Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Comment questions below!

Comments

Schlong Shucker

Dracula reveals in the flashback, that while he’s taken violent revenge against men in the past, he was often very discriminatory (in a good way), only punishing the 40 merchants who’d directly insulted him, not even their wives or children, compared to today where he’s killed hundreds of people who didn’t even know about his wife. Why do you think he didn’t bother being more specific with his punishment this time, even though the very woman who he’s fighting for preached that humans can be good?

Scrying_Sage

Throughout the episode, we’ve seen that both Dracula and Issac tend to downplay Hector, believing him to be incapable of betrayal (As Issac believes he’s a “simpler creature” who simply doesn’t like the squabbling of the war council). And yet, we see Hector beginning to side and scheme with Carmilla, who clearly has ulterior motives against Dracula. What do you think this implies about Hector’s character? Did Dracula and Issac misjudge him? Or does Carmilla’s manipulation only prove their beliefs?