Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Female parts (Patreon)

Published:
2021-01-16 15:59:23
Edited:
2021-01-16 17:13:42
Imported:
2026-06

Poll

Female parts

  • 1. one stroke, less color or no color 8
  • 2. one color, fluffy shapes 43
  • 3. two colors, fluffy shapes 49
  • 2021-01-16
  • 100 votes
{'title': 'Female parts', 'choices': [{'text': '1. one stroke, less color or no color', 'votes': 8}, {'text': '2. one color, fluffy shapes', 'votes': 43}, {'text': '3. two colors, fluffy shapes', 'votes': 49}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2021, 1, 16, 15, 59, 23, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 100}

Content

Hello my dear patrons! I need to hear your opinions again! Because all my works i do for you.

When i draw the lion king characters (lion king style, cartoon style) what version/versions of female parts i should follow? Vote, please.

Files

Comments

Athari

I think it depends on the style and the intention. If the intention is to draw softcore nudity, the first option is the best as it's the "SFW-est". For the same reason, it doesn't work when the intention is porn. I personally prefer the second option as in my view it strikes the perfect balance between pretty and sexy. It's like the most common kind of furry porn with males — penises are usually not exact copies of animal penises, but rather something simplified for aesthetic purposes. If I understand correctly, the intention of the third option is to closely resemble animal vulvas. However, while I don't have an extensive collection of photos, the ones I have tend to not look like this. Some do, but usually there're less colors involved. If realism is your intention and you have photos to back up this style, then sure, go for it. I can certainly appreciate more realistic genitals, especially if the animal on the whole is drawn more realistically. So, while I prefer the second option (one color, fluffy), I think all three are fine. What I have problem with is when artists start inventing styles which aren't present in reality, like drawing thick black lines around vulvas.

Kilgore Trout (edited)

Comment edits

2026-09-05 20:00 Personally, I prefer a more realistic version (#3). I also really liked the way you've drawn female parts in your Nala and Sarafina & Sarabi pictures - I think that version of female parts was more realistic than versions 1, 2, and 3 and I wish that version was available.
2021-01-16 18:28 Personally, I prefer a more realistic version (#3). I also really liked the way you've drawn female parts in your Nala and Sarafina & Sarabi pictures - I think that version of female parts was more realistic than versions 1, 2, and 3 and I wish that version was available.

Personally, I prefer a more realistic version (#3). I also really liked the way you've drawn female parts in your Nala and Sarafina & Sarabi pictures - I think that version of female parts was more realistic than versions 1, 2, and 3 and I wish that version was available.

Magicat

I like the feral realism of #3 the best.

LionManatic

I really like the realism in the third one, but I can see the second option being used for virgin lionesses. Like Kiara going on her first hunt or Nala presenting to Simba for the first time or something like that

Redlinelies

Not a big fan of the third one, looks forced in the style used for TLK. 1 and 2 seems a bit more fair to me, although one might just be a little too simple in this case depending on who you ask. 3 just doesn't look like it belongs while the other two you see it as part of the image.

lynxgirl

thanks for your opinion! ^^