Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • wlop 47 cut.mp3

Missing 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

In today’s episode we talk about Guy Debord’s critique of life under modern capitalism by looking at his scathing and provocative The Society of the Spectacle. Is it true that all that was once lived is now mere representation? That the whole of society is mediated by an endless proliferation of passifying images? That the fullness of life has been replaced by its bloodless negation in survival? Because it sure feels like it! We discuss what exactly he means by spectacle, reflect on whether and how it’s possible to maintain his distinction between real needs and pseudo-needs, and consider what a politics without representation would, ahem, look like. And we talk some real trash on North American suburbia, whose surface-level image of homogeneous conflictless positivity is the true legitimation mechanism of capitalism here in the dying imperial core. It's a lot of fun, actually!

leftofphilosophy.com | @leftofphil

References:

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (New York: Zone Books, 1994).

Music: Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

Comments

GolfBaller

There's a Disneyland in Paris. Imagine going to France to go to Disneyland. 😅

Benjamin Waite

Great discussion. Along with their simplistic thoughts on USSR their desire for a particular sense of radical purity led them to be dismissive of many important political movements of the time. They were critical of Algerian independence movement, and quickly disillusioned with Cuban revolution etc... But for better (and worse) the members attempted to live this idea of a truly “lived life” and tried to get by without working, or even spending money. A lot of them sadly ended up committing suicide. I do think they had some powerful, if damning insight. I highly recommend Debord’s Comments on the Society of the Spectacle. Which is even less optimistic, but in many ways more prophetic of our current time.

Brandon Istenes

Debord mees Terrence McKenna: my parents said the time they took me & siblings to Disneyland they dropped acid and had a great time

ceifeiro

Lillian and Gil apply the term to clothes shopping, but "gilded survival" so perfectly captures what I think about car enthusiasts. Enthusiasts have to spend so much time working for, maintaining, and being inside of their cars that they convince themselves that they love them. Their life built around car dependence—a phenomenon itself built around a fantasy of endless and infinite economic growth—is re-spun as a joyous and free choice. I always ask myself if they really do love cars, or if the structure of their lives has foreclosed the possibility of finding any worthier love-object.

ceifeiro

Oh, and check out the YT channel Regular Car Reviews to see what I mean. The guy who tries to critique the cars' image as a way of critiquing gilded survival in general is still very much a gilded survivor, in that he implies that buying the "right" kind of car saves you from being another passive spectacle consumer.