Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • wlop 25 full.mp3

Missing 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

In this episode, the crew takes on a beloved figure of the academic ‘left’: Michel Foucault. The discussion gravitates around Foucault’s work in the early 1970’s on the ‘punitive society’, power as civil war, and popular rebellion. This post-‘68 period of his life and work is often seen as his most politically ‘radical’, both because of his activist involvement in the Prisons Information Group (GIP) and because he directly engages with Marxist discourse and thought. Nevertheless, the conversation quickly turns skeptical (to put it mildly). We question both the explanatory power and the political stakes of his historical studies: What is the principle of connection between the often remote historical discourses and events he examines and present conditions of life? What are the consequences of rejecting causal explanations of historical development? Above all, how salient and clarifying are his histories for emancipatory struggles in the present? We try to answer these questions, while poking a bit of fun at our Foucauldian friends and comrades. Oh and we talk about the CIA’s alleged awareness of the increasing hegemony of French theory in the academic left—apparently they loved that for us.

Follow us @leftofphil

References:

Michel Foucault, Penal Theories and Institutions: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1971-1972, ed. Bernard E. Harcourt et. al., trans. Graham Burchell (New York: Picador)

Michel Foucault, The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1972-1973, ed. Bernard E. Harcourt, trans. Graham Burchell (New York: Palgrave MacMillan)

Music: Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

Comments

Zoyd Noid

I think Foucault’s anti-programatism comes from a wider tendency of the rationalist wing of structuralism to argue that the order and connection of things is not intuitively graspable, that the real qua rational exists contra to phenomenological inquiry. so rather than being gestural or irrationalist (the genuine influence of heidegger nonwithstanding lol) foucault’s seemingly scattershot method might better adhere to what Althusser refers to the opaque method of “rationalist empiricism” which eradicates the reflexive subject from discourse. Problem is that this kind of asubjectivism is anathema to political praxis.

Richard

You really could have crapped some more on him.

Keanu Clark

Nixon with the Ecrit!!! 🤣🤣🤣