries — is still the best bang for our buck in limiting harm to children, whether it be from abuse or from exploitative algorithms that peddle misogyny to everyone.

David Stosser

Sure, but I'm wondering if lowering crime rates is a predictor, by say a year or two, of the next media storm on the topic.

JW

Thank you for the upload and analysis. Will be good to watch your interviews with the expert guests later.

Aidan O

Yesss, another civil war hater. Sorry if you’ve posted somewhere but would super love to hear your thoughts. Also absolutely jarring to randomly see Charlie Kirk, considering…..

Skye Keating

I agree, digital abstinence and policing definitely aren't going to make people less awful to women, like I said, with policing, the call is coming from inside the house. Cops love misogyny. Digital abstinence won't work for the same reason. Cops love it because society is in love with misogyny. Even without a phone, it will still be pushed on anyone who engages with society. I think comprehensive education is the best idea. Everyone should be taught about sex, gender, consent, etc., in an age-appropriate manner, starting when they enter school and continuing until they exit school. One of the things I think is essential to teach, but rarely is, is that sometimes things are fiction, even if they don't immediately look that way. Everyone knows that a Marvel movie is fiction, but many people don't realize that when they load up "The Hub," they are also viewing a fictionalized version of what sex actually is. Education is the only way to change our society.

Sebastian Ochoa-Kaup

Watching this video today (9/21) with the public discussion about the Kirk shooting and political violence discourse so fresh in mind, this video is hitting in a way I didn't expect!!

Skip Intro

huge thanks to your awesome help with research!!!!!

Skip Intro

i swear i didn't know that was going to happen to kirk when i put him in