Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Thank you to all of our Patrons for supporting us and reaching our $10,000 tier and special thanks to all those who submitted questions for our Q&A!

Files

Previews only

Q&A with Matt O'Dowd

Thank you to all of our Patrons for supporting us and special thanks to all who submitted questions to for our Q&A.

Comments

Dustin Edgeman

Space Time VR? Did I miss something awesome?

Anonymous

Hey where can i find those fany Wallpapers you get when subscribing ?

David M Shulski

I believe you said in an earlier episode that if an anti-matter black hole collided with a black hole, it would simply add the mass of the anti-matter black hole to itself. Yet Hawking radiation seems to base its theory on the idea that the anti-matter half of the virtual particle produced is the reason for its decay. The two theories don't seem to coincide. Additionally, shouldn't there be virtual particles created within the event horizon. If the gravitational pull is strong enough to create hawking radiation, shouldn't it also rip apart the virtual particles within the event horizon, pulling them in individually which would eventually increase the mass of the black hole?

David Moore

I find PBS Space Time series to be at just the right level for my understanding [or occasionally confusion]. Not too technical but well above Pop-Sci. It would be most helpful if Matt [or someone] could create a logical timeline of which order the episodes should be watched. Often the opening of an episode recommends which episode(s) might be helpful for better understanding of the current one.