Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • CICO vs. Hormones_ History.pdf

Missing 1 full-res photo, 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

Hey everyone,

New video on Calories vs. Hormones. I know I've covered this kind of thing a couple times already, but I thought the historical perspective is really important. The timeline of calorimeter vs. radioimmunoassay was something I read about a long time ago but stuck with me for a while - by that time, I was already skeptical of tracking Calories and quite frankly was baffled why so many people are quick to defend it.
It made so much sense that if you give an idea a 100 year head start, it will strongly take root, even if it's not the most productive idea.

I realize calorie counting works for plenty of people, and it's not fair to say "Calories 100% don't matter at all."
But, it also causes a lot of confusion for many more people whilst hindering them from gaining a proper understanding of biology and what is important for health.  

If the question is "Is there something better than calories to track?" I'd say definitely.

Also I realize this video was a lot shorter than usual, I'm hoping to strike a balance with in depth vids and succinct ones with a clear point.

Looking forward to any questions/comments!

-Joseph

 

Files

Previews only

Why are we still Counting Calories? (History vs. Science)

Go to http://audible.com/whativelearned or text 'whativelearned' to 500-500 to get one free audiobook and a 30 day free trial of Audible ▲Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/WILearned ▲Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeverettlearned A quick look at why the ability to measure calories much earlier than we could measure hormones has affected weight loss approaches Featured Music: Broke for Free - 942 Miles For Business inquiries: joseph.everett.wil@gmail.com